Document Type : Original Article


Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Science, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


INTRODUCTION: One of the most important responsibilities of governments and relief agencies after
each natural disaster is to provide the victims with emergency food items. This is an inevitable measure
to save the lives of injured and the ones who are rescued. This is due to inadequacy and unreliability
of household and local food supplies. Selection of the type of food is a concern of managers of the
response management programs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics
of emergency food items provided after natural disasters in Iran from the key informants’ viewpoints.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To conduct this qualitative study, we interviewed 26 experts in the
field of nutrition and response management in natural disasters through semi‑structured interviews.
Participants were selected using purposive sampling. The qualitative content analysis method was
further applied to analyze the collected data.
RESULTS: Analysis of interviews showed that the characteristics of emergency food provided after
natural disasters should be investigated in two categories: (1) nutritional considerations and (2)
functional characteristics. Nutritional considerations category comprised subcategories, namely,
formulas and special foods for emergencies, food diversity, nutritional needs of different groups,
food health and safety, and functional characteristics included subcategories of packaging, cultural
norms, and final price.
CONCLUSION: Managers, in relation to the emergency food items used after natural disasters,
should consider features including emergency formulas and food, food diversification, food health
and safety, packaging certificates, cultural norms, and final prices in response plans.


  1. Seyedin H, Ryan J, Keshtgar M. Disaster management planning
    for health organizations in a developing country. J Urban Plann
    Dev 2010;137:77‑81.
    2. FAO, IFAD, and WFP. The State of Food Insecurity in the
    World 2015: Meeting the 2015 International Hunger Targets:
    Taking Stock of Uneven Progress. Rome: Food and Agriculture
    Organization; 2015.
    3. Wien M, Sabaté J. Food selection criteria for disaster response
    planning in urban societies. Nutr J 2015;14:47.
    4. Marchione TJ. Foods provided through U.S. Government
    emergency food aid programs: Policies and customs
    governing their formulation, selection and distribution. J Nutr
    5. Golem DL, Byrd‑Bredbenner C. Emergency food supplies in food
    secure households. Prehosp Disaster Med 2015;30:359‑64.
    6. Nozue M, Ishikawa‑Takata K, Sarukura N, Sako K,
    Tsuboyama‑Kasaoka N. Stockpiles and food availability in
    feeding facilities after the great East Japan Earthquake. Asia Pac
    J Clin Nutr 2014;23:321‑30.
    7. Nakazawa T, Beppu S. Shifting from Emergency Food to Disaster
    Preparation Food to Help Disaster Survivors. 2012, Ministry
    of Education, Culture Sports, Science and Technology, Japan,
    NISTEP Science and Technology Foresight Center. p. 36‑54.
    8. Nekouie Moghadam M, Amiresmaieli M, Hassibi M, Doostan F,
    Khosravi S. Toward a better nutritional aiding in disasters:
    Relying on lessons learned during the bam Earthquake. Prehosp
    Disaster Med 2017;32:382‑6.
    9. Inoue T, Nakao A, Kuboyama K, Hashimoto A, Masutani M,
    Ueda T, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms and food/nutrition
    concerns after the great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011:
    Survey of evacuees in a temporary shelter. Prehosp Disaster Med
    10. Zahra M, Nadeem M, Hussain S, Qureshi M, Ahmad Din,
    Rashid F. Development and evaluation of nutri‑bars for internally
    displaced people in humanitarian emergencies. J Agric Res
    2014;52 (2); 217‑27
    11. Sheibani E, Dabbagh Moghaddam A, Sharifan A, Afshari Z.
    Linear programming: An alternative approach for developing
    formulations for emergency food products. J Sci Food Agric
    12. Brisske L, Lee S, Klein B, Cadwallader K. Development of
    a prototype high-energy, nutrient-dense food product for
    emergency relief. J Food Sci 2004;69:S361‑7.
    13. Scott‑Smith T. Beyond the ‘raw’ and the ‘cooked’: A history of
    fortified blended foods. Disasters 2015;39 Suppl 2:244‑60.
    14. Prevention Web. Basic Country Statistics and Indicators, Iran,
    Islamic Rep of Disaster & Risk Profile. 2014 [cited 2018 10 Aug];
    Available from:
  2. 15. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in
    nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve
    trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105‑12.
    16. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv
    Nurs 2008;62:107‑15.
    17. Streubert H, Rinaldi Carpenter D. Qualitative Research in Nursing
    Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. 5th ed. USA: Lippincott
    Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
    18. Kawashima S, Morita A, Higuchi T. Emergency stockpiling of
    food and drinking water in preparation for earthquakes: Evidence
    from a survey conducted in Sendai city, Japan. J Hunger Environ
    Nutr 2012;7:113‑21.