Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Department of Psychology and Educational Science, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak,Iran
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Marital quality is an important predictor of marital continuity, which can lead to
mental health, well‑being, and happiness for couples, and marital quality is equivalent to marital
satisfaction and adjustment. This study was carried out to purpose the effectiveness of metacognition
therapy on marital quality of women in the city of Isfahan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research method was quasi‑experimental with a pretest–posttest
and control group design. The study population included all married women visiting consultation
centers in the city of Isfahan during March 2018–March 2019. The sampling method was nonrandom
voluntary sampling used to select 30 participants who were then randomly divided into experiment
and control groups (15 individuals each). The research tool was the Revised Dyadic Adjustment
Scale(RDAS). The experiment group participated in eight sessions of metacognition therapy, each
lasting 90 min. Covariance analysis method was used to analyze the data via SPSS21.
RESULTS: The result of covariance analysis showed that metacognition therapy has been effective
in improving the marital quality of the women in the city of Isfahan (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study emphasize that metacognition therapy is effective on the marital
quality of the women in the city of Isfahan. Using this treatment plan can result in improved marital quality
and marital satisfaction and therefore improve the relationship of couples. Therefore, the results of the
current study can provide empirical support for the use of metacognition therapy to improve marital quality.
Keywords
How Mind Fullness Training in One Partner Affects a
Relationship [PhD Thesis].United States: Alliant International
University; 2014.
2. Lawrence E, Barry RA, Brock RL, Bunde M, Langer A, Ro E,
et al. The relationship quality interview: Evidence of reliability,
convergent and divergent validity, and incremental utility.
Psychol Assess 2011;23:44‑63.
3. Fincham F, Beach S. Marriage in the new millennium: A decade
in review. J Marriage Fam 2010;72:30‑49.
4. Namani A, Shirdel M, Jahangiri AS. The effectiveness of teaching
metacognitive techniques on lifestyle. J North Khorasan Univ Med
Sci 2018;9:46-135.
5. Felavell J. Metacogrition and metacognitive monitorging: A new
area of cognitive‑ develop mental inquiry. Am Psychol 1979;34:11906.
6. Lajoie S, Lu J. Supporting collaboration with technology: Does
shared cognition lead to co‑regulation in medicine. Metacogn
Learn 2012;7:45‑62.
7. Wells A. Emotional Disorders and Metacognition. Translated by
Bahrami F. Isfahan: Mani Publications; 2006
8. Bahrami F, SamadiA. Comparing the Effectiveness of Mindfulness
and Meta‑Cognitive Family Therapy Approaches on the Quality
of Marital Relationships in Divorce Clients [Master Thesis]. Iran,
Isfahan: Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of
Esfahan; 2008.
9. Busby D, Christensen C, Crane D, Larson J. A revision of the
dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed
couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales.
J Marital Fam Ther 1995;21:289‑308.
10. Hollist C, Miller R. Perceptions of attachment style and marital
quality in midlife marriage. Fam Relat 2005;54:46‑57.
11. Spanier G. The measurement of marital quality. J Sex Marital Ther
1979;3:3-230.
12. Bradbury N, Fincham F. Research of the nature and determinates
of marital satisfaction: A saccade in review. J Marriage Fam
2000;55:230‑3.
13. Isanezhad O, Ahmadi SA, Bahrami F, Baghban‑Cichani I,
Farajzadegan Z, Etemadi O. Factor structure and reliability of the
Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) in Iranian population.
Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci 2012;6:55‑61.
14. Ashory J, Khalegh F, Safariyan M. The effect of metacognitive
therapy on marital satisfaction of women. J Women Fam Stud
2015;6:53‑65.
15. Olia N, Fatehi zadeh M, Bahrami F. Enrichment of Marital Life.
1st ed. Tehran: Publishers Danjheh; 2010.
16. Barzegar A, Samani S. The mediating role of intimacy in the
relationship between communication patterns and marital quality
of life. Q J Woman Soc 2017;7:28-115.
17. Khanjani Vashaki S, Shafiabadi A, Fatehizadeh M. Comparison
of the effectiveness of cognitive‑behavioral coupling therapy
and acceptance and commitment therapy based on marital
quality of conflicting couples in Isfahan. J Behav Sci Res
2016;14:71-464.
)