Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Given the growing trend of aging and the limited resources of the health
system, the lack of long‑term prior government planning, and reduced growth of the productive force
of society, identifying strategies for planning and action to deal with future aging is very important.
In this regard, the study was conducted to identify strategies for dealing with the aging population
from the perspective of health system experts.
METHODS: The qualitative content analysis study was performed on 29 Iranian male and female
experts in the aging and health scope from Isfahan, Tehran, Tabriz, and Babol who purposefully
participated in the semi‑structured interview. Data were classified by qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Two concepts emerged according to the participated experts’ opinions, regarding the
strategies of the Iranian health system in dealing with future aging: “executive policy” strategies,
including “design, planning and implementation,” “evaluation and standardization,” “strengthening
demand‑driven” and “modeling national and international experiences,” “preventive policies”
strategy, which includes “Focus on prevention,” “Focus on values and competencies,” “Educational
empowerment,” “Knowledge‑based empowerment,” “Empowerment of age‑related groups,”
“Economic empowerment,” and “Social support.”
CONCLUSION: The diversity and breadth of the mentioned strategies indicate the necessity
of comprehensive readiness and adaptation of health services to the elderly conditions and
characteristics. Purposeful planning and timely implementation of programs and policies to better
address the health system with future aging will be possible by using practical strategies.

Keywords

1. WHO (World Health Organization). Global Health and Ageing.
Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.
2. Khodamoradi A, Hassanipour S, Daryabeigi Khotbesara R,
Ahmadi B. The trend of population agingand planning of health
services for the elderly: A review study. J Torbat Heydariyeh Univ
Med Sci 2018;6:81‑95.
3. WHO (World Health Organization). Global Consultation on
Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) – The Path to Universal
Health Coverage: Report of Consultation Meeting. Berlin,
Germany Switzerland: World Health Organization, Course
DoAaL; 2018.
4. Singh B, Kiran U. Recreational activities for senior citizens. IOSR
J Human Soc Sci 2014;19:24‑30.
5. SCo I (Statistical Center of Iran); 2017. Available from: SCo I
(Statistical Center of Iran); 2017. Available from: https://www.
amar.org.ir/english. [Last accessed on 2022 Mar 13].
6. Darabi R, Tarkashvand M. Socio‑economic consequences of
population aging. Soc Sci 2012;1:17‑28.
7. Ahmadi Timurlui A. Analyzing the Health Policies of the Elderly
in the Country and Providing a Model. PhD Thesis in Health
Policy, Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2014.
8. De Biasi A, Wolfe M, Carmody J, Fulmer T, Auerbach J.
Creating an age‑friendly public health system. Innov Aging
2020;4(1):igz044.
9. Thinley S. Health and care of an ageing population: Alignment of
health and social systems to address the need. J Health Manage
2021;23(1):109‑18.
10. GholipourZ, Farahani MM, Riahi L, Hajinabi K. Priorities of active
aging policy in Iran. Depiction Health 2020;11:52‑61.
11. Mudge AM, Young A, McRae P, Graham F, Whiting E,
Hubbard RE. Qualitative analysis of challenges and enablers
to providing age friendly hospital care in an Australian health
system. BMC Geriatr 2021;21:147.
12. Barry S, Fhallúin MN, Thomas S, Harnett PJ, Burke S.
Implementing integrated care in practice – Learning from MDTs
driving the integrated care programme for older persons in
Ireland. Int J Integr Care 2021;21:15.
13. Chen Z, Yu J, Song Y, Chui D. Aging Beijing: Challenges
and strategies of health care for the elderly. Ageing Res Rev
2010;9 Suppl 1:S2‑5.
14. Azad Armaki T, Koosheshi M, Parvaei S. Critical approach to
commodification of health and exclusion of the poor elderly.
Q Soc Stud Res Iran 2021;10:175‑212.
15. Nascimento RC, Álvares J, Guerra Junior AA, Gomes IC,
Silveira MR, Costa EA, et al. Polypharmacy: A reality in the
primary health care of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Rev
Saude Publ 2017;51 Suppl 2:19s.
16. Reynolds K, Medved M, Mackenzie CS, Funk LM, Koven L. Older
adults’ narratives of seeking mental health treatment: Making sense of mental health challenges and “muddling through” to
care. Qual Health Res 2020;30:1517‑28.
17. Dwolatzky T, Brodsky J, Azaiza F, Clarfield AM, Jacobs JM,
Litwin H. Coming of age: Health‑care challenges of an ageing
population in Israel. Lancet 2017;389:2542‑50.
18. Feng Z, Glinskaya E, Chen H, Gong S, Qiu Y, Xu J, et al. Long‑term
care system for older adults in China: Policy landscape, challenges,
and future prospects. Lancet 2020;396:1362‑72.
19. HanY, HeY, LyuJ, YuC, BianM, LeeL. Aging in China: Perspectives
on Public Health. Global Health Journal. 2020;1;4(1):11‑7.
20. Imani A. Dastgiri S, Azizi Zinal Hajlu A. Population aging and
disease burden (review study). J Health Image 2015;6:54‑61.
21. Sivakumar PT, Harbishettar V, Antony S, Thirumoorthy A.
Creating age friendly health systems in India: Challenges and
opportunities. J Geriatr Care Res 2018;5:1‑2.
22. Russell M, Ardalan A. The future of aging and the cost of
health services: A warning for the health system. Iran J Aging
2007;2:300‑5.
23. Voumard R, Rubli Truchard E, Benaroyo L, Borasio GD, Büla C,
Jox RJ. Geriatric palliative care: A view of its concept, challenges
and strategies. BMC Geriatr 2018;18:220.
24. Buyl R, Beogo I, Fobelets M, Deletroz C, Van Landuyt P,
Dequanter S, et al. e‑Health interventions for healthy aging:
A systematic review. Syst Rev 2020;9:128.