Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Department of Health Information Management, School of Paramedical Sciences, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
2 Dental Implant Research Center, Dental Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Dental Implant Research Center, Dental Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, 4 Halal Research Center of IRI, FDA, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of dental implant quality register has been well‑documented.
However, no systematic review conducted on dental implant quality register can be found in the
literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to study the existed dental implant quality registries
to explain the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic study was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web
of Science, and Embase databases. For evaluating dental implant quality registers, all studies in
the English language were examined with no time limitation. Case reports, conference abstracts,
and letters to the editor were excluded. The analysis of the quality of the studies was done by the
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology checklist.
RESULTS: The primary search identified 5565 articles. After eliminating duplicate articles and articles
that did not meet the inclusion criteria and reviewing 40 full texts, 11 studies were included in this
study. In this review, seven countries as Sweden, the USA, Canada, Germany, Finland, Australia,
and South Korea had dental implant quality registers. Furthermore, the goals of dental implant quality
registers were classified into the categories of research, epidemiology, administrative, clinical, and
surveillance.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide dentists and other stakeholders useful information
on the existed dental implant quality registers and databases worldwide. It also provides a framework
of the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registry. The establishment of
dental implant quality register will be beneficial for societies and also allows them to control the
complications of dental implants in future.
Keywords
- Tey VH, Phillips R, Tan K. Patient-related outcome measures
with implant therapy after 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res
2017;28:683‑8.
2. Ritter L, Reiz S, Rothamel D, Dreiseidler T, Karapetian V,
Scheer M, et al. Registration accuracy of three-dimensional surface
and cone beam computed tomography data for virtual implant
planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:447‑52.
3. Rambabu T, Koneru S. Reasons for use and nonuse of dental
services among people visiting a dental hospital in urban India:
A descriptive study. J Educ Health Promot 2018;7:99.
4. Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for
replacing missing teeth: Different types of dental implants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(7):1‑9. [doi: 10.1002/14651858.
CD003815.pub4].
5. Pye A, Lockhart D, Dawson M, Murray C, Smith A. A review of
dental implants and infection. J Hosp Infect 2009;72:104‑10.
6. Kalhori RP, Ziapour A, Kianipour N, Foroughinia A. A study of
the relationship between lifestyle and happiness of students at
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences over 2015–2016. Ann
Trop Med Public Health 2017;10:1004.
7. Prasad S, Hambrook C, Reigle E, Sherman K, Bansal N, Hefti A.
Implant treatment in the predoctoral clinic: A retrospective
database study of 1091 patients. J Prosthodont 2017;26:559‑67.
8. Guo YN, Dudley JE, Logan RM, Richards LC. Implant dentistry in
Australia: The present and future. A survey of Australian dentists
and specialists. Aust Dent J 2017;62:500‑9.
9. Dental Implants. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/books/NBK470448. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 11].
10. Gurgel BC, Montenegro SC, Dantas PM, Pascoal AL, Lima KC,
Calderon PD. Frequency of peri-implant diseases and associated
factors. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1211‑7. - 11. Kaur S, Telgi RL, Tandon V, Kaur R, Bhattacharyya S. Parents
outlook on preventive dental modalities for their children in
Udham Singh Nagar, India. J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:60.
12. Derks J, Schaller D, Håkansson J, Wennström JL, Tomasi C,
Berglundh T. Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a
Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri‑implantitis. J Dent Res
2016;95:43‑9.
13. Quirynen M, De Soete M, Van Steenberghe D. Infectious risks
for oral implants: A review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants
Res 2002;13:1‑9.
14. Papaspyridakos P, Barizan Bordin T, Kim YJ, DeFuria C, Pagni SE,
Chochlidakis K, et al. Implant survival rates and biologic
complications with implant-supported fixed complete dental
prostheses: A retrospective study with up to 12-year follow-up.
Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:881‑93.
15. Brägger U, Karoussis I, Persson R, Pjetursson B, Salvi G,
Lang NP. Technical and biological complications/failures with
single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: A 10-year
prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:326‑34.
16. Michelinakis G, Sharrock A, Barclay CW. Identification of dental
implants through the use of Implant Recognition Software (IRS).
Int Dent J 2006;56:203‑8.
17. Beam MM. A dental implant-Based registration method for
measuring mandibular kinematics using cone beam computed
tomography Based fluoroscopy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
2014;29:798‑806.
18. Michelinakis G, Sharrock A, Barclay CW. Auditing knowledge
toward leveraging organizational IQ in healthcare organizations.
