BACKGROUND: Nowadays, the use of Internet with e‑learning resources anytime and anywhere leads to interaction possibilities among teachers and students from different parts of the world. It is becoming increasingly pertinent that we exploit the Internet technologies to achieve the most benefits in the education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compares the difference between traditional classroom and e‑learning in the educational environment. Medical undergraduate students of our institution were enrolled to compare between the online versus traditional method of teaching through questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty percent of students found the online lecture material difficult to understand. 42.6% of respondents found it difficult to clear the doubts in online teaching; 64.4% of the participants believed that they have learned more in a face‑to‑face learning. CONCLUSION: In this study, we concluded that online mode offers flexibility on timing and delivery. Students can even download the content, notes, and assignment. Despite all the advantages offered, there is a general consensus that no technology can replace face‑to‑face teaching in real because in this, there will be visual as well as verbal discussion. Looking at the uncertainty of the current scenario, it is difficult to predict how long online classes will have to continue. Hence, it is of paramount importance that we assess the effectiveness of online classes and consequently take measures to ensure proper delivery of content to students, especially in a skilled field like medicine, so we concluded that face‑to‑face learning is of utmost importance in medical institutions.
1. Fei LI, Jingyao QI, Wang G, Wang X. Traditional classroom Vs E‑learning in higher education: Difference between Students’ Behavioural Engagement. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 2014;9:48‑51. 2. Allen IE, Seaman J. Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group; 2013. Available from: http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/ reports/changingcourse.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 01]. 3. Alsaaty FM, Carter E, Abrahams D, Alshameri F. Traditional versus online learning in institutions of higher education: Minority business students’ perceptions. Business and Management Research 2016;5:31‑41. Available from: http:// www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/ download/9597/5817. [Last accessed on 1st March 2021] 4. Thomas HF, Simmons RJ, Jin G, Almeda AA, Mannos AA. Comparison of student outcomes for a classroom‑based vs. an internet‑based construction safety course. J SH E Res 2005;2:1‑5. 5. Chen NS, Kinshuk K, Wang YH. Cyber schooling framework: Improving mobility and situated learning. Int J Eng Educ 2007;23:421‑33.
Sanjana Kumari,.. , Hitender Gautam,.. , Neha Nityadarshini,.. , Bimal Kumar Das,.. and Rama Chaudhry,.. (2021). Online classes versus traditional classes? Comparison during COVID‑19. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11(11), 1-4.
MLA
Sanjana Kumari,.. , , Hitender Gautam,.. , , Neha Nityadarshini,.. , , Bimal Kumar Das,.. , and Rama Chaudhry,.. . "Online classes versus traditional classes? Comparison during COVID‑19", Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11, 11, 2021, 1-4.
HARVARD
Sanjana Kumari .., Hitender Gautam .., Neha Nityadarshini .., Bimal Kumar Das .., Rama Chaudhry .. (2021). 'Online classes versus traditional classes? Comparison during COVID‑19', Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11(11), pp. 1-4.
CHICAGO
.. Sanjana Kumari, .. Hitender Gautam, .. Neha Nityadarshini, .. Bimal Kumar Das and .. Rama Chaudhry, "Online classes versus traditional classes? Comparison during COVID‑19," Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11 11 (2021): 1-4,
VANCOUVER
Sanjana Kumari .., Hitender Gautam .., Neha Nityadarshini .., Bimal Kumar Das .., Rama Chaudhry .. Online classes versus traditional classes? Comparison during COVID‑19. J Educ Health Promot, 2021; 11(11): 1-4.