Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Fateme Ahmadi Rezamahaleh
- . Talat Khadivzadeh 1
- . Seyed Mohsen Asgharinekah 2
- . Habibollah Esmaeili 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 PH.D in Biostatistics, Professor, Social Department of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Many infertile people have heard about adoption, but little is known about the true
meaning of adoption and how it is accepted. Giving the right information about adoption is effective
in making the right decision for couples. As a result, there is a need to intervene and provide training
to improve community attitudes and increase adoption among infertile people. Therefore, the present
study aimed to determine the effect of two counseling methods (face‑to‑face and telephone) on
awareness and attitude toward adoption in infertile couples.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study is a randomized quasi‑experimental study of two
groups in the Milad Infertility Center of Mashhad on 34 (each group of 17 couples) infertile couples
with the criteria to enter the study. Couples were randomly assigned to two telephone and face‑to‑face
counseling groups, and each individual’s awareness and attitudes toward adoption were completed
separately before and after counseling. The average number of face‑to‑face sessions for face‑to‑face
counseling was three 60‑min sessions and six 30‑min sessions for telephone counseling.
RESULTS: Based on the results of t‑test, there was a statistically significant difference between
the average score of awareness of adoption before and after the intervention (2 weeks after the
last counseling session), in infertile couples in face‑to‑face training group and in telephone training
group (P < 0.0001). The score of the attitude toward adoption before counseling in the face‑to‑face
counseling group was 60.55 ± 5.5, which reached 66.76 ± 4.7 after counseling. Based on the results
of the T‑pair test, this difference was significant (P < 0.0001). In addition, in the telephone counseling
group, the score of attitude toward adoption increased from 59.53. 7.4 to 67.73 ± 7.5, which was a
significant difference in terms of t‑pair test. The mean score of attitudes toward adoption was not
statistically significant in the two groups (P = 0.653).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that both counseling methods (face to face and
telephone) increase the level of awareness and attitude of couples about adoption, but neither
method was superior to the other.
Keywords
of life, a cross‑ sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:OC13‑5.
2. Bokaie M, Simbar M, Yassini AS, Alavi MH. How Infertility
Effects on Sexual Function of Infertile Couples. Advances in
nursing and midwifery (faculty of nursing of midwifery quarter.
2016;25(91):47‑56.
3. Fayaz E, Aghamohammadian Sharbaf H, Alipor A, Aliakbari
Dehkordi M. The efficacy of adoption skills training on stress
reduction and change of coping styles among couples who are
applicants for having an adopted child. Journal of Fundamentals
of Mental Health, 2012; 14(55): 19‑210. doi: 10.22038/jfmh.2012.938
4. Bahrami M, Taghipour A, Abbasi Shavazi J. The influence of social
network on couples’ intention to have the first child. Int J Reprod
Biomed 2013;11:209‑18.
5. Savadzadeh S, Madadzadeh N. Explain psychological infertility
patients: A qualitative study. Journal of illam university of
medical sciencise 2013;21(1)1:16‑24.
6. Golshani F, MirghafourvandM, Hasanpour S, Seiiedi BiaragL. The
effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on anxiety and depression
in Iranian infertile women: A systematic and meta‑analytical
review, Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci 2020;14:e96715.
7. Kordi M, Fakari FR, Mazloum SR, Khadivzadeh T, Akhlaghi F,
Tara M. Comparison of the effect of web‑based, simulation‑based,
and conventional training on the accuracy of visual estimation
of postpartum hemorrhage volume on midwifery students:
A randomized clinical trial. J Educ Health Promot 2016;5:22.
8. Mazaheri MM. Comparison of mental health in couples with
fertility and infertile couples. ZJRMS 2012;14:72‑5.
9. Datta J, Palmer MJ, Tanton C, Gibson LJ, Jones KG, Macdowall W,
et al. Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000
women and men, Human Reproduction, Volume 31, Issue 9,
September 2016, Pages 2108–2118.
