Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Community‑oriented Nursing Midwifery Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran

2 Department of Emergency Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

3 Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The biotechnology revolution and the emergence of new ways to change the genetic material of an
organism have led to an increased risk of biological wars. Coping strategies against these threats
is very important to improve the health of people. Therefore, due to the importance of this issue,
this study is aimed to review the scope of using biotechnology and genetic engineering in wars and
coping strategies in all over the world. In this review study, database includes of PubMed, Web of
Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Science Direct were searched. The search was limited to
reviewed articles in English published between 1990 and 2020. The primary search results generated
148 relevant references. After eliminating the duplicates and articles which were not related to
the review of the abstract, 11 references were identified for inclusion in this review. Based on the
results of these studies, the advances in genetic engineering can lead to the development of new
weapons for other types of conflict and war scenarios, secret operations, and sabotage activities.
Rapid developments in biotechnology and genetics have created environmental, ethical, political,
and social challenges for many communities. Increasing awareness and sensitivity, monitoring, and
building capacity for effective coping are essential. Biotechnology areas that will probably significantly
contribute to countering biological weapons include recognizing the human genome, strengthening
the immune system, identifying bacteria and viruses’ genome, equipment for biological identification,
new vaccines, new antibiotics, and anti‑viral drugs must be monitored.

Keywords

  1. Carus WS. The history of biological weapons use: What we know
    and what we don’t. Health Secur 2015;13:219‑55.
    2. Tumpey TM, Basler CF, Aguilar PV, Zeng H, Solórzano A,
    Swayne DE, et al. Characterization of the reconstructed 1918
    Spanish influenza pandemic virus. Science 2005;310:77‑80.
    3. Tucker JB. Strategies to Prevent Bioterrorism: Biosecurity
    Policies in the United States and Germany. Biosecurity: Origins,
    Transformations and Practices; 2009. p. 213.
    4. Nixdorff K., Brauburger J., Hahlbohm D. The Biotechnology
    Revolution: The Science and Applications. In: Dando M.R.,
    Pearson G.S., Toth T. (eds) Verification of the Biological and Toxin
    Weapons Convention. NATO ASI Series (Serie 1: Disarmament
    Technologies), vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. 2000. https://doi.
    org/10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3643-5_3.
    5. Jefferson C, Lentzos F, Marris C. Synthetic boilogy and biosecurity:
    Challenging the “myths”. Front Public Health 2014;2:115.
    6. Fraser CM, Dando MR. Genomics and future biological weapons:
    The need for preventive action by the biomedical community. Nat
    Genet 2001;29:253‑6.
    7. Williams JH, Phillips TD, Jolly PE, Stiles JK, Jolly CM, Aggarwal D.
    Human aflatoxicosis in developing countries: A review of
    toxicology, exposure, potential health consequences, and
    interventions. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:1106‑22.
    8. Peters KM. Behind in the biowar. Government Executive
    2001;33:27‑31.
    9. Greenwood D. Medical Microbiology, with Studentconsult Online
    Access, 18: Medical Microbiology: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
    10. Mukunda G, Oye KA, Mohr SC. What rough beast? Synthetic
    biology, uncertainty, and the future of biosecurity. Politics Life
    Sci 2009;28:2‑26.
    11. Klotz LC, Sylvester EJ. Breeding Bio Insecurity: How US
    Biodefense is Exporting Fear, Globalizing Risk, and Making us
    all Less Secure: University of Chicago Press; 2009.
  2. 12. van Aken J, Hammond E. Genetic engineering and biological
    weapons. New technologies, desires and threats from biological
    research. EMBO Rep 2003;4:S57‑60.
    13. Kolkman JA, Stemmer WP. Directed evolution of proteins by exon
    shuffling. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19:423‑8.
    14. Terwilliger JD, Göring HH. Gene mapping in the 20th and 21st
    centuries: Statistical methods, data analysis, and experimental
    design. Human biology 2009;81:663‑728.
    15. Relman DA. Bioterrorism‑preparing to fight the next war. N Engl
    J Med 2006;354:113‑5.
    16. Simon JD. Biological terrorism. Preparing to meet the threat.
    JAMA 1997;278:428‑30.
