Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A Medical Certificate of Cause of Death (MCCD) is a vital document issued by a
doctor and has a prescribed format published by the World Health Organization. It is an essential
tool to obtain scientific and reliable information in terms of the cause of mortality. The aim of this
study is to assess the knowledge about MCCD and to evaluate the impact of sensitization training
on the MCCD among the physicians working in the trauma and emergency department in a Tertiary
Care Centre.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quasi‑experimental quality improvement hospital‑based study
executed in Trauma and Emergency Department of Tertiary Care Hospital in Chhattisgarh State,
India. The physicians posted in the Trauma and Emergency Department were participated in the
study and attended the sensitization training session on MCCD. Statistical analysis used; the data
were entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed with SPSS version 20 statistical software. Mean scores
and standard deviation (SD) were used for pre and posttest data while statistical significance was
tested using the paired t‑test. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. The technical and medical
errors in MCCD forms were depicted in percentages.
RESULTS: A total of 54 physicians completed the study, including 42 junior resident doctors, 6 senior
resident doctors, and 6 faculties. There was a significant difference in the scores before (M = 4.39,
SD = 1.571) and after (M = 7.5, SD = 0.885) the training (t = 17.6, P < 0.0001). The participants
showed substantial improvement by reduction in technical errors from 28% to 14% while the medical
error also slashed down from 42% to 16%.
CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization and educational training should be carried out consistently on regular
intervals to improve the knowledge of physicians regarding the appropriate filling of MCCD and
minimize the errors in MCCD, ultimately this will enhance usability and comparability of mortality
statistics generated from International Classification of Diseases data.
Keywords:
Death certificate, effectiveness of training, errors, medical certification of cause of deathBACKGROUND: A Medical Certificate of Cause of Death (MCCD) is a vital document issued by a
doctor and has a prescribed format published by the World Health Organization. It is an essential
tool to obtain scientific and reliable information in terms of the cause of mortality. The aim of this
study is to assess the knowledge about MCCD and to evaluate the impact of sensitization training
on the MCCD among the physicians working in the trauma and emergency department in a Tertiary
Care Centre.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quasi‑experimental quality improvement hospital‑based study
executed in Trauma and Emergency Department of Tertiary Care Hospital in Chhattisgarh State,
India. The physicians posted in the Trauma and Emergency Department were participated in the
study and attended the sensitization training session on MCCD. Statistical analysis used; the data
were entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed with SPSS version 20 statistical software. Mean scores
and standard deviation (SD) were used for pre and posttest data while statistical significance was
tested using the paired t‑test. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. The technical and medical
errors in MCCD forms were depicted in percentages.
RESULTS: A total of 54 physicians completed the study, including 42 junior resident doctors, 6 senior
resident doctors, and 6 faculties. There was a significant difference in the scores before (M = 4.39,
SD = 1.571) and after (M = 7.5, SD = 0.885) the training (t = 17.6, P < 0.0001). The participants
showed substantial improvement by reduction in technical errors from 28% to 14% while the medical
error also slashed down from 42% to 16%.
CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization and educational training should be carried out consistently on regular
intervals to improve the knowledge of physicians regarding the appropriate filling of MCCD and
minimize the errors in MCCD, ultimately this will enhance usability and comparability of mortality
statistics generated from International Classification of Diseases data.
Keywords
Aldakhil HA, Alghamdi AY, et al. Common errors in writing the
cause of death certificate in the Middle East. J Forensic Leg Med
2019;68:101864.
2. Physicians Manual on Medical Certification of Cause of Death.
Office of The Registrar General, India Government of India,
Ministry of Home Affairs, 2 A, Man Singh Road, New Delhi.
Available from: https://ncdirindia.org/emor/Download/
Physician’s_Manual_MCCD.pdf.[Last accessed on 2021 Apr 05].
3. Hazard RH, Chowdhury HR, Adair T, Ansar A, Quaiyum
Rahman AM, Alam S, et al. The quality of medical death
certification of cause of death in hospitals in rural Bangladesh:
Impact of introducing the International Form of Medical
Certificate of Cause of Death. BMC Health Serv Res
2017;17:688.
4. Maharjan L, Shah A, Shrestha KB, Shrestha G. Errors in
cause‑of‑death statement on death certificates in intensive care
unit of Kathmandu, Nepal. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:507.
5. Garg A, Singh SV, Gupta VK. Accuracy of medical certification
of the cause of death in a rural non‑teaching hospital in Delhi.
Natl Med J India 2012;25:185‑6.
6. Patel Amul B, Hitesh R, Himanshu R, Viren P. Assessment of
medical certificate of cause of death at a new teaching hospital
in Vadodara. NJCM 2011;3:349‑53.
7. Aung E, Rao C, Walker S. Teaching cause‑of‑death certification:
Lessons from international experience. Postgrad Med J
2010;86:143‑52.
8. Rampatige R, Mikkelsen L, Hernandez B, Riley I, Lopez AD.
Systematic review of statistics on causes of deaths in hospitals:
Strengthening the evidence for policy‑makers. Bull World Health
Organ 2014;92:807‑16.
9. Miki J, Rampatige R, Richards N, Adair T, Cortez‑Escalante J,
Vargas‑Herrera J. Saving lives through certifying deaths:
Assessing the impact of two interventions to improve cause of
death data in Perú. BMC Public Health 2018;18:1329.
10. Wood KA, Weinberg SH, Weinberg ML. Death certification
in Northern Alberta: Error occurrence rate and educational
intervention. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2020;41:11‑7.
11. Hart JD, Sorchik R, Bo KS, Chowdhury HR, Gamage S, Joshi R,
et al. Improving medical certification of cause of death: Effective
strategies and approaches based on experiences from the Data
for Health Initiative. BMC Med 2020;18:74.
12. Azim A, Singh P, Bhatia P, Baronia AK, Gurjar M, Poddar B,et al. Impact of an educational intervention on errors in death
certification: An observational study from the intensive care unit
of a tertiary care teaching hospital. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol
2014;30:78‑81.
13. Madsen A, Thihalolipavan S, Maduro G, Zimmerman R,
Koppaka R, Li W, et al. An intervention to improve cause‑of‑death
reporting in New York City hospitals, 2009‑2010. Prev Chronic
Dis 2012;9:E157.
14. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification
of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 10th Revision. Volume
2. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/
en/. [Last accessed on 2021 Apr 05].
15. Adeyinka A, Bailey K. Death Certification. 2020 Apr 30. In:
StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
16. Brooks EG, Reed KD. Principles and pitfalls: A guide to death
certification. Clin Med Res 2015;13:74‑82.
)