Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Educational Development office of Medical School, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the last few centuries, the overspecialization of various sciences under the
pretext of benefiting from pure disciplinary knowledge led to alienation among and competition
between different fields of science. Such competition has deviated knowledge from its main objective
which is to understand and explain the phenomena. The remedy to this dilemma is to address a new
approach, introduced to higher education in the late 1950s as “interdisciplinarity.” Accordingly, the
main purpose of this article is to propose the strategic instances of operationalizing interdisciplinarity
as the key requirements to provide a guideline for designing interdisciplinarity activities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present survey was carried out through the framework synthesis
method. To codify the instances of operationalizing interdisciplinarity, the main elements and structures
of the model were set as the basis of the query for each element and structure; an independent
query was carried out in the literature of the study. The correspondence of the discovered instances
was once more compared with the conceptual boxes of the primary theoretical model. Ultimately,
the taxonomy was concluded through the operational instances based on the primary framework.
RESULTS: A total of 152 strategies were identified as implications of operationalization of 13 layers
and 38 sublayers of the multilayer interdisciplinary model.
CONCLUSION: The development of interdisciplinarity in the national higher education system requires
several measures to be taken at different levels of a discipline or scientific field of study. Relying on
this, which is the main basis of entering into interdisciplinarity activities, the present study suggests
and presents strategic instances of interdisciplinarity operationalization.
Keywords
- Frodeman R. Sustainable Knowledge: A Theory of
Interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Macmillan: Springer; 2013.
2. Bammer G. Disciplining Interdisciplinarity: Integration and
Implementation Sciences for Researching Complex Real‑World
Problems. Published by ANU E Press The Australian National
University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia: ANU Press; 2013.
3. Razzaq J, Townsend T, Pisapia J. Towards an understanding
of interdisciplinarity: The case of a British University. Issues
Interdiscip Stud 2013;31:149‑73.
4. Morin E. Sur l’interdisciplinarité. Bulletin interactif du Centre
international de recherches et études transdisciplinaires. 1994;2.
5. Yazdani S, Hajiahmadi M, Shakerian S. Rethinking
interdisciplinarity: Proposing a multilayered model. Medical
Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2020;34:118.
6. Klein JT. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit,
MI: Wayne State University Press; 1990.
7. Klein JT. Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures: AModel for
Strength and Sustainability. 1807, New York, New York, United
States John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
8. Yazdani S, Hajiahmadi M, Shakerian S. Interdisciplinarity; Out
of Semantic Confusion in Iran. Journal of Medical Education.
2019;18:1-5.
9. Yazdani S, Hajiahmadi M, Shakerian S. Rethinking
interdisciplinarity: Proposing a multilayered model. Med J Islamic
Repub Iran 2020;34:802‑10.
10. Booth A, Carroll C. How to build up the actionable knowledge
base: The role of ‘best fit’framework synthesis for studies of
improvement in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:700‑8.
11. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1427 E. 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637 USA University of Chicago Press; 2012.
12. Garcia, A., 2019. Transdisciplinarity from Marginal Spaces:
Unsettling Epistemic Erasure of Critical and Decolonial Scholars
(Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado Boulder).
13. Rosenberger RS. An Integrative Hierarchical Framework for
Environmental Valuation: Value Pluralism, Thresholds, and
Deliberation. Regional Research Institute and Division of
Resource Management West Virginia University Research Paper;
2001. p. 14.
14. Rousseau D, Wilby J, Billingham J, Blachfellner S. A typology for
the systems field. Systema Connecting Matter Life , culture, and
technology 2016;4:15‑47.
15. Schmidt JC. Towards a philosophy of interdisciplinarity. Poiesis
Prax 2008;5:53‑69.
16. Balsamo A, Mitcham C. Interdisciplinarity in Ethics and the Ethics
of Interdisciplinarity. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2010.
p. 259‑72.
17. Dressel PL, Marcus D. On Teaching and Learning in College.
Reemphasizing the Roles of Learners and the Disciplines. The
Jossey‑Base Series in Higher Education. Jossey‑Bass Inc., 433
California St., San Francisco, CA 94104 ERIC; 1982.
18. Krishnan A. What Are Academic Disciplines? Some Observations
on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity Debate; 2009. ESRC
National Centre for Research Methods NCRM Working Paper
Series.
