Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Evangelia Manou
- . Evgenia Charikleia Lazari
- . Geοrgia Eleni Thomopoulou
- . Georgios Agrogiannis
- . Nikolaos G. Kavantzas
- . Andreas C. Lazaris
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recordings of live streaming e‑lessons of pathology at medical school of National
and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece are uploaded to the e‑class portfolio of each student
enrolled in the course. We measured the number of views each video received and noticed that this
number exceeded the number of enrolled students. Our main aim was to investigate the correlation
between the upload of an educational video and the views it got so as to determine when the proper
time is for professors to e‑share or upload an educational video for the students.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured the number of views of the recorded e‑lessons when
all videos were uploaded, with a frequency of 15 days. We used analysis of variances statistical
analysis to find the significance of the amount of time each video had been uploaded on the virtual
platform of the course. We also applied t‑tests to assess the significance of alteration of the number
of views related to the amount of time until the examinations.
RESULTS: Time was a statistically significant factor in the impact of an educational video. The
two‑factor analysis without interaction measured P ≃ 0.001, proving the strong correlation between
time and the increase of views. As the examination date was approaching, there was a statistically
significant increase in the number of views of the videotaped e‑lessons. Almost 50% of the views of
each of the videos took place in the two‑week examination period of the course.
CONCLUSIONS: The educational videos that contained the core learning concepts of the pathology
course should be uploaded first. The complex learning points of the pathology course must be
available at the beginning of the semester. Additionally, recordings of videos covering the complex
learning points of the course should be uploaded as an additional tool of asynchronous e‑learning
for the students who choose to watch their former e‑lessons to prepare for the examinations.
Keywords
- Patel AB, Shah SV. Evaluation of medical student program with
the use of a reflective portfolio: A qualitative study. J Educ Health
Promot 2021;10:259. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1333_20.
2. Donkin R, Askew E, Stevenson H. Video feedback and e‑Learning
enhances laboratory skills and engagement in medical laboratory
science students. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:310. doi: 10.1186/
s12909‑019‑1745‑1.
3. Oseni Z, Than HH, Kolakowska E, Chalmers L ,
Hanboonkunupakarn B, McGready R. Video‑based feedback as
a method for training rural healthcare workers to manage medical
emergencies: A pilot study. BMC Med Educ 2017;17:179. doi:
10.1186/s12909‑017‑0975‑3.
4. Lowenthal PR, Fiock HS, Shreaves DL, Belt ES. Investigating
Students’ Perceptions of Screencasting Style of Video Feedback
in Online Courses. TechTrends. 2022;66 (2):265‑275. doi: 10.1007/
s11528‑021‑00665‑x.
5. Dong C, Sun Goh P. Twelve tips for the effective use of videos in
medical education. Med Teach 2015;37:140‑5.
6. Singh V, Supehia S, Gupta PK, Narula H, Sharma M, Devi K,
et al. Effectiveness of video modules in infection control trainings
during COVID‑19 pandemic: A quasi‑experimental study in
tertiary care institute. J Educ Health Promot 2021:10:183. doi:
10.4103/jehp.jehp_1009_20.
7. Islam M, Kim D, Kwon M. A comparison of two forms of
instruction: Pre‑recorded video lectures vs. Live ZOOM lectures
for education in the business management field. Sustainability
2020;12:8149. doi: 10.3390/su12198149.
8. Brockfeld T, Muller B, de Laffolie J. Video versus live lecture
courses: A comparative evaluation of lecture types and results. - Med Educ Online 2018;23:1‑7.
9. Kalwitzki M, Meller C, Beyer C. Does teaching method affect
students’ perceptions regarding communication patterns in
pediatric dentistry? A comparison of lecture and video methods.
J Dent Educ 2011;75:1084‑91.
10. Green AR, Whitburn YL, Zacharias A, Byrne G, Hughes LD. The
relationship between student engagement with online content
and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course. Anat
Sci Educ 2017;11:471‑7.
11. Pathipati AS, Azad TD, Jethwani K. Telemedical education:
Training digital natives in telemedicine. J Med Internet Res
2016;18:e193. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5534.
