Journal of Education and Health Promotion

Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

. Roya Naemi 1
. Hamid Reza Barikani 2
. Leila Shahmoradi 3

1 Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Department of Health Information Management, School of Paramedical Sciences, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

2 Dental Implant Research Center, Dental Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Dental Implant Research Center, Dental Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, 4 Halal Research Center of IRI, FDA, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of dental implant quality register has been well‑documented.
However, no systematic review conducted on dental implant quality register can be found in the
literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to study the existed dental implant quality registries
to explain the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic study was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web
of Science, and Embase databases. For evaluating dental implant quality registers, all studies in
the English language were examined with no time limitation. Case reports, conference abstracts,
and letters to the editor were excluded. The analysis of the quality of the studies was done by the
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology checklist.
RESULTS: The primary search identified 5565 articles. After eliminating duplicate articles and articles
that did not meet the inclusion criteria and reviewing 40 full texts, 11 studies were included in this
study. In this review, seven countries as Sweden, the USA, Canada, Germany, Finland, Australia,
and South Korea had dental implant quality registers. Furthermore, the goals of dental implant quality
registers were classified into the categories of research, epidemiology, administrative, clinical, and
surveillance.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide dentists and other stakeholders useful information
on the existed dental implant quality registers and databases worldwide. It also provides a framework
of the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registry. The establishment of
dental implant quality register will be beneficial for societies and also allows them to control the
complications of dental implants in future.

