Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‑CoV‑2) has become
a public health concern worldwide. It is important for pregnant women to know about the mode of
transmission, symptoms, and preventive measures against COVID‑19. The aim of this study was
to evaluate the awareness and outlook of pregnant women and practical measures taken by them
against COVID‑19.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross‑sectional questionnaire‑based study was conducted for
1 month (June 10, 2020– July 10, 2020) in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India
Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. A prevalidated questionnaire was given to
109 pregnant women to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice acquired against COVID‑19
infection. The Chi‑square test or Fischer’s exact test was used to compare categorical data.
RESULTS: Among 109 participants, 103 (94.5%) had good knowledge, 4 (3.7%) had average
knowledge and 2 (1.8%) had poor knowledge about COVID‑19. Majority of them had a positive
attitude for the protective measures taken for the prevention of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Since there is no valid treatment for COVID‑19, prevention is the only key to curve
this infection. In the present study, 94.5% pregnant women had overall good knowledge score about
the ode of transmission, symptoms, and preventive measures against COVID‑19.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‑CoV‑2) has become
a public health concern worldwide. It is important for pregnant women to know about the mode of
transmission, symptoms, and preventive measures against COVID‑19. The aim of this study was
to evaluate the awareness and outlook of pregnant women and practical measures taken by them
against COVID‑19.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross‑sectional questionnaire‑based study was conducted for
1 month (June 10, 2020– July 10, 2020) in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India
Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. A prevalidated questionnaire was given to
109 pregnant women to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice acquired against COVID‑19
infection. The Chi‑square test or Fischer’s exact test was used to compare categorical data.
RESULTS: Among 109 participants, 103 (94.5%) had good knowledge, 4 (3.7%) had average
knowledge and 2 (1.8%) had poor knowledge about COVID‑19. Majority of them had a positive
attitude for the protective measures taken for the prevention of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Since there is no valid treatment for COVID‑19, prevention is the only key to curve
this infection. In the present study, 94.5% pregnant women had overall good knowledge score about
the mode of transmission, symptoms, and preventive measures against COVID‑19.

Keywords

1. Euro Surveillance Editorial T. Note from the editors: World
Health Organization Declares Novel Coronavirus (2019‑nCoV)
Sixth Public Health Emergency of International Concern.
Vol. 25. Euro Surveillance: Bulletin Europeen sur les Maladies
Transmissibles=European Communicable Disease Bulletin; 2020.
2. Li X, Zai J, Zhao Q, Nie Q, Li Yi, Foley BT, et al. Evolutionary
history, potential intermediate animal host, and cross‑species
analyses of SARS‑CoV‑2. J Med Virol 2020;92:602‑11.
3. Chan JF, Yuan S, Kok KH, Wang KK, Chu H, Yang J, et al.
A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel
coronavirus indicating person‑to‑person transmission: A study
of a family cluster. Lancet 2020;395:514‑52.
4. Meena SP, Jhirwal M, Puranik AK, Sharma N, Rodha MS,
Lodha M, Badkur M. Awareness and experience of health‑care
workers during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. J Educ Health
Promot 2021;10:110.
5. World Health Organization. Emerging Respiratory Viruses,
Including COVID‑19: Methods for Detection, Prevention,
Response, and Control. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2020. Available from: https://openwho.org/courses/
introduction‑to‑ncov: [Last accessed on 2020 Jun].
6. Qiao J. What are the risks of COVID‑19 infection in pregnant
women? Lancet 2020;395:760‑2.
7. Irani M, Pakfetrat A, Mask MK. Novel coronavirus disease 2019
and perinatal outcomes. J Educ Health Promot 2020;9:78.
8. Fell DB, Azziz‑Baumgartner E, Baker MG, Batra M, Beauté J,
Beutels P, et al. Influenza epidemiology and immunization during
pregnancy: Final report of a World Health Organization working
group. Vaccine 2017;35:5738‑50.
9. Novel Coronavirus; 2019. Available from: http://www.acog.
org/clinical‑guidance/practice advisory/article: [Last accessed
on 2020 Jun 02].
10. Zhu H, Wang L, Fang C, Peng S, Zhang L, Chang G, et al.
Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019‑nCoV
pneumonia. Transl Pediatr 2020;9:51‑60.
11. Available from: http://theconversation.com/coronavirus‑
pregnant‑women‑and‑infants‑new‑research‑136639. [Last
accessed on 2020 Jun 02].
12. Hosseini MS, Hosseini A, Ghaffari E, Radfar M, Shirvani F,
Tabatabai S, et al. Evaluation of clinical outcomes of neonates
born to mothers with coronavirus (COVID‑19) in Shahid Beheshti
Hospitals. J Edu Health Promot 2021;10:173.
13. Erfani A, Shahriarirad R, Ranjbar K, Mirahmadizadeh A,
Moghadami M. Knowledge, attitude and practice toward the
novel coronavirus (COVID‑19) outbreak: A population‑based
survey in Iran. Bull World Health Organ: [Last accessed on 2020
Mar 30].
14. Qiao Y, Wang J, Li J, Wang J. Effects of depressive and anxiety
symptoms during pregnancy on pregnant, obstetric and neonatal
outcomes: A follow‑up study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;32:237‑40.
15. Field T, Diego M, Hernandez‑Reif M, Figueiredo B, Deeds O,
Ascencio A, et al. Comorbid depression and anxiety effects on pregnancy and neonatal outcome. Infant Behav Dev 2010;33:23‑9.
16. Available from: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life‑styl
e/parenting /pregnancy/coronavirus‑risk‑what‑should‑
pregnant ‑women‑know‑about‑covid‑19/articleshow /74443632:
[Last accessed on 2020 Jun 02].
17. MarkelH, LipmanHB, NavarroJA, SloanA, MichalsenJR, SternAM,
et al. Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities
during the 1918‑1919 influenza pandemic. JAMA 2007;298:644‑54.