Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, and Vice Chancellery of Research and Technology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Isfahan Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center (IGHRC), Isfahan University or Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran,
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To determine functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) aspects, there should
be a guideline to retrieve documents in this area for researchers with different levels of knowledge
about these disorders. the objective of this study was conducted in order to compile different terms
related to different categories of these disorders and to determine the sensitivity of them.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To set a proper search, some strategies were used to enhance
the precision and sensitivity. After preparing the list of terms according to some sources such as
thesauruses, Rome classification, related review articles, and so on, they were divided into seven
categories and the queries in each of them were searched on the Scopus.
RESULTS: The sensitivity for each of the terms in categories were calculated, and the highest values
were as follow: FGIDs with 189 queries (“digestive* system* function* disorder*”), irritable bowel
syndrome with 142 queries (“irritable colon*”), functional constipation with 13 queries (“function*
disorder*” and constipation), functional diarrhea with 16 queries (“function* disorder*” and diarrhea),
functional bloating with 29 queries (“function* disorder*” and bloat*), Functional Dyspepsia with 29
queries (“functional dyspep*”), and neurogenic bowel with 7 queries (“neurogenic bowel*”).
CONCLUSION: Given the values calculated for sensitivity, and considering the type of study, in
order to retrieve documents in this area, it is necessary to apply all or part of the proposed queries
to the search strategy.
Keywords
Taleie D. Functional gastrointestinal disorders and traditional
medicine in Iran. J Islamic Iran Tradit Med 2014;5:116-23.
2. Jafari-Naiemi M, Isvand F. Clustering of Functional Gastrointestinal
Disorders (Dissertation). Isfahan: Isfahan University; 2011.
Available from: http://engold.ui.ac.ir/~m.rezaei/research/
IsvandJafari.pdf [4/7/2017].
3. Maleki I, Hosseini H, Khalilian A, Taghavi T, Niksolat F. Effects
of psycho-education on quality of life in patients with irritible
bowel syndrom. J Res Rehabil Sci 2007;5:39-45.
4. Moghadaszadeh M, Fatahi E, Bonyadi M, Shirzadeh M.
Effect of food allergen exculsion on symptoms and quality
of life in irritable bowel syndrome. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci
2012;14:86-90.
5. Bagherian R, Pourkazem T, Nouri A, Adibi P. The effects of stress
management training on symptoms of medical treatment-resistant
functional dyspepsia. Govaresh 2009;14:15-22.
6. Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Talley NJ, Thompson WG,
Whitehead WE, editors. Rome II: The Functional Gastrointestinal
Disorders. USA: McLean: Degnon Associates; 2000.
7. Drossman DA. Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional
gastrointestinal disorders. In: Rome III diagnostic criteria
for functional gastrointestinal disorders (3rd ed). McLean:
Degnon Associates, Inc.; 2006. URL: Available from:
http://www.romecriteria.org/assets/pdf. [Last accessed
2018 Jun 01].
8. Drossman DA, Hasler WL. Rome IV-functional GI disorders:
Disorders of gut-brain interaction. Gastroenterology
2016;150:1257-61.
9. Abedi M, Ashrafi-Rizi H, Zare-Farashbandi F, Nouri R,
Hassanzadeh A. Comparison on information-seeking behavior
of postgraduated students in Isfahan University of Medical
Sciences and University of Isfahan in writing dissertation based
on Kuhlthau model of information search process. J Educ Health
Promot 2014;3:88.
10. Ashtari S, Sorouri M, Moghimi-Dehkordi B, Pourhoseingholi MA,
Safaee A, Vahedi M, et al. Prevalence of functional bowel disorders
in Tehran province: A pop ulation based study. J Knowled Health
2011;6:31-9.
11. Shiri AA. Recall and Precision. Encyclopedia of Library and
Information Sciences. URL: Available from: http://portal.nlai.
ir/daka/Wiki. [Last accessed 2018 Jun 01].
12. Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Hedges Team. EMBASE search
strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving
methodologically sound systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol
2007;60:29-33.
13. Gehanno JF, Rollin L, Le Jean T, Louvel A, Darmoni S, Shaw
W. Precision and recall of search strategies for identifying
studies on return-to-work in Medline. J Occup Rehabil
2009;19:223-30.
)