Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Huma Farid
- . Tania A. Siddiqui 1
- . Rashna H. Sukhia 2
- . Sana Jalil Hasan
- . Ayesha Naveed 3
- . Lubna Pasha
1 Department of Orthodontics, Foundation University College of Dentistry and Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan
2 Department of Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
3 Department of Medical Education, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry,Lahore, Pakistan
Abstract
BACKGROUND: “Should students keep their webcams on or off during synchronous online classes?”
is an unanswered question with educators’ opinions divided on this aspect. Along with educators’
perspectives, it is also important to unfold students’ perspectives on this question. The objectives
of this study were to determine the routine and opinion of students’ regarding webcam usage and
identification of students’ reasons for not using webcams during online learning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross‑sectional study was carried out at Margalla Institute of Health
Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Census was done for data collection by including all dental students(n=180)
enrolled at the institute attending synchronous online preclinical and clinical operative dentistry classes.
Data collection was carried out using a self‑administrated questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was used to
describe survey item responses. Pair‑wise differences between demographic categories (female vs. male,
and preclinical vs. clinical) were analyzed using the Pearson Chi‑Square test. Correlation of routine and
opinion with students’ reasons were done using Spearman correlation. Ordinal regression analysis was
done to associate routine and opinion with reasons. The level of significance (P value) was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: Out of 180 students, 141 submitted the survey form, with a response rate of 77.47%. The
majority of the students (n = 117, 83%) used to keep their webcams off during online classes and
were (n = 69, 48.9%) of the opinion that webcams should be kept off during online classes. The most
common reasons for keeping the webcam off during online classes were “comfort” (n = 87, 61.7%)
and “distractions” (n = 84, 59.6%). A statistically significant association of gender was obtained, with
females more likely than males due to distraction, self‑consciousness, and appearance (P = 0.000,
0.003, and 0.016, respectively). The odds of gender highly influenced routine use of cameras, and
this was statistically significant (OR: 3.478, P = 0.011). Students tended to keep their webcam off
when they were inattentative during online classes (OR; 3.743, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The majority of the students did not agree to keep the webcam on during online
synchronous learning. The main reasons for students’ reluctance to keep the webcam on were
self‑consciousness, surrounding consciousness, distractions, and technological issues. Students
can be encouraged to turn the webcam on by framing strategies according to students' concerns.
Keywords
Maleki M, et al. Validity and reliability of a virtual education
satisfaction questionnaire from the perspective of cardiology
residents during the COVID‑19 pandemic. J Educ Health Promot
2021;10:291.
2. Mohebbi B, Sadeghipour P, Noohi F, Maleki M, Peighambari MM,
Hosseini S, et al. Reliability and validity of a satisfaction
questionnaire on virtual education in the coronavirus disease
2019 pandemic era aimed at cardiology faculty members. J Educ
Health Promot 2022;11:45.
3. Mortazavi F, SalehabadiR, Sharifzadeh M, Ghardashi F. Students’
perspectives on the virtual teaching challenges in the COVID‑19
pandemic: A qualitative study. J Educ Health Promot 2021;10:59.
4. Rajab M, Gazal A, Alkattan K. Challenges to online medical
education during the COVID 19 pandemic. Cureus 2020;12:e8966.
doi: 10.7759/cureus. 8966.
5. Farooq F, Rathore FA, Mansoor SN. Challenges of online medical
education in Pakistan during COVID‑19 pandemic. J Coll
Physicians Surg Pak 2020;30:67–9.
6. Mahul‑Mellier A‑L. Screams on a zoom call: The theory of
homeworking with kids meets reality. Nature 2020. doi: https://
doi.org/10.1038/d41586‑020‑01296‑7.
7. Costa K. Cameras be damned. LinkedIn. 2020. Available from:
www.linkedin.com/pulse/cameras‑damned‑karen‑costa/. [Last
accesed on 2020 Jun 30].
8. Huckins JF, Alex W, Wang W, Hedlund E, Rogers C, Wu J, et al.
Mental health and behavior of college students during the early
phases of the COVID‑19 pandemic : Longitudinal smartphone and ecological momentary assessment study. J Med Internet Res
2020;22:e20185.
