Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Luca F Valle
- . Palak Kundu
- . Stephanie M Yoon
- . J Daniel Pennington
- . Minsong Cao
- . Percy P Lee
- . Amar U Kishan
Abstract
Malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) represents the most common indication
for emergent radiotherapy. First‑year residents must quickly gain competence in managing
this condition prior to taking call for the department. We sought to develop a hybrid
didactic/simulation exercise to assist first‑year radiation oncology residents in developing a
skillset relevant to treating a MESCC case in an emergency situation. This was a prospective,
qualitative survey study conducted at the University of California, Los Angeles, during the
years 2014–2016. Following an introductory lecture during orientation for academic years
2014–2016, residents completed a simulated consultation on a patient with suspected MESCC.
Subsequently, they worked with radiation therapists to complete the clinical treatment
procedure (including field placement and manual calculation of monitor units needed to
deliver the prescribed dose) to a phantom placed on a linear accelerator. Residents were
then surveyed about whether the exercise increased confidence in their ability to successfully
complete a consult, and urgent treatment if needed, for MESCC. All residents agreed or
strongly agreed that this exercise had improved this ability, and all agreed or strongly
agreed that the exercise was valuable and should be retained in the curriculum. Simulated
consultation and treatment of MESCC provides new residents with increased confidence and
knowledge regarding this relatively common indication for emergent radiation.
Keywords
et al. Radiotherapy for oncologic emergencies on weekends:
Examining reasons for treatment and patterns of practice at a
Canadian cancer centre. Curr Oncol 2009;16:55‑60.
2. Hirsch AE, Handal R, Daniels J, Levin‑Epstein R, Denunzio NJ,
Dillon J, et al. Quantitatively and qualitatively augmenting
medical student knowledge of oncology and radiation oncology:
An update on the impact of the oncology education initiative.
J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:115‑20.
3. Jagadeesan VS, Raleigh DR, Koshy M, Howard AR, Chmura SJ,
Golden DW. A national radiation oncology medical student clerkship
survey: Didactic curricular components increase confidence in
clinical competency. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;88:51‑6.
4. Shaverdian N, Yoo SM, Cook R, Chang EM, Jiang N, Yuan Y,
Sandler K, et al. Gaps in radiation therapy awareness: Results from
an educational multi‑institutional survey of United States internal
medicine residents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017;98:1153-61.
5. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical
review of simulation‑based medical education research:
2003‑2009. Med Educ 2010;44:50‑63.
6. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. Revisiting “a
critical review of simulation‑based medical education research:
2003‑2009.” Med Educ 2016;50:986‑91.
7. Ryall T, Judd BK, Gordon CJ. Simulation‑based assessments in
health professional education: A systematic review. J Multidiscip
Healthc 2016;9:69‑82.
8. Brown LC, Laack TA, Ma DJ, Olivier KR, Laack NN.
Multidisciplinary medical simulation: A novel educational
approach to preparing radiation oncology residents for oncologic
emergent on‑call treatments. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2014;90:705‑6.
9. Holliday EB, Swanick CW, McAvoy SA, Walker GV, Crane CH,
Mahajan A, et al. Development of a comprehensive clinical
radiation oncology resident didactic curriculum. J Am Coll Radiol
2016;13:1514‑6000000.
10. Barker CA, Mutter RW, Shapiro LQ, Zhang Z, Wolden SL,
Yahalom J. Contrast media use in radiation oncology: A prospective,
controlled educational intervention study with retrospective
analysis of patient outcomes. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7:967‑74.
)