Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Engracia Arceo
- . John Edlor Jurado
- . Leslee Anne Cortez 1
- . Nestor Sibug 2
- . Gestrelle Lides Sarmiento
- . Amica Coleen Lawingco
- . Carisse Carbungco
- . Raphael Enrique Tiongco
1 Department of Education, Dasmarinas, Cavite, Philippines
2 Department of Psychology, Holy Angel University, Angeles City Philippines
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the Philippines emerging as the hotspot in the Western Pacific Region for
the COVID‑19 cases, the study aimed to understand the COVID‑19 preventive behavior of Filipinos
using the health belief model (HBM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cross‑sectional study included 304 respondents recruited for
the whole month of July 2020 through various social media platforms. Participants were requested
to answer an online questionnaire, and results were analyzed using SPSS software.
RESULTS: The majority of respondents were female (71.1%), with an average age of 29,
college graduate (57.6%), and living in an area where modified general community quarantine is
implemented (63.2%). Good preventive behavior was noted among the participants, and not shaking
of hands with others and refraining from touching of surfaces were reported as the most practiced
behavior. Spearman’s correlation and Pearson’s Chi‑square showed that age and sex are significant
predictors for the HBM constructs and preventive behavior. Furthermore, results showed that cues to
action, self‑efficacy, and perceived barrier have a significant association with COVID‑19 preventive
behavior.
CONCLUSION: Findings prove that HBM is useful in understanding preventive behaviors in times
of coronavirus pandemic. Strategies that promote a supportive environment and help overcome the
perceived barriers can guide Filipinos to adopt the desired health behavior. Interventions to promote
preventive behaviors should be focused on males and younger individuals.
Keywords
- WHO. Modes of Transmission of Virus Causing COVID‑19:
Implications for IPC Precaution Recommendations. Available
from: https://www.who.int/news‑room/commentaries/
detail/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendations. [Last cited
on 2020 May 20].
2. Singh R, Adhikari R. Age‑structured impact of social distancing
on the COVID‑19 epidemic in India. 2020. p. 1‑9. Available from:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12055. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 20].
3. Michael Greenstone VN. Does Social Distancing Matter? Univ
Chicago, Becker Friedman Inst Econ Work Pap 2020; (No.
2020‑26). Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.
cfm?abstract_id=3561244. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 20].
4. Painter M, Qiu T. Political Beliefs affect Compliance with
COVID‑19 Social Distancing Orders (July 3,2020). Available at
SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3569098 or http://dx.doi.
org/10.2139/ssrn0.3569098. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 05].
5. Briscese G, Lacetera N, Mario Macis MT. Compliance with
COVID‑19 social‑distancing measures in Italy: The role of
expectations and duration. IZA Discussion Paper, 13092.
Available from: https://www.nber. Org/papers/w26916.
[Last accessed on 2020 Sep 05].
6. Shahnazi H. Assessing Preventive Health Behaviors from
COVID‑19 Based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) among People
in Golestan Province : A Cross‑Sectional Study in Northern Iran.
Infectious Disease of Poverty, 17 Nov 2020; 9 (1):57. DOI: 10.1186/
s40249‑020‑00776‑2. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 21].
7. Gomez SA. At six months, Manila enters world’s longest COVID‑19
quarantine; September 15, 2020. Available from: https://www.
efe.com/efe/english/portada/at-six-months-manila-entersworld-s-longest-covid-19-quarantine/50000260-4343512. [Last
cited on 2020 Oct 30].
8. Bloomberg. Philippines now has worst COVID‑19 outbreak
in Southeast Asia; August 7, 2020. Available from: https://
www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/08/07/asia‑pacific/
philippines‑coronavirus‑southeast‑asia/. [Last accessed on 2020
Aug 21].
9. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors
of mortality due to COVID‑19 based on an analysis of data
of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med
2020;46:846‑8.
10. Jose Regi, Narendran Meghana, Bindu Anil, Nazeema B, Manju L,
Benny PV. Public perception and preparedness for the pandemic
COVID 19: A health belief model approach. Clin Epidemiol
Glob Heal 2020; 20 June 2020:1‑6. [Doi. org/10.1016/j. cegh.
2020.06.009].
11. Bashirian S, Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Barati M, Karimi‑Shahanjarini A,
Zareian S, et al. Factors associated with preventive behaviours of
COVID‑19 among hospital staff in Iran in 2020: An application of
the Protection Motivation Theory. J Hosp Infect 2020;105:430‑3.
12. Griffith DM, Sharma G, Holliday CS, Enyia OK, Valliere M,
Semlow AR, et al. Men and COVID‑19: A biopsychosocial
approach to understanding sex differences in mortality and
recommendations for practice and policy interventions. Prev
Chronic Dis 2020;17:E63.