12. de Wet C, Yelland M. The challenges and opportunities in medical
education for digital ‘natives’ and ‘immigrants’ in Scotland and
abroad. Scott Med J 2015;60:152‑4.
13. Popovici A, Mironov C. Students’ perception on using
eLearning technologies. Procedia‑Social and Behavioral Sciences
2015;180:1514‑9.
14. Prober CG, Khan S. Medical education reimagined: A call to
action. Acad Med 2013;88:1407‑10.
15. Srinivasan DK. Medical students perceptions and an anatomy
teacher’s personal experience using an e‑learning platform for
tutorials during the covid‑19 crisis. Anat Sci Educ 2020;13:315‑6.
16. Government Gazette of the Hellenic Republic 3707/
Issue B/4‑9‑2020. Available from: http://www.
et.gr/idocs‑nph/search/pdfViewerForm.html?args
=5C7QrtC22wHUdWr4xouZundtvSoClrL89yHYf254ryX
3U4LPcASlceJIn J48_97uHrMts-zFzeyCiBSQOpYnTy36
MacmUFCx2ppFvBej56Mmc8Qdb8ZfRJqZnsIAdk8Lv_
e6czmhEembNmZCMxLMtfilLkS_qXSzaDkEnGIlHulMNtKodjVrLEnF9TO5ncg. Accessed May 4, 2022
17. Riccioni O, Vrasidas C, Brcic L, Armenski G, Seiwerth S, Smeets A,
et al. Acquiring experience in pathology predominantly from what
you see, not from what you read: The HIPON e‑learning platform.
Adv Med Educ Pract 2015;6:439‑45.
18. LazarisAC, RiccioniO, SolomouM. Nikolakopoulos I. VemmouE.
Karamaroudis S, et al. Implementation of Experiential Learning
in Pathology: Impact of Hipon Project Concept and Attainment.
Int Arch Med 2015;8:1‑7
19. Young JQ, Van Merrienboer J, Durning S, Ten Cate O. Cognitive
load theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE Guide
No 86. Med Teach 2014;36:371‑84.
20. Issa N, Schuller M, Santacaterina S, Shapiro M, Wang E, MayerRE,
et al. Applying multimedia design principles enhances learning
in medical education. Med Educ 2011;45:818‑26.
21. Brame CJ. Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines
for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Sci
Educ 2016;15:es6.
22. Allen WA, Smith AR. Effects of video podcasting on
psychomotor and cognitive performance, attitudes and study
behavior of student physical therapists. Innov Educ Teach Int
2012;49:401–14.
23. Kay RH. Exploring the use of video podcasts in education:
A comprehensive review of the literature. Comput Human Behav
2012;28:820–31.
24. Rackaway C. Video killed the textbook star? Use of multimedia
supplements to enhance student learning. J Pol Sci Educ
2012;8:189–200.
25. Howell DC. Statistical Methods for Psychology. 8th ed. Cengage
Learning; 2012
26. Friedman AJ, Cosby R, Boyko S, Hatton‑Bauer J, Turnbull G.
Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for
patient education: A systematic review and practice guideline
recommendations. J Cancer Educ 2011;26:12‑21.
27. Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health
professional education: Design principles and strategies. Med
Educ 2010;44:85‑93.
28. Ghanbari S, Haghani F, Barekatain M, Jamali A. A systematized
review of cognitive load theory in health sciences education and
a perspective from cognitive neuroscience. J Educ Health Promot
2020;9:176. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_643_19.
29. Ibrahim M, Antonenko PD, Greenwood CM, Wheeler D. Effects of
segmenting, signaling, and weeding on learning from educational
video. Learning Media Technology 2012;37:220‑35.
30. McNulty JA, Hoyt A, Chandrasekhar AJ, Espiritu B, Gruener G,
Ron PJ, et al. A three‑year study of lecture multimedia utilization
in the medical curriculum: Associations with performances in the
basic sciences. Med Sci Educ 2011;21:29–36.
)