Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 1 Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Psychiatric Nursing and Management, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Labbafinezhad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) is one of the effective factors in promoting the health of diabetic
patients. In recent years, the role of peer support in the optimal management of diabetes has gained
increasing attention. However, contradictory results have been reported from the effectiveness of
this method. This study aimed to investigate the effect of peer support on the QOL among type 2
diabetic patients in deprived areas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized clinical trial conducted on 80 patients
with T2D referring to the diabetes Clinic in Aligoudarz in Iran. Participants were randomly assigned
into two groups of 40 patients. Intervention group received a peer Supportive‑educational program
for 3 months and the control group received routine clinic care. Diabetes QOL brief clinical inventory
was used to collect the data. This questionnaire was completed three times at the beginning of the
study, immediately after the 3‑day training, and after 3 months of peer supportive intervention. The
SPSS software (v. 18.0) was used to analyze the data through the Generalized Estimating Equations.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean QOL between the two groups before the
intervention (P = 0.891) and immediately after the education (P = 0.076). However, after 3 months
of intervention, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in mean QOL compared to
those in the control group (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Peer support program can improve the QOL in type 2 diabetic patients in deprived
areas. Therefore, this method can be recommended to improve care and educational programs in
these patients.
Keywords
- International Diabetes Federation.IDF Diabetes Atlas,
9th edn. Brussels,Belgium: 2019. Online version Available
from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org. [Last accessed on 2020
Feb 10].
2. Javanbakht M, Mashayekhi A, Baradaran HR, Haghdoost A,
Afshin A. Projection of diabetes population size and associated
economic burden through 2030 in Iran: Evidence from
micro‑simulation Markov model and Bayesian meta‑analysis.
PLoS One 2015;10:e0132505.
3. Jafarian‑Amirkhizi A, Sarayani A, Gholami K ,
Taghizadeh‑Ghehi M, Heidari K, Jafarzadeh‑Kohneloo A, et al.
Adherence to medications, self‑care activity, and HbA1c status
among patients with type 2 diabetes living in an urban area of
Iran. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2018;17:165‑72.
4. Tol A, Pourreza A, Shojaeezadeh D, Mahmoodi M, Mohebbi B.
The assessment of relations between socioeconomic status and
number of complications among type 2 diabetic patients. Iran J
Public Health 2012;41:66‑72.
5. Mokhtari Z, Gheshlagh RG, Kurdi A. Health‑related quality
of life in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes: An updated
meta‑analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2019;13:402‑7.
6. Jing X, Chen J, Dong Y, Han D, Zhao H, Wang X, et al. Related
factors of quality of life of type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic
review and meta‑analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018;16:189.
7. Chung JO, Cho DH, Chung DJ, Chung MY. Assessment of factors
associated with the quality of life in Korean type 2 diabetic
patients. Intern Med 2013;52:179‑85.
8. Mirfeizi M, Jafarabadi MA, Toorzani ZM, Mohammadi SM,
Azad MD, Mohammadi AV, et al. Feasibility, reliability and
validity of the Iranian version of the diabetes quality of life
brief clinical inventory (IDQOL‑BCI). Diabetes Res Clin Pract
2012;96:237‑47.
9. Mohebi S, Parham M, Sharifirad G, Gharlipour Z,
Mohammadbeigi A, Rajati F. Relationship between perceived
social support and self‑care behavior in type 2 diabetics:
A cross‑sectional study. J Educ Health Promot 2018;7:48. - 10. Zhao X, Yu X, Zhang X. The role of peer support education model
in management of glucose and lipid levels in patients with type 2
diabetes mellitus in Chinese adults. J Diabetes Res 2019;2019:8.
11. Assah FK, Atanga EN, Enoru S, Sobngwi E, Mbanya JC.
Community‑based peer support significantly improves metabolic
control in people with Type 2 diabetes in Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Diabet Med 2015;32:886‑9.
