Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timely and appropriate follow‑up appointments for infants at risk for retinopathy of
prematurity (ROP) are very important to prevent blindness. Caregivers are important members of the
ROP team, and their involvement is essential in ensuring optimal visual outcomes. This paper aimed
to develop health information materials on ROP by a systematic process for better comprehensibility
by the target audience of low literacy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a methodological study conducted at the neonatal intensive care
unit of a tertiary care hospital, North India. The development and validation of educational materials
was conducted in six steps. The study focused on both the knowledge of the target audience and
on the validation of the educational materials by experts and caregivers of ROP eligible infants.
RESULTS: Most of the items (content, language, layout, motivation, and cultural appropriateness)
were in either a suitable or adequate category. Only one item illustration was in the nonsuitable
category. The mean final score of the leaflet after revision by experts was 9 (maximum score = 10).
Regarding readability, The Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch‑Kincaid Grade Level, and gunning
fog index were found to be 72.5, 7.4, and 6.2, respectively. The leaflet was found to be suitable for
the seventh grader. The mean knowledge score of the parents was 4 (maximum score‑5).
CONCLUSION: The study showed satisfactory acceptance of the developed ROP information
materials by caregivers and experts. A similar approach could be adopted for the development of
other health information materials.

Keywords

1. Kong L, Fry M, Al‑Samarraie M, Gilbert C, Steinkuller PG. An
update on progress and the changing epidemiology of causes of
childhood blindness worldwide. J AAPOS 2012;16:501‑7.
2.     Amer M, Jafri WH, Nizami AM, Shomrani AI, Al‑Dabaan AA,
Rashid K. Retinopathy of prematurity: Are we missing any infant
with retinopathy of prematurity? BrJ Ophthalmol 2012;96:1052‑5.
3.     Chattopadhyay MP, Pradhan A, Singh R, Datta S. Incidence and
risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity in neonates. Indian
Pediatr 2015;52:157‑8.
4.     Vinekar A, Dogra M, Azad RV, Gilbert C, Gopal L, Trese M. The
changing scenario of retinopathy of prematurity in middle and
low income countries: Unique solutions for unique problems.
Indian J Ophthalmol 2019;67:717‑9.
5. Ho LY, Faia LJ, Trese MT. Safety net for ROP management. Exp
Rev Ophthalmol 2010;5:327‑31.
6.     Vinekar A, Jayadev C, Dogra M, Shetty B. Improving follow‑up
of infants during retinopathy of prematurity screening in rural
areas. Ind Paed 2016;53:S151‑4.
7. Mousavi SZ, Karkhaneh R, Roohipoor R, Ahmadabadi MN,
Ghalichi L, Ghassemi F, et al. Screening for retinopathy of
prematurity: The role of educating the parents. Iran J Ophthalmol
2010;22:13‑8.
8.     Oshagh M, Danoei MS, Ghahremoni Y, Pojuhi N, Boushehri SG.
Impact of an educational leaflet on parents’ knowledge and
awareness of children’s orthodontic problems in Shiraz. EMHJ
2011;17:121‑5.
9.     Eschaliera B, Descampsb S, Boisgard S, Pereirad B,
Lefevre‑Colaue MM, Clausg D,et al. Validation of an educational
booklet targeted to patients candidate for total knee arthroplasty.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013;99:313‑9.
10.     Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram. Ministry of Health & Family
Welfare. Government of India. Guidelines for Universal Eye
Screening in Newborns Including Retinopathy of Prematurity;
2017. Available from: https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/
programmes/RBSK/Resource_Documents/Revised_ROP_
Guidelines‑Web_Optimized.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 12].
11.     Centers for Disease Control and PreventionWeb site. Scientific and
TechnicalInformationSimplyPut.Available from:http://www.cdc.
gov/DHDSP/cdcynergy_training/Content/activeinformation/
resources/simpput.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Dec 01].
12.     AlKhalili R, Shukla PA, Patel RH, Sanghvi S, Hubbi B. Readability
assessment of internet‑based patient education materials related
to mammography for breast cancer screening. Acad Radiol
2015;22:290‑5.
13.     Readability Formulas. Available from: Available from: http://
www.readabilityformulas.com/. [Last accessed on 2018 Sep 13].
14. Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Internet‑derived information on
cleft lip and palate for families with affected children. Cleft Palate
Craniofac J 2009;46:75‑80.
15.     Doak CC, Doak L, Root JH. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy
Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1996.
Available form: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/healthliteracy/
resources/teaching‑patients‑with‑low‑literacy‑skills/. [Last
accessed on 2019 Aug 20].
16. Rhee RL, Von Feldt JM, Schumacher HR, Merkel PA. Readability
and suitability assessment of patient education materials in
rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013;65:1702‑6.
17.     Sustersic M, Gauchet A, Foote A, Bosson JL. How best to use
and evaluate Patient Information Leaflets given during a
consultation: A systematic review of literature reviews. Health
Expect 2017;20:531‑42.
18.     Khurana S, Rao BK, Lewis LE, Bhat R, Purkayastha J, Kamath A,
et al. Development and validation of educational leaflet for
caregivers of preterm infants. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:YC01‑4.
19. Piddennavar R, Krishnappa P. Preparation and evaluation of
informationleafletfortobaccousers.JEducHealthPromot 2015;4:19.
20. Sweller J, van Merrienboer JJ, Paas FG. Cognitive architecture
and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 1998;10:251‑96.
21.     Zakaria R, Sutan R, Jaafar R. Developing and implementing a
health educational package for preemie moms in the care of their
baby after hospital discharge. J Educ Health Promot 2020;9:113.
22. Raj S, Sharma VL, Singh AJ, Goel S. Evaluation of quality and
readability of health information websites identified through
India’s major search engines. Adv Prev Med 2016;2016:4815285.
23. Williams AM, Muir KW, Rosdahl JA. Readability of patient
education materials in ophthalmology: A single‑institution study
and systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol 2016;16:133.
24. Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R. Readability of
patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen
Intern Med 2012;27:1165‑70.
25. Coulter A. Evidence-based patient information is important, so
there needs to be anational strategy to ensure it.BMJ 1998;317:225‑6.
26.     M o r a n MB, Frank LB, Chatterjee JS, Murphy ST,
Baezconde‑Garbanati L. A pilot test of the acceptability and
efficacy of narrative and nonnarrative health education materials
in a low health literacy population.J Commun Healthc 2016;9:40‑8.
27.     Hartling L, Scott S, Pandya R, Johnson D, Bishop T, Klassen TP.
Storytelling as a communication tool for health consumers:
Development of an intervention for parents of children with croup.
Stories to communicatehealthinformation.BMCPediatr 2010;10:64.