Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Antai College of Economics and Management/School of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

2 Research Center of Health and Environment, Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

3 Ph.D. Student, Biostatistics, Student Research Committee, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 Ph.D. Student, Health Education and Health Promotion, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The need assessment is a fundamental part of any planning, and almost by
neglecting it, the effectiveness of the programs is impossible. The purpose of this study was the
prioritization of needs among students of the Iran University of Medical Sciences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The design study was conducted in two parts; in the first part, the
design of the questionnaire was done by qualitative methods. The questionnaires were extracted
by interviewing and obtained acceptable validity and reliability. Moreover, the second part created
a questionnaire consisting of four categories: education, welfare, economic, and psychological and
social. A simple random sampling method was used to select 363 people using the Cochran formula.
Finally, 336 people (including 28 people excluded) completed the questionnaire. A questionnaire
designed to collect sample data was used and analyzed using version 23 of SPSS.
RESULTS: A total of 336 students (26.77 ± 5.45 years) participated in the study. 123 (36.6%) were
male and 213 (63.4%) were female. Psychological and social needs of students were prioritized,
and educational priorities were ranked second. The findings showed that there was no significant
statistical difference between the scores of welfares and psychosocial and educational needs and
the gender of the research units (P > 0.05). However, in the mean of economic needs scores, there
is a significant statistical difference between the marital status of the research units (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The results of our study in the research units showed that the priority of psychosocial
needs was more than other needs and the educational priority was the next. According to the results
of this study, we suggest that, in future educational and educational planning, policymakers and
planners should pay attention to psychological and social issues.