Keywords

Database management systems
dental implants
registries
  1. Tey  VH, Phillips  R, Tan  K. Patient-related outcome measures
    with implant therapy after 5  years. Clin Oral Implants Res
    2017;28:683‑8.
    2. Ritter  L, Reiz  S, Rothamel  D, Dreiseidler  T, Karapetian  V,
    Scheer M, et al. Registration accuracy of three-dimensional surface
    and cone beam computed tomography data for virtual implant
    planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:447‑52.
    3. Rambabu  T, Koneru  S. Reasons for use and nonuse of dental
    services among people visiting a dental hospital in urban India:
    A descriptive study. J Educ Health Promot 2018;7:99.
    4. Esposito  M, Ardebili  Y, Worthington  HV. Interventions for
    replacing missing teeth: Different types of dental implants.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(7):1‑9. [doi: 10.1002/14651858.
    CD003815.pub4].
    5. Pye A, Lockhart D, Dawson M, Murray C, Smith A. A review of
    dental implants and infection. J Hosp Infect 2009;72:104‑10.
    6. Kalhori RP, Ziapour A, Kianipour N, Foroughinia A. A study of
    the relationship between lifestyle and happiness of students at
    Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences over 2015–2016. Ann
    Trop Med Public Health 2017;10:1004.
    7. Prasad S, Hambrook C, Reigle E, Sherman K, Bansal N, Hefti A.
    Implant treatment in the predoctoral clinic: A  retrospective
    database study of 1091 patients. J Prosthodont 2017;26:559‑67.
    8. Guo YN, Dudley JE, Logan RM, Richards LC. Implant dentistry in
    Australia: The present and future. A survey of Australian dentists
    and specialists. Aust Dent J 2017;62:500‑9.
    9. Dental Implants. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
    gov/books/NBK470448. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 11].
    10. Gurgel BC, Montenegro SC, Dantas PM, Pascoal AL, Lima KC,
    Calderon PD. Frequency of peri-implant diseases and associated
    factors. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1211‑7.
  2. 11. Kaur S, Telgi RL, Tandon V, Kaur R, Bhattacharyya S.  Parents
    outlook on preventive dental modalities for their children in
    Udham Singh Nagar, India. J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:60.
    12. Derks  J, Schaller  D, Håkansson J, Wennström JL, Tomasi  C,
    Berglundh  T. Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a
    Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri‑implantitis. J Dent Res
    2016;95:43‑9.
    13. Quirynen M, De Soete M, Van Steenberghe D.  Infectious risks
    for oral implants: A review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants
    Res 2002;13:1‑9.
    14. Papaspyridakos P, Barizan Bordin T, Kim YJ, DeFuria C, Pagni SE,
    Chochlidakis K, et al. Implant survival rates and biologic
    complications with implant-supported fixed complete dental
    prostheses: A retrospective study with up to 12-year follow-up.
    Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:881‑93.
    15. Brägger U, Karoussis  I, Persson  R, Pjetursson  B, Salvi  G,
    Lang NP. Technical and biological complications/failures with
    single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: A 10-year
    prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:326‑34.
    16. Michelinakis G, Sharrock A, Barclay CW. Identification of dental
    implants through the use of Implant Recognition Software (IRS).
    Int Dent J 2006;56:203‑8.
    17. Beam  MM. A  dental implant-Based registration method for
    measuring mandibular kinematics using cone beam computed
    tomography Based fluoroscopy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
    2014;29:798‑806.
    18. Michelinakis G, Sharrock A, Barclay CW.  Auditing knowledge
    toward leveraging organizational IQ in healthcare organizations.
    Healthc Inform Res 2016;22:110‑9.
    19. Shahmoradi  L, Ahmadi  M, Sadoughi  F, Piri  Z, Gohari  MR.
    A comprehensive model for executing knowledge management
    audits in organizations: A  systematic review. Health Care
    Manag (Frederick) 2015;34:28‑40.
    20. Klinge B, Sanz M, Alcoforado G, Bienz SP, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H,
    et al. Dental implant register: Summary and consensus statements
    of group 2. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018. Clin Oral
    Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 18:157‑9.
    21. Naemi R, Shahmoradi L. Global experience of diabetes registries:
    A systematic review. In: Advances in Experimental Medicine and
    Biology. New York: Springer; 2020.
    22. Shamseer  L, Moher  D, Clarke  M, Ghersi  D, Liberati  A,
    Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review
    and meta‑analysis protocols (PRISMA‑P) 2015: Elaboration and
    explanation. BMJ 2015;350:g7647.
    23. Ziapour A, Khatony A, Jafari F, Kianipour N. Prediction of the
    dimensions of the spiritual well-being of students at Kermanshah
    university of medical sciences, Iran: The roles of demographic
    variables. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:VC05.
    24. Jemt  T. Implant Survival in the Edentulous Jaw‑30  Years of
    Experience. Part I: A Retro‑Prospective Multivariate Regression
    Analysis of Overall Implant Failure in 4,585 Consecutively Treated
    Arches. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:425‑35.
    25. Kordbacheh Changi  K, Finkelstein  J, Papapanou  PN.
    Peri‑implantitis prevalence, incidence rate, and risk factors:
    A study of electronic health records at a U.S. dental school. Clin
    Oral Implants Res 2019;30:306‑14.
    26. Weyant  RJ, Burt  BA. An assessment of survival rates and
    within‑patient clustering of failures for endosseous oral implants.
    J Dent Res 1993;72:2‑8.
    27. Carr  AB, Revuru  VS, Lohse  CM. Association of Systemic
    Conditions with Dental Implant Failures in 6,384 Patients During
    a 31‑Year Follow‑up Period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
    2017;32:1153‑61.
    28. Starr CB, Maksoud MA. Implant treatment in an urban general
    dentistry residency program: A 7‑year retrospective study. J Oral
    Implantol 2006;32:142‑7.
    29. Becker W, Hujoel P, Becker BE, Wohrle P. Survival Rates and
    Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide-Coated Implants (T i
    U nite™). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:654‑60.
    30. Arlin ML. Analysis of 435 screw‑vent dental implants placed in
    161 patients: Software enhancement of clinical evaluation. Implant
    Dent 2002;11:58‑66.
    31. Krebs  M, Schmenger  K, Neumann  K, Weigl  P, Moser  W,
    Nentwig  GH. Long‑term evaluation of ANKYLOS® dental
    implants, part i: 20‑year life table analysis of a longitudinal