10. Bokaie M, Farajkhoda T, Enjezab B, Heidari P, Karimi Zarchi M.
Barriers of child adoption in infertile couples: Iranian’s views.
Iran J Reprod Med 2012;10:429‑34.
11. Yassini SM, Taghavi Shavazi M, Taghavi Shavazi N. Factors
associated with adoption acceptance rate from the view point of
infertile couples. Iran J Reprod Med 2012;10:413‑8.
12. Bevc V, Jerman J, Ovsenik R, Ovsenik M. Experiencing
infertility‑social work dilemmas in child adoption procedures.
Coll Antropol 2003;27:445‑60.
13. Khanjari Aliabadi A, Seifi Elmi Y. doption study in jurisprudence
and Iranian law. Ghanonyar J Civil Legal Sci 2017;1 (1):11‑33.
14. Omosun AO, Kofoworola O. Knowledge, attitude and practice
towards child adoption amongst women attending infertility
clinics in Lagos State, Nigeria: Original research. Afr Prim Health
Care Fam Med 2011;3:1‑8.
15. Adewunmi AA, Etti EA, Tayo AO, Rabiu KA, Akindele RA,
Ottun TA, et al. Factors associated with acceptability of child
adoption as a management option for infertility among women
in a developing country. Int J Womens Health 2012;4:365‑72.
16. Nwobodo EI, Isah YA. Knowledge, attitude and practice of child
adoption among infertile female patients in Sokoto North‑West
Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2011;18:272‑5.
17. Ezenwankwo FC, Roberts AA, Balogun MR. Acceptability of child
adoption in the management of infertility: A survey of women
attending fertility clinics in the tertiary facilities in Lagos. J Clin
Sci 2014;11:35.
18. Bell AV . Beyond (financial) accessibility: Inequalities within the
medicalisation of infertility. Sociol Health Illn. 2010;32:631-646.
19. Kheirkhah M, Vahedi M, Janani P. The effect of group counseling
on coping with infertility infertile women referred to the clinic of
Tabriz. IJOGI 2014;17:14‑7.
20. Zargar Shoushtari S, Afshari P, Abedi P, Tabesh H. The effect
of face‑to‑face with telephone‑based counseling on sexual
satisfaction among reproductive aged women in Iran. J Sex Marital
Ther 2015;41:361‑7.
21. Rodda S, Lubman D. Ready to change: A scheduled telephone
counselling programme for problem gambling. Australas
Psychiatry 2012;20:338‑42.
22. Park EJ. Telehealth technology in case/disease management.
Lippincotts Case Manag 2006;11:175‑82.
23. Narjes A. The Effect of Telephone Support on Nausea during
Pregnancy and Marital Satisfaction in Women. Mashhad, Iran:
Mashhad University Medical of Sciences; 2013.
24. Bartlam B, McLeod J. Infertility counselling: The ISSUE experience
of setting up a telephone counselling service. Patient Educ Couns
2000;41:313‑21.
25. CovingtonSN, BurnsLH. Infertility Counseling: AComprehensive
Handbook for Clinicians. Informa Healthcare; 1 edition.
Cambridge University Press; 2006.
26. Stammer H, Wischmann T, Verres R. Counseling and couple
therapy for infertile couples. Fam Process 2002;41:111‑22.
27. Kilfedder C, Power K, Karatzias T, McCafferty A, Niven K,
Chouliara Z, et al. A randomized trial of face‑to‑face counselling
versus telephone counselling versus bibliotherapy for occupational
stress. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract 2010;83:223‑42.
28. Salehi S, Bagheri Motlagh N. Comparative study of adoption in
the legal system of Iran and France with an approach to the law
on protection of orphans approved in 1974. Jurisprudence Fam
Law (Nedaye Sadegh) 2016;21(64):85‑107.
29. Campbell LC, Keefe FJ, Scipio C, McKee DC, Edwards CL,
Herman SH, et al. Facilitating research participation and
improving quality of life for African American prostate
cancer survivors and their intimate partners. A pilot study of
telephone‑based coping skills training. Cancer 2007;109:414‑24.
)