19. Little E, editor. A Proposed Methodology for the Development of
Application‑Based Formal Ontologies. KI Workshop on Reference
Ontologies and Application Ontologies; 2003.
20. Schnieder L, Wegener M. Transgression of semantic boundaries by
methodical terminology management. InLeicester: International
Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment 2010 (Vol. 9).
21. Vosskamp W, Miller RC, Klein JT. From scientific specialization
to the dialogue between the disciplines. Issues Interdiscip Stud
1986.
22. GabbayDM, ThagardP, Woods J, KuipersTA. General Philosophy
of Science: Focal Issues. North‑Holland Elsevier; 2007.
23. Fuchsman, K. “Rethinking integration in interdisciplinary
studies.” Issues in Integrative Studies 2009;27:70‑85.
24. Gruskin S, Daniels N. Process is the point: Justice and human
rights: Priority setting and fair deliberative process. Am J Public
Health 2008;98:1573‑7.
25. McCallin AM. Pluralistic dialogue: A grounded theory of
interdisciplinary practice. Aust J Rehabil Couns 1999;5:78‑85.
26. Lynch J. It’s Not Easy Being Interdisciplinary. 1586, Oxford,
United Kingdom Oxford University Press; 2006.
27. Miller ML. 2005. Integrative concepts and interdisciplinary
work: A study of faculty thinking in four college and university
programs (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of
Education).
28. Prager K, Morris S, Currie M, Macleod K. Exploring
Interdisciplinarity: Summary Report of the ‘Developing an
Interdisciplinary Culture of Excellence (DICE)’ Project at the
James Hutton Institute. Scotland, UK: The James Hutton Institute;
2015.
29. Stein Z. Modeling the demands of interdisciplinarity: Toward a
framework for evaluating interdisciplinary endeavors. Integr Rev
2007;4:91‑107.
30. Szostak R. Extensional Definition of Interdisciplinarity. Issues in
Interdisciplinary Studies. 2015;33:94‑116.
31. Max‑Neef MA. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecol Economic
2005;53:5‑16.
32. Overton WF, Müller U. Metatheories, theories, and concepts in
the study of development. In: Handbook of Psychology. 2nd ed.
1807, New York, New York, United States John Wiley & Sons
2012. p. 6.
33. Sawa RJ. Foundations of interdisciplinarity: A lonergan
perspective. Med Health Care Philos 2005;8:53‑61.
34. Whitley R. Umbrella and polytheistic scientific disciplines and
their elites. Soc Stud Sci 1976;6:471‑97.
35. Carp R. Relying on the kindness of strangers: CEDD’s report on
hiring, tenure, promotion in IDS. Assoc Integr Stud Newslett
2008;30:1‑7.
36. GoldingC. Integrating the Disciplines: Successful Interdisciplinary.
Centre for the Study of Higher Education. The University of
Melbourne; 2009.
37. vom Brocke J, Lippe S. Managing collaborative research projects:
A synthesis of project management literature and directives for
future research. Int J Project Manag 2015;33:1022‑39.
38. Palmer MA, Kramer JG, Boyd J, Hawthorne D. Practices for
facilitating interdisciplinary synthetic research: The National
Socio‑Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC). Curr Opin
Environ Sustain 2016;19:111‑22.
39. Stevenson CB, Duran RL, Barrett KA, Colarulli GC. Fostering
faculty collaboration in learning communities: A developmental
approach. Innov Higher Educ 2005;30:23‑36.
40. HaythornthwaiteC, LunsfordKJ, BowkerGC, BruceBC. Challenges
for Research and Practice in Distributed, Interdisciplinary
Collaboration. New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production:
Understanding E‑Science. Pennsylvania, United States IGI Global;
2006. p. 143‑66.
41. Bililign S, Schimmel K, Roop JP, Meyerson G. A university
without departments and colleges‑A new structure to strengthen
disciplinary and interdisciplinary education and research. Int J
Innov Educ Res 2015;3.
42. Bingham NE, Doty WG, Klein JT. Integrating Interdisciplinary
Organizations: A Preliminary Directory For Networking. Issues
in Interdisciplinary Studies; 1990.
43. Klein JT. Finding interdisciplinary knowledge and information.
New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1994;58:7‑33.