9. Mottet T. Students nonverbal communication and its influence on
teachers and teaching. In: Chesebro IJL, McCroskey JC, editors.
Communication for Teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.; 2002.
p. 47–61.
10. Oregon State University C for T and L. Zoom camera pros &
cons [Infographic]. Available from: https://oregonstate.app.
box.com/s/j6vcszazsgaq3ikyqkcxc4s51pueb53h. [Last accesed
on 2021 Jul 02].
11. MattR.Shouldshowingfacesbemandatory?Anewquestionposed
by technology. 2020. Available from: https://www.insidehighered.
com/blogs/confessions‑community‑college‑dean/
should‑showing‑faces‑be‑mandatory#.YMN1xyA331M.link.
12. Gherhes V, Simon S, Para L. Analysing students ’ reasons
for keeping their webcams on or off during online classes.
Sustainability 2021;13:3203.
13. Castelli Frank R, Sarvary MA. Why students do not turn on their
video camerasduring online classes andan equitable andinclusive
plan to encourage them to do so. Ecol Evol 2021;11:3565‑76.
14. Wunder I, Bedenlier S, Wunder I, Gläser‑zikuda M, Kammerl R,
Kopp B, et al. Generation invisible. Higher education
students’ (non) use of webcams in synchronous online learning.
2020.
15. Moses T. 5 reasons to let students keep their cameras off
during Zoom classes. The conversation. 2020. Available
from: https://theconversation.com/5‑reasons‑to‑let‑students
‑keep‑their‑cameras‑off‑during‑zoom‑classes‑144111. [Last
accessed on 2022 Mar 18].
16. Do J. Understanding instructors’ synchronous online design
activity. University of Tennessee, Knoxville; 2018. Available from:
https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/5009.
17. Costa K. Cameras be damned. LinkedIn. 2020. Available from:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cameras‑damned‑karen‑
costa/. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 30].
18. Rovai AP. Development of an instrument to measure classroom
community. Internet High Educ 2002;5:197–211.
19. Tayebinik M, Puteh M. Sense of community : How important is
this quality in blended courses. In: Proceeding of the International
Conference on Education and Management Innovation.
Singapore; 2012.
20. Corso M, Bundick M, Quaglia R, Haywood D. Where student,
teacher, and content meet: Student engagement in the secondary
school classroom. Am Second Educ 2013;41:50–61.
21. Chatterjee R, Correia A. Online students’ attitudes toward
collaborative learning and sense of community. Am J Distance
Educ 2020;34:53–68.
22. Lewis KA. A digital immigrant venture into teaching online: an
autoethnographic account of a classroom teacher transformed.
Qual Rep. 2018;23(7):1752-72. https://doi.org/10.46743/21603715/2018.3036
23. Co‑Teaching strategies for remote learning. The Albert
team. 2021. Available from: https://www.albert.io/blog/
coteaching‑remote‑learning/. [Last accessed on 2021 Jul 04].
24. Emdin C. For White Folks Who Teach in the Hood… and the Rest
Of Ya’ll Too: Reality Pedagogy and Urban Education. Boston, MA:
Beacon Press; 2016.
25. Shearer R, Aldemir T, Hitchcock J, Resig J, Driver J, Kohler M.
What students want: A vision of a future online learning
experience grounded in distance education theory. Am J Distance
Educ 2020;34:36–52.
26. Khan RA, Atta K, Sajjad M, Jawaid M. Twelve tips to enhance
students engagement in synchronous online teaaching and
learning. Med Teach. 2022 June;44(6):601-06. https://doi.org/1
0.1080/0142159X.2021.1912310. [Epub 2021 Apr 20].
27. Goshtasbpour F, Swinnerton BJ, Pickering JD. Twelve
tips for engaging learners in online discussion. Med Tech.
2022 Mar;44(3):244-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/014215
9X.2021.1898571. [Epub 2021 Mar 17].
28. Bigdeli S, Kaufman D. Digital games in health professions
education : Advantages, disadvantages, and game engagement
factors. Med J Islam Repub Iran Med 2017;31:117.
29. Dousay T. Teaching in a digital age. Q Rev Distance Educ
2015;16:99.
)