Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology and Education Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Clinical Psychology, Student Research Committee, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Cognitive Sciences Studies, Tehran, Iran

5 Department of Psychology and Education Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

6 Department of Health Psychology, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad Universty, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of children’s
somatization inventory (CSI‑24) in a sample of Iranian school adolescents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, after translating and back‑translating CSI‑24,
comparisons were made with the original version. The study population consisted of 394 school
adolescents. Cronbach’s alpha method was used to examine the reliability of the scale. Furthermore,
the correlation of the scale with the Symptom Checklist‑90‑Revised was evaluated to determine its
criterion validity, using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
methods were applied for construct validity.
RESULTS: Investigation of the psychometric properties of the Iranian version of CSI‑24 showed its
high reliability and confirmatory factor analysis results show the model’s satisfactory fitting.
CONCLUSION: The Persian version of CSI‑24 is a useful self‑report tool for evaluating the physical
complaints of Iranian school adolescents aged between 12 and 18 years.

Keywords

1. Ruchkin V, Schwab‑Stone M. A longitudinal study of somatic
complaints in urban adolescents: The role of internalizing
psychopathology and somatic anxiety. J Youth Adolesc
2014;43:834‑45.
2. Witthöft M, Hiller W. Psychological approaches to origins and
treatments of somatoform disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol
2010;6:257‑83.
3. Lipowski ZJ. Somatization: The concept and its clinical
application. Am J Psychiatry 1988;145:1358‑68.
4. American Psychiatric Association. Cautionary statement for
forensic use of DSM‑5. In: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders. Vol. 5.Washington: Association AP; 2013.
5. Ghandour RM, Overpeck MD, Huang ZJ, Kogan MD, Scheidt PC.
Headache, stomachache, backache, and morning fatigue among
adolescent girls in the United States: Associations with behavioral,
sociodemographic, and environmental factors. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med 2004;158:797‑803.
6. Roth‑Isigkeit A, Thyen U, Raspe HH, Stöven H, Schmucker P.
Reports of pain among German children and adolescents: An
epidemiological study. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:258‑63.
7. Hinton D, Kirk S. Families’ and healthcare professionals’
perceptions of healthcare services for children and young people
with medically unexplained symptoms: A narrative review of the
literature. Health Soc Care Community 2016;24:12‑26.
8. van Geelen SM, Hagquist C. Are the time trends in adolescent
psychosomatic problems related to functional impairment in daily
life? A 23‑year study among 20,000 15‑16 year olds in Sweden. J
Psychosom Res 2016;87:50‑6.
9. Cozzi G, Ghirardo S, Fiorese I, Proietti I, Monasta L, Minute M,
et al. Risk of hospitalisation after early‑revisit in the emergency
department. J Paediatr Child Health 2017;53:850‑4.
10. Cerruti R, Spensieri V, Presaghi F, Valastro C, Fontana A, Guidetti
V. An exploratory study on internet addiction, somatic symptoms
and emotional and behavioral functioning in school‑aged
adolescents. Clin Neuropsychiatry 2017;14:374‑83.
11. Agnafors S, Norman Kjellström A, Torgerson J, Rusner M. Somatic comorbidity in children and adolescents with psychiatric
disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019;28:1517‑25.
12. Walker LS, Garber J, Greene JW. Somatization symptoms in
pediatric abdominal pain patients: Relation to chronicity of
abdominal pain and parent somatization. J Abnorm Child Psychol
1991;19:379‑94.
13. Walker LS, Beck JE, Garber J, Lambert W. Children’s Somatization
Inventory: Psychometric properties of the revised form (CSI‑24).
J Pediatr Psychol 2009;34:430‑40.
14. Lavigne JV, Saps M, Bryant FB. Reexamining the Factor structure
of somatization using the children’s somatization inventory
(CSI‑24) in a community sample. J Pediatr Psychol 2012;37:914‑24.
15. Hosseinkhani Z, Hassanabadi HR, Parsaeian M, Nedjat S,
Foroozanfar Z. The role of mental health, academic stress,
academic achievement, and physical activity on self‑rated health
among adolescents in Iran: A multilevel analysis. J Educ Health
Promot 2020;9:182.
16. Shahraki‑Sanavi F, Ansari‑Moghaddam A, Mohammadi M,
Bakhshani NM, Salehiniya H. Effectiveness of school‑based
mental health programs on mental health among adolescents. J
Educ Health Promot 2020;9:142.
17. Tabakhnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed.
Boston: Allyn and Bocon; 2007.
18. Kadıoğlu H, Sişman FN, Ergün A. Reliability and validity of the
turkish version of children’s somatization inventory. Asian Nurs
Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2012;6:9‑12.
19. Groth‑Marnat G. Handbook of Psychological Assessment. New
Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; 2009.
20. Modabernia M, Shojaie TH, Falahi M, Faghirpour M. Normalizing
SCL‑90‑R inventory in Guilan high‑school students. J Guilan Univ
Med Sci 2010;19:58‑65.
21. Essau CA, Olaya B, Bokszczanin A, Gilvarry C, Bray D. Somatic
symptoms among children and adolescents in Poland: A
confirmatory factor analytic study of the children somatization
inventory. Front Public Health 2013;1:72.
22. Litcher L, Bromet E, Carlson G, Gilbert T, Panina N,
Golovakha E, et al. Ukrainian application of the Children’s
Somatization Inventory: Psychometric properties and associations
with internalizing symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2001;29:165‑75