Journal of Education and Health Promotion

Ayurveda students’ perception toward online learning during the COVID‑19 pandemic

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

. Gaurav Sawarkar
. Punam Sawarkar 1
. Vaishali Kuchewar 2

1 Department of Rachana Sharir and Panchakarma

2 Kayachikitsa, Mahatma Gandhi Ayurved College, Hospital and Research Centre, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India

Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The recent pandemic of COVID‑19 is very challenging for each and every sector
like health, economic, technology, agriculture, industries, and education. In the field of education, a
teaching institute or a university is suffering in regard to syllabus completion, clinical postings, and
examinations which eventually ends up in huge academic loss. Thus, to minimize the academic loss
and facilitate the students in distance education, online learning was the solution; in spite of various
challenges, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University) have implemented
the online learning program for the undergraduate students within a week of lockdown.
METHODOLOGY: The survey was conducted at MGACH&RC, total of 189 students have participated
in the survey. Data collected by survey with help of feedback on a 5‑point Likert scale questionnaire
with close‑ and open‑ended questions and focus group discussion (FGD) with students.
DISCUSSION: Although the program was implemented to verify the utility, accomplishment, and
lacunas of e‑learning, the survey was planned to assess the perception of students toward online
learning during the COVID‑19 pandemic. The e‑learning model has been successfully introduced;
there are more requirements from the students regarding the resource material and minimal lacunas
regarding the skill of faculty members and technical issues. Students appreciate the online learning
module for the pandemic situation and necessitated for the combination of both learning modalities
in future. Seamlessly, the running program recommended online assessment and evaluation of the
students in future.

Keywords

COVID‑19
e‑learning
online learning
1. Burgess S, Sievertsen HH. Schools, Skills, and Learning: The
Impact of COVID‑19 on Education; 2020. Available from: https://
voxeu.org/article/impact‑covid‑19‑education. [Last accessed on
2020 Jun 07].
2. Rethinking Education Post‑Coronavirus: Lessons from
Spain to Avoid Widening the Socioeconomic Achievement
Gap; 2020. Available from: http://uis.unesco.org/en/blog/
rethinking‑education‑post‑coronavirus‑lessons‑spain‑avoidwidening‑socioeconomic‑achievement. [Last accessed on 2020
Jun 07].
3. Walsh S, De Villiers MR, Golakai VK. Introducing an e‑learning
solution for medical education in Liberia. Ann Glob Health
2018;84:190‑7.
4. Heuberger R, Clark WA. Synchronous delivery of online graduate
education in clinical nutrition: An inquiry into student perceptions
and preferences. J Allied Health 2019;48:61‑6.
5. Novak JD. The promise of new ideas and new technology for
improving teaching and learning. Cell Biol Educ 2003;2:122‑32.
6. Bolarinwa OA. Principles and Methods of Validity and Reliability
Testing of Questionnaires Used in Social and Health Science
Researches. Available from: http://www.npmj.org/article.asp
?issn=1117‑1936;year=2015;volume=22;issue=4;spage=195;epag
e=201;aulast=Bolarinwa#ref12. [Last accessed on 2020 Jun 07].
7. www.ETGovernment.com. COVID‑19 Pandemic: Impact and
Strategies for Education Sector in India‑ET Government. Available
from: https://government.economictimes.indiatimes.com/
news/education/covid‑19‑pandemic‑impact‑and‑strategies‑f
or-education‑sector‑in‑india/75173099. [Last accessed on 2020
Jun 07].
8. Strengths and Weaknesses of Online Learning‑ION Professional
eLearning Programs‑UIS. Available from: https://www.uis.
edu/ion/resources/tutorials/online‑education‑overview/
strengths‑and‑weaknesses/. [Last accessed on 2020 Jun 07].
9. Alhomod S, Shafi MM. success factors of e‑learning projects:
Atechnical perspective. Turk Online J Educ Technol 2013;12:247‑53.
10. Soong MH, Chan HC, Chua BC, Loh KF. Critical success factors
for on‑line course resources. Comput Educ 2001;36:101‑20.
11. Ali NS, Hodson‑Carlton K, Ryan M. Students’ perceptions
of online learning: Implications for teaching. Nurse Educ
2004;29:111‑5.
12. Lavy S, Ayuob W. Teachers’ sense of meaning associations with
teacher performance and graduates’ resilience: A study of schools
serving students of low socio‑economic status. Front Psychol
2019;10:823.
13. Pobiner B. Accepting, understanding, teaching, and
learning (human) evolution: Obstacles and opportunities. Am J
Phys Anthropol 2016;159:S232‑74.
14. Zoom for Online Learning Updates: Expanded Access
f o r S c h o o l s . Z o o m B l o g ; 2 0 2 0 . A v a i l a b l e f r o m :
https://blog.zoom.us/wordpress/2020/03/29/
how‑to‑use‑zoom‑for‑online‑learning/. [Last accessed on 2020
May 07].
15. Almaghaslah D, Ghazwani M, Alsayari A, Khaled A. Pharmacy
students’ perceptions towards online learning in a Saudi
Pharmacy School. Saudi Pharm J 2018;26:617‑21.
16. Jamali SS, Shiratuddin MF, Wong KW, Oskam CL. Utilising
mobile‑augmented reality for learning human anatomy. Procedia
Soc Behav Sci 2015;197:659‑68.
17. Attardi SM, Barbeau ML, Rogers KA. Improving online
interactions: Lessons from an online anatomy course with
a laboratory for undergraduate students. Anat Sci Educ 2018;11:592‑604.
18. Turkyilmaz I, Hariri NH, Jahangiri L. Student’s perception of the
impact of e‑learning on dental education. J Contemp Dent Pract
2019;20:616‑21.
19. Advantages and Disadvantages of eLearning. eLearning
Industry; 2017. Available from: https://elearningindustry.com/
advantages‑and‑disadvantages‑of‑elearning. [Last accessed on
2020 May 07].
20. Bloomfield JG, Jones A. Using e‑learning to support clinical
skills acquisition: Exploring the experiences and perceptions of
graduate first‑year pre‑registration nursing students‑a mixed
method study. Nurse Educ Today 2013;33:1605‑11.
21. Sitzmann T, Ely K, Bell BS, Bauer KN. The effects of technical
difficulties on learning and attrition during online training. J Exp
Psychol Appl 2010;16:281‑92.
22. Kim DJ, Lim CY, Gu N, Park CY. Visual Fatigue Induced by
Viewing a Tablet Computer with a High‑resolution Display.
Korean J Ophthalmol 2017;31:388‑93.
23. Bacro TR, Gebregziabher M, Ariail J. Lecture recording system
in anatomy: Possible benefit to auditory learners. Anat Sci Educ
2013;6:376‑84.
24. Rigamonti L, Dolci A, Galetta F, Stefanelli C, Hughes M,
Bartsch M, et al. Social media and e‑learning use among European
exercise science students. Health Promot Int 2020;35:470‑7.
25. Hepp SL, Tarraf RC, Birney A, Arain MA. Evaluation of the
awareness and effectiveness of IT security programs in a
large publicly funded health care system. Health Inf Manag
2018;47:116‑24..
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Volume 10, Issue 12
December 2020
Pages 1-5

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us