    17. Franz DR, Zajtchuk R. Biological terrorism: Understanding
    the threat, preparation, and medical response. Dis Mon
    2002;48:493‑564.
    18. Chameau JL, BallhausWF, Lin H. Emerging and Readily Available
    Technologies and National Security: A framework for Addressing
    Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues. Washington, DC: The National
    Academies Press.; 2014. https://doi.org/10.17226/18512.
    19. Sayler GS, Ripp S. Field applications of genetically engineered
    microorganisms for bioremediation processes. Curr Opin
    Biotechnol 2000;11:286‑9.
    20. van Aken J, Hammond E. Closing loopholes in the biological
    weapons convention. Med Confl Surviv 2002;18:194‑8.
    21. Glazer AN, Nikaido H. Microbial Biotechnology: Fundamentals
    of Applied Microbiology. Society for Industrial Microbiology,
    United States Cambridge University Press; 2007.
    22. Zilinskas RA. Biological Warfare: Modern Offense and Defense.
    Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2000.
    23. von Nussbaum F, Brands M, Hinzen B, Weigand S, Häbich D.
    Antibacterial natural products in medicinal chemistry‑exodus
    or revival? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2006;45:5072‑129.
    24. PearsonGS, editor New Scientific and Technological Developments
    of Relevance to the Fifth Review Conference. Review Conference
    Paper; 2001.
    25. Direko M. Genome Assembly of Next‑Generation Sequencing
    Data for the Oryx Bacillus: Species of the Mycobacterium
    tuberculosis Complex; 2011.
    26. Hauskeller C, editor. Human Genomics as Identity Politics.
    Award Paper for Young Scholar Conference. University of Exeter,
    Dubai. 2006.
    27. Block SM. Living Nightmares: Biological Threats Enabled
    by Molecular Biology. The New Terror: Facing the Threat of
    Biological and Chemical Weapons; 1999. p. 39‑75.
    28. ChoMK, Magnus D, CaplanAL, McGee D. Policy forum: Genetics.
    Ethical considerations in synthesizing a minimal genome. Science
    1999;286:2087, 2089‑90.
    29. Liu MA. DNA vaccines: An historical perspective and view to
    the future. Immunol Rev 2011;239:62‑84.
    30. Jorde LB, Watkins WS, Bamshad MJ, Dixon ME, Ricker CE,
    Seielstad MT, et al. The distribution of human genetic diversity:
    A comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal, and Y‑chromosome
    data. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:979‑88.
    31. Smart JK. History of chemical and biological warfare: An
    American perspective. In: Medical Aspects of Chemical and
    Biological Warfare. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon
    General; 1997. p. 9‑86.
    32. Cooper M. Pre‑empting emergence: The biological turn in the
    war on terror. Theory Culture Soc 2006;23:113‑35.
    33. Enderle J, Bronzino J. Introduction to biomedical engineering.
    Academic press; 2012.Pomerantsev AP, Staritsin NA, Mockov
    YuV, Marinin LI. Expression of cereolysine AB genes in Bacillus
    anthracis vaccine strain ensures protection against experimental
    hemolytic anthrax infection. Vaccine 1997;15:1846‑50.
    34. Cello J, Paul AV, Wimmer E. Chemical synthesis of poliovirus
    cDNA: Generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural
    template. Science 2002;297:1016‑8.
    35. Rosengard AM, Liu Y, Nie Z, Jimenez R. Variola virus immune
    evasion design: Expression of a highly efficient inhibitor of human
    complement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:8808‑13.
    36. Phillips CJ, Harrington AM, Yates TL, Simpson GL, Baker RJ.
    Global Disease Surveillance, Emergent Disease Preparedness, and
    National Security. Museum of Texas Tech University; Lubbock.
    2009. 12‑14.
    37. Kyrikou I, Briassoulis D. Biodegradation of agricultural plastic
    films: A critical review. J Polymers Environ 2007;15:125‑50.
    38. Després V, Huffman JA, Burrows SM, Hoose C, Safatov A,
    Buryak G, et al. Primary biological aerosol particles in
    the atmosphere: A review. Tellus B: Chem Phys Meteorol
    2012;64 (1):15598.
    39. Miller S, Selgelid MJ. Ethical and philosophical consideration of
    the dual‑use dilemma in the biological sciences. Sci Eng Ethics
    2007;13:523‑80.
    40. Carlson R. The changing economics of DNA synthesis. Nat
    Biotechnol 2009;27:1091‑4.
    41. Wright GD. Antibiotic resistance in the environment: A link to
    the clinic? Curr Opin Microbiol 2010;13:589‑94.
    42. Dennis C. The bugs of war. Nature 2001;411:232‑5.
    43. Hall, Victoria, Douglas Johnson, and Joseph Torresi. Travel and
    biologic therapy: travel-related infection risk, vaccine response
    and recommendations. Journal of travel medicine2018; 5.1.