13. Clark C, Davila A, Regis M, Kraus S. Predictors of COVID‑19
voluntary compliance behaviors: An international investigation.
Glob Transit 2020;2:76‑82.
14. Jin JM, Bai P, He W, Wu F, Liu XF, Han DM, et al. Gender
differences in patients With COVID‑19: Focus on severity and
mortality. Front Public Health 2020;8:152.
15. Han Q, Lin Q, Ni Z, You L. Uncertainties about the transmission
routes of 2019 novel coronavirus. Influenza Other Respir Viruses
2020;14:470‑1.
16. Kampf G, Todt D, Pfaender S, Steinmann E. Persistence of - coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with
biocidal agents. J Hosp Infect 2020;104:246‑51.
17. Scott E. Community‑based infections and the potential role
of common touch surfaces as vectors for the transmission of
infectious agents in home and community settings. Am J Infect
Control 2013;41:1087‑92.
18. Kwok YL, Gralton J, McLaws ML. Face touching: A frequent
habit that has implications for hand hygiene. Am J Infect Control
2015;43:112‑4.
19. Perez‑Alba E, Nuzzolo‑Shihadeh L, Fonseca‑Ruiz A,
Aguirre‑García GM, Hernández‑Guedea MA, Perez‑Rodriguez E,
et al. Frequency of facial touching in patients with suspected
COVID‑19 during their time in the waiting room. Infect Control
Hosp Epidemiol 2020;1:1-2. doi:10.1017/ice.2020.389.
20. Alsulaiman SA. Health Crisis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia:
A Study of Saudis’ Knowledge of Coronavirus, Attitudes toward
the Ministry of Health’s Coronavirus Preventive Campaigns,
and Trust in Coronavirus Messages in the Media. ProQuest Diss
Theses May, 2018. p. 224. Available from: http://search.proquest.
com.ezp‑prod1.hul.harvard.edu/docview/2058095303?accou
ntid=11311%0Ahttps://hollis.harvard.edu/openurl/01HVD/
HVD_URL??url_ver=Z39.88‑2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt: kev:
mtx: dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:
ProQuest+. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 15].
21. Buglar ME, White KM, Robinson NG. The role of self‑efficacy in
dental patients’ brushing and flossing: Testing an extended health
belief model. Patient Educ Couns 2010;78:269‑72.
22. Sheeran P, Maki A, Montanaro E, Bryan A, Klein WM, Miles E,
et al. Supplemental material for the impact of changing attitudes,
norms, and self‑efficacy on health‑related intentions and behavior:
A meta‑analysis. Heal Psychol 2016;35:1178‑88.
23. Gammage KL, Klentrou P. Predicting osteoporosis prevention
behaviors: Health beliefs and knowledge. Am J Health Behav
2011;35:371‑82.
24. Yıldırım M, Güler A. COVID‑19 severity, self‑efficacy, knowledge,
preventive behaviors, and mental health in Turkey. Death Stud.
2020 July 16; 1‑8. Doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1793434. [Accessed
last September 20, 2020].
25. Xiao H, Zhang Y, Kong D, Li S, Yang N. The effects of social
support on sleep quality of medical staff treating patients with
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) in January and February
2020 in China. Med Sci Monit 2020;26:e923549.
26. Chou PH, Wister AV. From cues to action: Information seeking
and exercise self‑care among older adults managing chronic
illness. Can J Aging La Rev Can du Vieil 2005;24:395‑408.
27. Walker KK, Steinfort EL, Keyler MJ. Cues to Action as Motivators
for Children’s Brushing. Health Commun 2015;30:911‑21.
28. Lau LL, Hung N, Go DJ, Ferma J, Choi M, Dodd W, et al.
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of COVID‑19 among
income‑poor households in the Philippines: A cross‑sectional
study. J Glob Health 2020;10:011007.
29. Lin CY, Liao Y. Perceptions of activity‑supportive environment
and motorcycle use among urban Taiwanese adults. BMC Public
Health 2017;17:665.
30. Tan S, Cao F, Yang J. The Study on Spatial Elements of
Health‑Supportive Environment in Residential Streets
Promoting Residents’ Walking Trips. Int J Environ Res
Public Health 2020;17 (14), 5198; https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijerph 17145198. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 20].
31. Nicomedes CJ, Avila RM. An Analysis on the Panic of Filipinos
during COVID‑19 Pandemic in the 2020. March 2020. p. 1‑13.DOI:
10.13140/RG.2.2.17355.54565. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 20].
32. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S,
Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine
and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet
2020;395:912‑20.
33. Kavanagh AM, Bentley RJ, Mason KE, McVernon J,
Petrony S, Fielding J, et al. Sources, perceived usefulness
and understanding of information disseminated to families
who entered home quarantine during the H1N1 pandemic in
Victoria, Australia: a cross‑sectional study. BMC Infect Dis
2011;11:2.
)