Healthc Inform Res 2016;22:110‑9.
19. Shahmoradi L, Ahmadi M, Sadoughi F, Piri Z, Gohari MR.
A comprehensive model for executing knowledge management
audits in organizations: A systematic review. Health Care
Manag (Frederick) 2015;34:28‑40.
20. Klinge B, Sanz M, Alcoforado G, Bienz SP, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H,
et al. Dental implant register: Summary and consensus statements
of group 2. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018. Clin Oral
Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 18:157‑9.
21. Naemi R, Shahmoradi L. Global experience of diabetes registries:
A systematic review. In: Advances in Experimental Medicine and
Biology. New York: Springer; 2020.
22. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A,
Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review
and meta‑analysis protocols (PRISMA‑P) 2015: Elaboration and
explanation. BMJ 2015;350:g7647.
23. Ziapour A, Khatony A, Jafari F, Kianipour N. Prediction of the
dimensions of the spiritual well-being of students at Kermanshah
university of medical sciences, Iran: The roles of demographic
variables. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:VC05.
24. Jemt T. Implant Survival in the Edentulous Jaw‑30 Years of
Experience. Part I: A Retro‑Prospective Multivariate Regression
Analysis of Overall Implant Failure in 4,585 Consecutively Treated
Arches. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:425‑35.
25. Kordbacheh Changi K, Finkelstein J, Papapanou PN.
Peri‑implantitis prevalence, incidence rate, and risk factors:
A study of electronic health records at a U.S. dental school. Clin
Oral Implants Res 2019;30:306‑14.
26. Weyant RJ, Burt BA. An assessment of survival rates and
within‑patient clustering of failures for endosseous oral implants.
J Dent Res 1993;72:2‑8.
27. Carr AB, Revuru VS, Lohse CM. Association of Systemic
Conditions with Dental Implant Failures in 6,384 Patients During
a 31‑Year Follow‑up Period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
2017;32:1153‑61.
28. Starr CB, Maksoud MA. Implant treatment in an urban general
dentistry residency program: A 7‑year retrospective study. J Oral
Implantol 2006;32:142‑7.
29. Becker W, Hujoel P, Becker BE, Wohrle P. Survival Rates and
Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide-Coated Implants (T i
U nite™). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:654‑60.
30. Arlin ML. Analysis of 435 screw‑vent dental implants placed in
161 patients: Software enhancement of clinical evaluation. Implant
Dent 2002;11:58‑66.
31. Krebs M, Schmenger K, Neumann K, Weigl P, Moser W,
Nentwig GH. Long‑term evaluation of ANKYLOS® dental
implants, part i: 20‑year life table analysis of a longitudinal
study of more than 12,500 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
2015;17 Suppl 1:e275‑86.
32. Antalainen AK, Helminen M, Forss H, Sándor GK, Wolff J.
Assessment of removed dental implants in Finland from 1994 to
2012. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1612‑8.
33. Guo Q, Lalji R, Le AV, Judge RB, Bailey D, Thomson W, et al.
Survival rates and complication types for single implants
provided at the Melbourne Dental School. Aust Dent J
2015;60:353‑61.
34. Park SH, Song YW, Sanz‑Martín I, Cha JK, Lee JS, Jung UW.
Clinical benefits of ridge preservation for implant placement
compared to natural healing in maxillary teeth: A retrospective
study. J Clin Periodontol 2020;47:382‑91.
35. Rafie E, Karamali M, Bahadori M, Yazdanian M, Ravangard R.
Needs assessment and research priorities in the oral and dental
health with health promotion approach in Iran. J Educ Health
Promot 2019;8:93.
36. Cadilhac DA, Kim J, Lannin NA, Kapral MK, Schwamm LH,
Dennis MS, et al. National stroke registries for monitoring and
improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic review. Int
J Stroke 2016;11:28‑40.
37. Krysinska K, Sachdev PS, Breitner J, Kivipelto M, Kukull W,
Brodaty H. Dementia registries around the globe and their
applications: A systematic review. Alzheimers Dement
2017;13:1031‑47.
38. Gliklich R, Dreyer N, Leavy M, eds. Registries for Evaluating
Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. Third edition. Two volumes.
Prepared by the Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc.,
a Quintiles company] under Contract No. 290 2005 00351 TO7.)
AHRQ Publication No. 13 (14)‑EHC111. Rockville, MD: Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2014. http://www.
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/registries-guide-3.cfm.
