Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Nursing Research Center, Razi Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Critical Care Nursing, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

4 Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

5 Modeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social media addiction (SMA) led to the formation of health‑threatening behaviors
that can have a negative impact on the quality of life and well‑being. Many factors can develop an
exaggerated tendency to use social media (SM), which can be prevented in most cases. This study
aimed to explore the reasons for SMA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted using content analysis. A
total of 18 SM addicted subjects were included through purposive sampling. Data were collected
through semi‑structured interviews and analyzed using the Lundman and Graneheim qualitative
content analysis method.
RESULTS: The main category of “weakness in acquiring life skills” was extracted with three themes: “problems
in socializing” (including communicating and escaping loneliness), “problems in resiliency” (including
devastation in harsh conditions and inability to recover oneself and “lack of problem‑solving skills”(including
weaknesses in analysis and decision making and disorganization in planning).
CONCLUSIONS: Weakness in life skills plays an important role in individuals’ addiction to SM and
formation of the health‑threatening behaviors. Since SMA can affect behavioral health, policymakers
must adopt educational and preventive programs to increase the knowledge and skills of individuals
in different societies in the modern world.

Keywords

1. Kizgin HJ, Dey BL, Rana NP. The impact of social media on
consumers’ acculturation and purchase intentions. Inf Syst Front
2018;20:503‑14.
2. Michael K. Facts and Figures: The Rise of Social Media Addiction;
2018. Available from: http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/
article/614696/facts‑figures‑rise‑social‑media‑ addiction/. [Last
accessed on 2020 Sep 21].
3. Masthi NR, Phaneendra M. A comparative study on social
media usage and health status among students studying in
pre‑university colleges of urban Bengaluru. Indian J Community
Med 2018;43:180.
4. Kapoor KK, Rana NP, Patil P, Patil P, Dwivedi Y, Nerur S.
Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Inf
Syst Front 2018;20:531‑58.
5. Leong LY, Ooi KB, Lee VH, Lee V, Hew Ju. A hybrid SEM‑neural
network analysis of social media addiction. Expert Syst Appl
2019;133:296‑316.
6. Griffiths MD, Demetrovics Z. Social networking addiction: An
overview of preliminary findings. J Behav Addict 2014:119‑41.
7. Andreassen CS, Pallesen S. Social network site addiction An
overview. Curr Pharm Des 2014;20:4053‑61.
8. Blackwell D, Leaman C, Tramposch R, Osborne C, Liss M.
Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing
out as predictors of social media use and addiction. Pers Individ
Dif 2017;116:69‑72.
9. Javed A, Yasir M, Majid A, Shah H.A, Islam E.U, Asad S, et al.
Evaluating the effects of social networking sites addiction, task
distraction, and self-management on nurses’ performance. J Adv
Nurs 2019;75:2820‑33.
10. Moqbel M, Kock N. Unveiling the dark side of social networking
sites: Personal and work‑related consequences of social
networking site addiction. Inf Manage 2018;55:109‑19.
11. Brooks S. Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and
well‑being? Comput Human Behav 2015;46:26‑37.
12. Sampasa‑Kanyinga H, Lewis RF. Frequent use of social
networking sites is associated with poor psychological functioning
among children and adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw
2015;18:380‑5.
13. Lebni JY, Toghroli R, Abbas J, NeJhaddadgar N, Salahshoor MR,
Mansourian M, et al. A study of internet addiction and its effects
on mental health: A study based on Iranian University Students.
J Educ Health Promot 2020;9:205.
14. Kheyri F, Azizifar A, Valizadeh R, Veisani Y, Aibod S, Cheraghi F,
et al. Investigation the relationship between internet dependence
with anxiety and educational performance of high school
students. J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:213.
15. Lin CY, Ganji M, Pontes HM, Imani V, Broström A, Griffiths MD,
et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Persian Internet Disorder
Scale among adolescents. J Behav Addict 2018;7:665‑75.
16. Speziale HS SH, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research in Nursing:
Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. wolters kluwer health:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
17. Mozafari S, Sepahvandi MA, Ghazanfari F. Study of the
relationship between Internet addiction with social Anxiety and
Loneliness among high school students in Yasuj. J Adv Pharm
Educ Res 2018;8:143.
18. Ryan T, Xenos S. Who uses Facebook? An investigation into
the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism,
loneliness, and Facebook usage. Comput Human Behav
2011;27:1658‑64.
19. Baker LR, Oswald DL. Shyness and online social networking
services. J Soc Pers Relat 2010;27:873‑89.
20. Gao F, Guo Z, Tian Y, Si Y, Wang P. Relationship between shyness
and generalized pathological internet use among Chinese school
students: The serial mediating roles of loneliness, depression, and
self‑Esteem. Front Psychol 2018;9:1822.
21. Guo Y, You X, Gu Y, Wu Gu, Xu Ch. A moderated mediation
model of the relationship between quality of social relationships
and internet addiction: Mediation by loneliness and moderation
by dispositional optimism. Curr Psychol 2018;39:1‑11.
22. Kim JH. Smartphone‑mediated communication vs. face‑to‑face
interaction: Two routes to social support and problematic use of
smartphone. Comput Human Behav 2017;67:282‑91.
23. Odacı H, Çelik ÇB. Who are problematic internet users? An
investigation of the correlations between problematic internet
use and shyness, loneliness, narcissism, aggression and
self‑perception. Comput Human Behav 2013;29:2382‑7.
24. Tian Y, Qin N, Cao S, Gao F. Reciprocal associations between
shyness, self‑esteem, loneliness, depression and Internet addiction
in Chinese adolescents. Addict Res Theory 2020:1‑3.
25. Bozoglan B, Demirer V, Sahin I. Loneliness, self‑esteem, and life
satisfaction as predictors of Internet addiction: A cross‑sectional
study among Turkish university students. Scand J Psychol
2013;54:313‑9.
26. Bilgin O, Taş İ. Effects of perceived social support and
psychological resilience on social media addiction among
university students. Univ J Educ Res 2018;6:751‑8.
27. Tas I. Association between depression, anxiety, stress, social
support, resilience and internet addiction: A structural equation
modelling. Malaysian Online J Educ Technol 2019;7:1‑10.
28. Koo HJ, Kwon JH. Risk and protective factors of Internet
addiction: A meta‑analysis of empirical studies in Korea. Yonsei
Med J 2014;55:1691‑711.
29. Robertson TW, Yan Z, Rapoza KA. Is resilience a protective factor
of internet addiction? Comput Human Behav 2018;78:255‑60.
30. Fadardi JS, Azad H, Nemati A. The relationship between
resilience, motivational structure, and substance use. Procedia
Soc Behav Sci 2010;5:1956‑60.
31. Cao Q, An J, Yang Y, Peng P, Xu S, Xu X, et al. Correlation among
psychological resilience, loneliness, and internet addiction among
left‑behind children in China: A cross‑sectional study. Curr
Psychol 2020;39:1‑8.
32. Ekinci B. The relationship between problematic Internet
entertainment use and problem solving skills among university
students. Int J Ment Health Addict 2014;12:607‑17.
33. Aftab R, Celik İ, Sarıçam H. Facebook addiction and social
emotional learning skills. Ozean J Soc Sci 2015;8:109‑20.
34. Sharma B. A study of resilience and social problem solving in
urban Indian adolescents. Int J Indian Psychol 2015;2:70‑85.