Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a growing global movement toward quality and safety in healthcare
and quality improvement (QI) in general surgery. The first step in any QI initiative is identifying the
challenges and barriers to achieve such goals and then to define appropriate actions. This study
aims to provide an overview of the QI challenges in Iranian hospitals’ surgery‑related processes and
suggest applied solutions accordingly.
METHODS: This is a sequential (qual‑quant) mixed‑method study from November 2019 to January
2020, involving 21 face‑to‑face interviews with hospital managers, quality officers, and surgery‑related
clinicians and staff, followed by a Delphi consensus‑seeking stage to finalize solutions. MAXQDA
software was applied for organizing the concepts, and thematic content analysis was used for
analyzing the data as an inductive approach to extract the emerging themes and sub‑themes.
RESULTS: The managerial problems were classified into four groups of (I) defects and delays in
completing patient medical records, (II) irregularity and the lack of transparency in the direction of
processes in the hospital, (III) inappropriate and unrealistic operating scheduling, and (IV) poor
safety considerations. The proposed solutions included imposing stricter regulations for competing
for medical records, such as reduction of payments, development of guiding brochures or protocols
for patients on their arrival, assigning a certain number of experienced nurses and surgeons for
schedule management, rewarding the report of medical and surgical error cases, and developing a
regular monitoring program for the proper implementation of surgical safety guidelines.
CONCLUSION: There are various managerial barriers that hamper QI in hospitals’ surgery‑related
processes. Implementing simple but agreed solutions can lead to saving patients’ lives, reduction of
the unnecessary use of resources, and enhance of patient and staff satisfaction.

Keywords

  1. Cantiello J, Kitsantas P, Moncada S, Abdul S. The evolution of
    quality improvement in healthcare: Patient‑centered care and
    health information technology applications. J Hosp Admin
    2016;5:62‑8.
    2. World Health Organization. Everybody’s Business Strengthening
    Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes: WHO’s Framework
    for Action. World Health Organization; 2007.
    3. Bickler SW, Spiegel D. Improving surgical care in low‑and
    middle‑income countries: A pivotal role for the World Health
    Organization. World J Surg 2010;34:386‑90.
    4. Dodwad SS. Quality management in healthcare. Indian J Public
    Health 2013;57:138‑43.
    5. Nicolay CR, Purkayastha S, Greenhalgh A, Benn J, Chaturvedi S,
    Phillips N, et al. Systematic review of the application of quality
    improvement methodologies from the manufacturing industry
    to surgical healthcare. Br J Surg 2012;99:324‑35.
    6. Powell AE, Rushmeer R, Davies H, NHS QISCO. A Systematic
    Narrative Review of Quality Improvement Models in Health Care:
    NHS Quality Improvement Scotland Edinburgh; 2009.
    7. van Driel ML, De Sutter AI, Christiaens TC, De Maeseneer JM.
    Quality of care: The need for medical, contextual and policy
    evidence in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract 2005;11:417‑29.
    8. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow SA. Defining quality of care.
    Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1611‑25.
    9. Information Canadian Institute for Health Information. National
    Health Expenditure Trends, 1975‑2003: Canadian Institute for
    Health Information; 2003.
    10. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH,
    Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce
    morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med
    2009;360:491‑9.
    11. Zoutman DE, Ford BD. Quality improvement in hospitals:
    Barriers and facilitators. Int J Health Care Qual Assur
    2017;30:16‑24.
    12. Endsley S, Coleman MT. Quality improvement: First steps. Fam
    Pract Manag 1999;6:23.
    13. Batalden PB. If improvement of the quality and value of health
    and health care is the goal, why focus on health professional
    development? J Nurs Care Qual 2001;15:17‑28.
    14. Davidoff F. Heterogeneity is not always noise: Lessons from
    improvement. JAMA 2009;302:2580‑6.
    15. Lomas J. Using research to inform healthcare managers’ and policy
    makers’ questions: From summative to interpretive synthesis.
    Healthc Policy 2005;1:55‑71.
    16. Kaplan HC, Brady PW, Dritz MC, Hooper DK, Linam WM,
    Froehle CM, et al. The influence of context on quality improvement
    success in health care: A systematic review of the literature.
    Milbank Q 2010;88:500‑59.
    17. Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM, Taylor SL, Dy SM, Foy R,
    et al. Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med
    2011;154:693‑6.
    18. Fletcher AJ. Applying critical realism in qualitative research:
    Methodology meets method. Int J Soc Res Methodol
    2017;20:181‑94.