Keywords

1. FontanaR, GeunaA, MattM. Factor’s affecting university–Industry
R and D projects: The importance of searching, screening and
signalling. Res Policy 2006;35:309‑23.
2. Lee M. What makes a difference between two schools? Teacher job
satisfaction and educational outcomes. Int Educ J 2006;7:642‑50.
3. Knight J. Coaching to improve teaching: Using the instructional
coaching model. In: Coaching in Education. London: Routledge;
2018. p. 93‑113.
4. Gibbens B. Measuring student motivation in an introductory
biology class. Am Biol Teach 2019;81:20‑6.
5. Holmes N. Engaging with assessment: Increasing student
engagement through continuous assessment. Act Learn Higher
Educ 2018;19:23‑34.
6. Bailey D. The contribution of work‑based supervision to
interprofessional learning on a Master’s programme in
community mental health. J Interprof Care 2004;5:263‑78.
7. Wiers‑Jenssen J, Stensaker BR, Gr‑Gaard JB. Student satisfaction:
Towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept. Q Higher
Educ 2002;8:183‑95.
8. Shafaei‑Khanghah Y, Enteshari‑Moghaddam A, Amani F,
Ghobadi H, Farzaneh E. Educational needs assessment of
faculty members in Ardabil University of medical sciences. Int J
Community Med Public Health 2017;4:4042‑8.
9. Livingstone N, Naismith N. Faculty and undergraduate student
perceptions of an integrated mentoring approach. Act Learn
Higher Educ 2018;19:77‑92.
10. Khoshbaten M, Ghaffari R, Salek F, Amini A, Hassanzadeh S,
Gholanbar P. Educational needs assessment of faculty members
of Tabriz University of medical sciences, Tabriz Iran. Res Dev
Med Educ 2014;3:15‑23.
11. Baker A. What else do students need? A psychodynamic reflection
on students’ need for support from staff at university. Act Learn
Higher Educ 2006;7:171‑83.
12. Geertshuis SA. Slaves to our emotions: Examining the predictive
relationship between emotional well‑being and academic
outcomes. Act Learn Higher Educ 2019; 20 (2): 153‑66.
13. Wass R, Timmermans J, Harland T, McLean A. Annoyance and
frustration: Emotional responses to being assessed in higher
education. Act Learn Higher Educ2018;1 (1):10‑11
14. Turki FJ, Jdaitawi M, Sheta H. Fostering positive adjustment
behaviour: Social connectedness, achievement motivation and
emotional‑social learning among male and female university
students. Act Learn Higher Educ 2018;19:145‑58.
15. Moradi E, Didehban H. Faculty members development in medical
education: Programs, interventions and outcomes. J Urmia Nurs
Midwifery Fac 2017;15:10‑8.
16. KhashabiE, Esmaeili MoghaddamM, BehrouzP, MirzaeeZ, MoradiE.
Evaluation of patients satisfaction with diseases of periodontics of
teaching methods at the dental clinic and determination of the effects
of age and sex on their learning. Urmia Med J 2017;28:111.
17. Monette ML. The concept of educational need: An analysis of
selected literature. Adult Educ 1977;27:116‑27.
18. Scissons EH. Needs assessment in adult education (Brackhaus,
1984): A reaction. Adult Educ Q 1984;35:105‑8.
19. Brackhaus B. Needs assessment in adult education: Its problems
and prospects. Adult Educ Q 1984;34:233‑9.
20. Pennington FC. Needs assessment: Concepts, models, and
characteristics. New Dir Adult Contin Educ 1980;1980:1‑14.
21. Posavac EJ. Program Evaluation: Methods and Case Studies.
Chicago: Routledge; 2015.
22. Kasser T, Ahuvia A. Materialistic values and well‑being in
business students. Eur J Soc Psychol 2002;32:137‑46.
23. Grant J. Learning needs assessment: Assessing the need. BMJ
2002;324:156‑9.
24. Simpson‑Beck V. Assessing classroom assessment techniques.
Act Learn Higher Educ 2011;12:125‑32.
25. McDonald B. Improving learning through Meta assessment. Act
Learn Higher Educ 2010;11:119‑29.
26. Van Scoy LJ, Green MJ, Volpe R. Evaluating an advance care
planning curriculum: A lecture, a game, a patient, and an essay.
Med Sci Educ 2019;29: 453–462.
27. Evans DJ, Zeun P, Stanier RA. Motivating student learning using
a formative assessment journey. J Anat 2014;224:296‑303.
28. Pereira MM, Artemiou E, McGonigle D, Köster L, Conan A,
Sithole F. Second Life and classroom environments: Comparing
small group teaching and learning in developing clinical reasoning process skills. Med Sci Educ 2019;29: 431–437
29. Gipps C. Beyond Testing (Classic Edition): Towards a Theory
of Educational Assessment. london AND new york: Routledge;
2011.
30. Lacerenza CN, Marlow SL, Tannenbaum SI, Salas E. Team
development interventions: Evidence‑based approaches for
improving teamwork. Am Psychol 2018;73:517‑31.
31. Eldredge LK, Markham CM, Ruiter RA, Kok G, Fernandez ME,
Parcel GS. Planning Health Promotion Programs: An
Intervention Mapping Approach. United States: John Wiley and
Sons; 2016.
32. Rust C. The impact of assessment on student learning: How can
the research literature practically help to inform the development
of departmental assessment strategies and learner‑centred
assessment practices? Act Learn Higher Educ 2002;3:145‑58.
33. Tones K. Empowerment and the promotion of health. JInst Health
Educ 1992;30:133‑7.
34. Houseknecht VE, Roman B, Stolfi A, Borges NJ. A longitudinal
assessment of professional identity, wellness, imposter
phenomenon, and calling to medicine among medical students.
Med Sci Educ 2019; 29 (6):1‑5.
35. ShilanA, KasmaeiP, FarmanbarR, ShakibaM, MahdaviroushanM,
Zareban I, et al. Factors predicting nutritional behaviors related
to gastric cancer: A model‑guided study. Drug Invent Today
2018;10:936‑41.
36. Schmoker M. Focus: Elevating the Essentials to Radically Improve
Student Learning. Virginia: ASCD; 2018.
37. Anderson MC, Love LM, Haggar FL. Looking beyond the
physician educator: The evolving roles of instructional designers
in medical education. Med Sci Edu 2019;29 (2) 507–513.
38. Ashrafi E, Kasmaei P, Mehrabian F, Omidi S, Zareban I,
Haryalchi K. Predictive factors of behavioral intention in
aids prevention in nursing and midwifery students at Guilan
University of medical sciences. Drug Invent Today 2019;12:239‑42.
39. Lee RL, Loke AJ. Health‑promoting behaviors and psychosocial
well‑being of university students in Hong Kong. Public Health
Nurs 2005;22:209‑20.
40. Kavousi E, KhazaeiZ, Amini A, Fattahi E, Pnahi A, Sohrabivafa M,
et al. Promoting behaviors of healthiness in two domains of
physical activity and nutrition statue in high school students. Int
J Pediatr 2017;5:4839‑47.
41. Koster M, Pijl SJ, Nakken H, Van Houten E. Social participation
of students with special needs in regular primary education in
the Netherlands. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2010;57:59‑75.
42. Myyry L, Helkama K. University students’ value priorities and
emotional empathy. Educ Psychol 2001;21:25‑40.
43. Shek DT, Lee TY. Helping adolescents with greater psychosocial
needs: Subjective outcome evaluation based on different cohorts.
ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012:694018.
44. Yang Y, Zhang Y, Sheldon KM. Self‑determined motivation
for studying abroad predicts lower culture shock and greater
well‑being among international students: The mediating role
of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Int J Intercult Relat
2018;63:95‑104.
45. Agron P, Berends V, Ellis K, Gonzalez M. School wellness policies:
Perceptions, barriers, and needs among school leaders and
wellness advocates. J Sch Health 2010;80:527‑35.
46. Farrer L, Gulliver A, Chan JK, Bennett K, Griffiths KM. A virtual
mental health clinic for university students: A qualitative study of
end‑user service needs and priorities. JMIR Ment Health 2015;2:e2.