    study of more than 12,500 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
    2015;17 Suppl 1:e275‑86.
    32. Antalainen  AK, Helminen  M, Forss  H, Sándor GK, Wolff  J.
    Assessment of removed dental implants in Finland from 1994 to
    2012. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1612‑8.
    33. Guo Q, Lalji R, Le AV, Judge RB, Bailey D, Thomson W, et al.
    Survival rates and complication types for single implants
    provided at the Melbourne Dental School. Aust Dent J
    2015;60:353‑61.
    34. Park  SH, Song  YW, Sanz‑Martín I, Cha  JK, Lee  JS, Jung  UW.
    Clinical benefits of ridge preservation for implant placement
    compared to natural healing in maxillary teeth: A retrospective
    study. J Clin Periodontol 2020;47:382‑91.
    35. Rafie E, Karamali M, Bahadori M, Yazdanian M, Ravangard R.
    Needs assessment and research priorities in the oral and dental
    health with health promotion approach in Iran. J Educ Health
    Promot 2019;8:93.
    36. Cadilhac  DA, Kim  J, Lannin  NA, Kapral  MK, Schwamm  LH,
    Dennis MS, et al. National stroke registries for monitoring and
    improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic review. Int
    J Stroke 2016;11:28‑40.
    37. Krysinska  K, Sachdev  PS, Breitner  J, Kivipelto  M, Kukull  W,
    Brodaty  H. Dementia registries around the globe and their
    applications: A  systematic review. Alzheimers Dement
    2017;13:1031‑47.
    38. Gliklich  R, Dreyer  N, Leavy  M, eds. Registries for Evaluating
    Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. Third edition. Two volumes. 
    Prepared by the Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc.,
    a Quintiles company] under Contract No. 290 2005 00351 TO7.)
    AHRQ Publication No. 13 (14)‑EHC111. Rockville, MD: Agency
    for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2014. http://www.
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/registries-guide-3.cfm.
    39. Viviani L, Zolin A, Mehta A, Olesen HV. The European Cystic
    Fibrosis Society Patient Registry: Valuable lessons learned on how
    to sustain a disease registry. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014;9:81.
    40. Stey AM, Russell MM, Ko CY, Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Gibbons MM.
    Clinical registries and quality measurement in surgery:
    A systematic review. Surgery 2015;157:381‑95.
    41. Mohammadi M, Ziapoor A, Mahboubi M, Faroukhi A, Amani N,
    Hydarpour F, et al. Performance evaluation of hospitals under
    supervision of kermanshah medical sciences using pabonlasoty
    diagram of a five-year period (2008-2012). Life Sci J 2014;11:77-81.
    42. Zaletel  M, Kralj  M, Magajne  M, Doupi  P. Methodological
    Guidelines and Recommendations for Efficient and Rational
    Governance of Patient Registries. Ljubljana: National Institute
    of Public Health; 2015.
    43. Myers  J, Frieden  TR, Bherwani  KM, Henning  KJ. Ethics in
    public health research: Privacy and public health at risk: Public
    health confidentiality in the digital age. Am J Public Health
    2008;98:793‑801.
    44. Tikkinen‑Piri  C, Rohunen  A, Markkula  J. EU General Data
    Protection Regulation: Changes and implications for personal
    data collecting companies. Comput Law Secur Rev 2018;34:134‑53.
    45. Gissler M, Haukka J. Finnish health and social welfare registers
    in epidemiological research. Nor Epidemiol 2004;14:113‑20.
    46. Mandavia  R, Knight  A, Phillips  J, Mossialos  E, Littlejohns  P,
    Schilder A. What are the essential features of a successful surgical
    registry? A systematic review. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017373.
    47. Davids  MR, Eastwood  JB, Selwood  NH, Arogundade  FA,  Ashuntantang G, Benghanem Gharbi M, et al. A renal registry
    for Africa: First steps. Clin Kidney J 2016;9:162‑7.
    48. Nilsson  E, Orwelius  L, Kristenson  M. Patient-reported
    outcomes in the Swedish national quality registers. J Intern Med
    2016;279:141‑53.
    49. Wilson I, Bohm E, Lübbeke A, Lyman S, Overgaard S, Rolfson O,
    et al. Orthopaedic registries with patient‑reported outcome
    measures. EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:357‑67.
    50. Breckenridge  K, Bekker  HL, Gibbons  E, van der Veer  SN,
    Abbott  D, Briançon S, et al. How to routinely collect data on
    patient‑reported outcome and experience measures in renal
    registries in Europe: An expert consensus meeting. Nephrol Dial
    Transplant 2015;30:1605‑14.
    51. S m e e t s   R , H e n n i n g s e n   A , J u n g   O , H e i l a n d   M ,
    Hammächer C, Stein  JM. Definition, etiology, prevention and
    treatment of peri‑implantitis A review. Head Face Med 2014;10:34.
    52. Derks  J, Tomasi  C. Peri-implant health and disease.
    A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol
    2015;42:S158‑71.
    53. Salvi GE, Cosgarea R, Sculean A. Prevalence and Mechanisms of
    Peri‑implant Diseases. J Dent Res 2017;96:31‑7.
    54. Shahmoradi  L, Ahmadi  M, Rezaei  P. Electronic Health
    Records: The Structure, Content and Assessment. Tehran: Jafari
    Publications; 2008.p. 130‑5.
    55. Muir D. Is there anything to learn from a national joint registry?
    Foot Ankle Clin 2017;22:465‑75.
    56. Bergin  K, Moore  E, McQuilten  Z, Wood  E, Augustson  B,
    Blacklock H, et al. Design and development of the Australian and
    New Zealand (ANZ) myeloma and related diseases registry. BMC
    Med Res Methodol 2016;16:151.
    57. von Bültzingslöwen I, Östholm H, Gahnberg  L, Ericson  D,
    Wennström JL, Paulander J. Swedish quality registry for caries
    and periodontal diseases A framework for quality development
    in dentistry. Int Dent J 2019;69:361‑8.
    58. Ljung R, Lundgren F, Appelquist M, Cederlund A. The Swedish
    dental health register‑validation study of remaining and intact
    teeth. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:116.
    59. Shahmoradi  L. Letter to the editor: Integration of health
    information systems to promote health. Iran J Public Health
    2016;45:1096‑7.
    60. Ahmadi M, Shahmoradi L, Barabadi M, Hoseini F. Evaluation of
    usability in hospital information systems 9241 standard isometric.
    J Hakim Res 2010;13:226‑33.
    61. Ahmadi H, Nilashi M, Shahmoradi L, Ibrahim O, Sadoughi F,
    Alizadeh M, et al. The moderating effect of hospital size on inter
    and intra‑organizational factors of Hospital Information System
    adoption. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2018;134:124‑49.
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Volume 11, Issue 5
June 2021
Pages 1-9

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us