44. Mazaheri E, Geraei E, Zare‑Farashbandi F, Papi A. The condition
of interdisciplinary communication among various Educational
and Research Departments of Isfahan University of Medical
Sciences. J Educ Health Promot 2017;6:46.
45. Desmarais L, Parent R, Leclerc L, Raymond L, MacKinnon S,
Vézina N. Knowledge transfer between two geographically
distant action research teams. J Workplace Learn
2009;21:219‑39.
46. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: From
National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–
industry–government relations. Res Policy 2000;29:109‑23.
47. Harden R. AMEE guide No. 12: Multiprofessional education:
Part 1‑effective multiprofessional education: A three‑dimensional
perspective. Med Teacher 1998;20:402‑8.
48. Hyun E. Transdisciplinary higher education curriculum:
A complicated cultural artifact. Res Higher Educ J 2011;11:1.
49. Ivanitskaya L, Clark D, Montgomery G, Primeau R.
Interdisciplinary learning: Process and outcomes. Innov High
Educ 2002;27:95‑111.
50. Johnson AG. “Deep Interdisciplinarity” as Critical Pedagogy:
Teaching at the intersections of urban communication and public
place and space. Int J Crit Pedagogy 2014;5:p5‑23. 19p.
51. Klein JT. Integrative learning and interdisciplinary studies. Peer
Rev 2005;7:8‑10.
52. Modo M, Kinchin I. A conceptual framework for interdisciplinary
curriculum design: A case study in neuroscience. J Undergrad
Neurosci Educ 2011;10:A71.
53. Chrysanthou A, Nottingham E. Conferences as a Tool for
Interdisciplinary (Postgraduate) Learning in Bioethics. Jahr:
Europski časopis za bioetiku. 2018;9:234‑46.
54. Barry A, Born G, Weszkalnys G. Logics of interdisciplinarity.
Econ Soc 2008;37:20‑49.
55. Blackwell A, Wilson L, Boulton C, Knell J. Creating value across
boundaries. Nesta Rep 2010. NESTA Research Report CVAB/48.
56. Linde C. Narrative and social tacit knowledge. J Knowl Manage
2001;5:160‑71.
57. Gray B. Enhancing transdisciplinary research through
collaborative leadership. Am J Prevent Med 2008;35:S124‑32.
58. Holley KA. Understanding Interdisciplinary Challenges and
Opportunities in Higher Education. Jossey‑Bass; 2009 San
Francisco, California, United States.
59. BhaskarR. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique
of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Routledge; 2014. Milton
Park, Abingdon‑on‑Thames, Oxford shire, England, UK.
60. Pourkarim M, Ghamsari AS, Noeparast KB, Mehrmohammadi M.
The explanation of the bhaskar’s critical realism ontological
assumptions and their applications on interdisciplinary research.
Interdiscip Stud Humanit 2014;6:131‑7.
61. Nicolini D, Mengis J, Swan J. Understanding the role of objects
in cross‑disciplinary collaboration. Organ Sci 2012;23:612‑29.
62. Graham J, Haidt J, Koleva S, Motyl M, Iyer R, Wojcik SP, Ditto
PH. Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral
pluralism. InAdvances in experimental social psychology 2013
Jan 1 (Vol. 47, pp. 55-130). Academic Press.
63. Little D. Beyond positivism: Toward a methodological pluralism
for the social sciences. www‑personal. umd. umich. edu/~
delittle/BEYPOSIT. PDF. 2004;10.
64. Noy NF. Semantic integration: A survey of ontology‑based
approaches. ACM Sigmod Record 2004;33:65‑70.
65. Mansilla V B . I n t e r d i s c i p l i n a r y L e a r n i n g :
A Cognitive‑Epistemological Foundation. Oxford, UK: Oxford
Handbook for Interdisciplinary; 2016.
66. Crebert G, Patrick CJ, Cragnolini V, Smith C, Worsfold K, Webb F.
Griffith graduate attributes teamwork skills toolkit. Griffith
Graduate Attributes Teamwork Skills Toolkit. 2011.
67. Chrysanthou A, Nottingham E. Conferences as a Tool for
Interdisciplinary (Postgraduate) Learning in Bioethics. Jahr:
Europski časopis za bioetiku. 2018 Dec 19;9(2):234‑46.
)