39. Viviani L, Zolin A, Mehta A, Olesen HV. The European Cystic
Fibrosis Society Patient Registry: Valuable lessons learned on how
to sustain a disease registry. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014;9:81.
40. Stey AM, Russell MM, Ko CY, Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Gibbons MM.
Clinical registries and quality measurement in surgery:
A systematic review. Surgery 2015;157:381‑95.
41. Mohammadi M, Ziapoor A, Mahboubi M, Faroukhi A, Amani N,
Hydarpour F, et al. Performance evaluation of hospitals under
supervision of kermanshah medical sciences using pabonlasoty
diagram of a five-year period (2008-2012). Life Sci J 2014;11:77-81.
42. Zaletel M, Kralj M, Magajne M, Doupi P. Methodological
Guidelines and Recommendations for Efficient and Rational
Governance of Patient Registries. Ljubljana: National Institute
of Public Health; 2015.
43. Myers J, Frieden TR, Bherwani KM, Henning KJ. Ethics in
public health research: Privacy and public health at risk: Public
health confidentiality in the digital age. Am J Public Health
2008;98:793‑801.
44. Tikkinen‑Piri C, Rohunen A, Markkula J. EU General Data
Protection Regulation: Changes and implications for personal
data collecting companies. Comput Law Secur Rev 2018;34:134‑53.
45. Gissler M, Haukka J. Finnish health and social welfare registers
in epidemiological research. Nor Epidemiol 2004;14:113‑20.
46. Mandavia R, Knight A, Phillips J, Mossialos E, Littlejohns P,
Schilder A. What are the essential features of a successful surgical
registry? A systematic review. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017373.
47. Davids MR, Eastwood JB, Selwood NH, Arogundade FA, Ashuntantang G, Benghanem Gharbi M, et al. A renal registry
for Africa: First steps. Clin Kidney J 2016;9:162‑7.
48. Nilsson E, Orwelius L, Kristenson M. Patient-reported
outcomes in the Swedish national quality registers. J Intern Med
2016;279:141‑53.
49. Wilson I, Bohm E, Lübbeke A, Lyman S, Overgaard S, Rolfson O,
et al. Orthopaedic registries with patient‑reported outcome
measures. EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:357‑67.
50. Breckenridge K, Bekker HL, Gibbons E, van der Veer SN,
Abbott D, Briançon S, et al. How to routinely collect data on
patient‑reported outcome and experience measures in renal
registries in Europe: An expert consensus meeting. Nephrol Dial
Transplant 2015;30:1605‑14.
51. S m e e t s R , H e n n i n g s e n A , J u n g O , H e i l a n d M ,
Hammächer C, Stein JM. Definition, etiology, prevention and
treatment of peri‑implantitis A review. Head Face Med 2014;10:34.
52. Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease.
A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol
2015;42:S158‑71.
53. Salvi GE, Cosgarea R, Sculean A. Prevalence and Mechanisms of
Peri‑implant Diseases. J Dent Res 2017;96:31‑7.
54. Shahmoradi L, Ahmadi M, Rezaei P. Electronic Health
Records: The Structure, Content and Assessment. Tehran: Jafari
Publications; 2008.p. 130‑5.
55. Muir D. Is there anything to learn from a national joint registry?
Foot Ankle Clin 2017;22:465‑75.
56. Bergin K, Moore E, McQuilten Z, Wood E, Augustson B,
Blacklock H, et al. Design and development of the Australian and
New Zealand (ANZ) myeloma and related diseases registry. BMC
Med Res Methodol 2016;16:151.
57. von Bültzingslöwen I, Östholm H, Gahnberg L, Ericson D,
Wennström JL, Paulander J. Swedish quality registry for caries
and periodontal diseases A framework for quality development
in dentistry. Int Dent J 2019;69:361‑8.
58. Ljung R, Lundgren F, Appelquist M, Cederlund A. The Swedish
dental health register‑validation study of remaining and intact
teeth. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:116.
59. Shahmoradi L. Letter to the editor: Integration of health
information systems to promote health. Iran J Public Health
2016;45:1096‑7.
60. Ahmadi M, Shahmoradi L, Barabadi M, Hoseini F. Evaluation of
usability in hospital information systems 9241 standard isometric.
J Hakim Res 2010;13:226‑33.
61. Ahmadi H, Nilashi M, Shahmoradi L, Ibrahim O, Sadoughi F,
Alizadeh M, et al. The moderating effect of hospital size on inter
and intra‑organizational factors of Hospital Information System
adoption. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2018;134:124‑49.
)