    19. Morse JM, Richards L. Readme First for a User’s Guide to
    Qualitative Methods. United States, California, Sage Publications;
    2002.
    20. Lincoln YS. Organizational Theory and Inquiry: The Paradigm
    Revolution. United States, California, Sage Publications; 1985.
    21. Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P,
    Koroukian SM. Adherence to surgical care improvement project
    measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA
    2010;303:2479‑85.
    22. Ozgediz D, Jamison D, Cherian M, McQueen K. The burden
    of surgical conditions and access to surgical care in low‑and
    middle‑income countries. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:646‑7.
    23. Roach WH, Hoban RG, Broccolo BM, Roth AB, Blanchard TP.
    Medical Records and the Law. American Health Information
    Management Association (AHIMA) Jones & Bartlett Learning;
    2006.
    24. Kimiafar K, Vafaee Najar A, Sarbaz M. Quantitative
    investigation of inpatients’ medical records in training and
    social security hospitals in Mashhad. J Paramed Sci Rehabilit
    2015;4:58‑67.
    25. Balestra ML. Electronic health records: Patient care and ethical
    and legal implications for nurse practitioners. J Nurse Practit
    2017;13:105‑11.
    26. Parsaemehr S.Hospital Routing: Investigating factors affecting the
    routing process hospitals and design solutions. Environ Studies
    Haft Hesar 2015;12:37‑48.
    27. Tait AR, Voepel‑Lewis T, Munro HM, Gutstein HB, Reynolds PI.
    Cancellation of pediatric outpatient surgery: Economic and
    emotional implications for patients and their families. J Clin
    Anesth 1997;9:213‑9.
    28. Ivarsson B, Kimblad PO, Sjöberg T, Larsson S. Patient reactions
    to cancelled or postponed heart operations. J Nurs Manag
    2002;10:75‑81.
    29. Dadaş S, Eti‑aslan F. The causes and consequences of cancellations
    in planned orthopaedic surgery: The reactions of patients and
    their families. J Orthopaed Nurs 2004;8:11‑9.
    30. TabatabaeeSS, DehnaviehR, Noori HekmatS, Taghadoum KangiS,
    Sharifi T. Causes of surgery cancellation in Iran: A systematic
    review. J Health Develop 2016;5:175‑87.
    31. Kaddoum R, Fadlallah R, Hitti E, Fadi EJ, El Eid G. Causes
    of cancellations on the day of surgery at a Tertiary Teaching
    Hospital. BMC Health Servic Res 2016;16:259.
    32. Hovlid E, Bukve O, Haug K, Aslaksen AB, von Plessen C. A new
    pathway for elective surgery to reduce cancellation rates. BMC
    Health Services Res 2012;12:154.
    33. Hovlid E, Bukve O. A qualitative study of contextual factors’
    impact on measures to reduce surgery cancellations. BMC Health
    Services Res 2014;14:215.
    34. Mitchell L, Flin R, Yule S, Mitchell J, Coutts K,
    Youngson G. Evaluation of the scrub practitioners’ list of
    intraoperative non‑technical skills (SPLINTS) system. Int J
    Nurs Studies 2012;49:201‑11.
    35. Montaseri MA, Shadfar Z, Taghizadegan M, Surveying
    the degree of compliance with surgical safety principle,
    according to the World Health Organization Checklist in
    teaching hospitals of Jahrom in 2015. J Educ Ethics Nurs
    2015;6:14‑21.
  2. 36. Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Darzi A, Vincent CA.
    Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS):
    Refinement and application in urological surgery. World J Surg
    2007;31:1373‑81.
    37. Mitchell L, Flin R, Yule S, Mitchell J, Coutts K, Youngson G.
    Thinking ahead of the surgeon. An interview study to identify
    scrub nurses’ non‑technical skills. Int J Nurs Studies 2011;48:818‑28.
    38. Lin Y, Scott JW, Yi S, Taylor KK, Ntakiyiruta G, Ntirenganya F,
    et al. Improving surgical safety and nontechnical skills in
    variable‑resource contexts: A novel educational curriculum. J Surg
    Educ 2018;75:1014‑21.
    39. Baker DP, Salas E, King H, Battles J, Barach P. The role of
    teamwork in the professional education of physicians: Current
    status and assessment recommendations. Joint Commission J
    Quality Patient Safety 2005;31:185‑202.
    40. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human: Building
    a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press;
    2000.