12. Karimian S, Atashzadeh‑Shoorideh F, Moosavi S, Ilkhani M,
Naderiravesh N, Salmany F. Survey of comparing discharge
time nursing education with the education standards of diabetes
type 2 patients in hospitals affiliated in Yazd University of Medical
Sciences in 2015. Iran J Endocrinol Metab 2017;19:84‑90.
13. Tol A, Baghbanian A, Mohebbi B, Shojaeizadeh D, Azam K,
Shahmirzadi SE, et al. Empowerment assessment and influential
factors among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Metab
Disord 2013;12:6.
14. Wingate L, Graffy J, Holman D, Simmons D. Can peer support be
cost saving? An economic evaluation of RAPSID: A randomized
controlled trial of peer support in diabetes compared to usual
care alone in East of England communities. BMJ Open Diabetes
Res Care 2017;5:e000328.
15. Fisher EB, Earp JA, Maman S, Zolotor A. Cross‑cultural
and international adaptation of peer support for diabetes
management. Fam Pract 2010;27 Suppl 1:i6‑16.
16. Johansson T, Keller S, Winkler H, Ostermann T, Weitgasser R,
Sönnichsen AC. Effectiveness of a peer support programme
versus usual care in disease management of diabetes
mellitus type 2 regarding improvement of metabolic control:
A cluster‑randomised controlled trial. J Diabetes Res 2016;2016:10.
17. Smith SM, Paul G, Kelly A, Whitford DL, O’Shea E, O’Dowd T.
Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: Cluster randomised
controlled trial. BMJ 2011;342:d715.
18. Peimani M, Monjazebi F, Ghodssi‑Ghassemabadi R,
Nasli‑Esfahani E. A peer support intervention in improving
glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ
Couns 2018;101:460‑6.
19. Ahmadi Z, Sadeghi T, Loripoor M, Khademi Z. Comparative
assessment the effect of self‑care behavior education by health
care provider and peer on HbA1c level in diabetic patients. IJEM
2017;19:144‑50.
20. Rashidi K, Safavi M, Yahyavi H, Farahani H. The impact of peers’
support on the hemoglobin A1C and fasting blood sugar level of
patients with type 2 diabetes. Indian J Med Special 2017;8:7‑12.
21. Nesari M, Zakerimoghadam M, Rajab A, Bassampour S,
Faghihzadeh S. Effect of telephone follow‐up on adherence to a
diabetes therapeutic regimen. Japan J Nurs Sci 2010;7:121‑8.
22. Saeid Pour J, Jafari M, Ghazi Asgar M, Dayani Dardashti H,
Eymoorzadeh E. The impact of self‑care education on life quality
of diabetic patients. J Health Adm 2013;16:26‑36.
23. Shahsavari A, Bakhshandeh Bavarsad M. Is telenursing an
effective method to control BMI and HbA1c in illiterate patients
aged 50 years and older with type 2 diabetes? A randomized
controlled clinical trial. J Caring Sci 2020;9:73‑9.
24. Shahsavari A, Foroghi S. The effectiveness of telenursing on
adherence to treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Iran J
Endocrinol Metab 2015;17:138‑45.
25. Burroughs TE, Desikan R, Waterman BM, Gilin D, McGill J.
Development and validation of the diabetes quality of life brief
clinical inventory. Diabetes Spectr 2004;17:41‑9.
26. Ghasemi M, Hosseini H, Sabouhi F. Effect of peer group
education on the quality of life of elderly individuals with
diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res
2019;24:44‑9.
27. Simmons D, Prevost AT, Bunn C, Holman D, Parker RA, Cohn S,
et al. Impact of community based peer support in type 2 diabetes:
A cluster randomised controlled trial of individual and/or group
approaches. PLoS One 2015;10:e0120277.
28. Kong LN, Hu P, Yang L, Cui D. The effectiveness of peer support
on self‐efficacy and quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes:
A systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAN 2019;75:711‑22
)