Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Nursing and Operating Room, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran

2 Department of Educational Science, Faculty of Nursing, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Academic procrastination is a complex phenomenon and a common behavior among
nursing students. Due to procrastinating behaviors, students cannot show their real performances in
learning processes. In order to stop this behavior, it is crucial to know the most common causes of
procrastination in the first place. The aim of this study was to identify a variety of different possible
factors influencing academic procrastination among nursing students.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: A qualitative study method with the content analysis approach was
conducted from October 2019 to March 2020. Participants were 67 nursing students and 8 nursing
educators from 3 nursing schools in Iran. Face‑to‑face semi‑structured interviews and focus group
discussions were used for data gathering. An inductive approach to content analysis was used for
data analysis.
RESULTS: Five categories and 24 subcategories emerged from the data analysis: “student‑related
factors,” “educator‑related factor,” “assignment characteristic‑related factors,” “institution‑related
factors,” and “nursing work‑related factors.”
CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that nursing students’ academic procrastination can
have a wide range of causes and a comprehensive effort is needed to address the problems. The
result of our study will be useful to nursing students, educators, and nursing administrators in relation
to what constitutes nursing students’ academic procrastination, as well as how nursing education
can play an effective role in decreasing tendency to procrastination.

Keywords

1. Steel P, Klingsieck KB. Academic procrastination: Psychological
antecedents revisited. Australian Psychol 2016;51:36‑46.
2. GoroshitM. Academic procrastination and academic performance:
An initial basis for intervention. J Prev Interv Community
2018;46:131‑42.
3. Jain AK, Data clustering: 50 years beyond K‑means. Pattern
Recognition Lett 2010;31:651‑66.
4. Gustavson DE, Miyake A. Academic procrastination and goal
accomplishment: A combined experimental and individual
differences investigation. Learn Individ Differ 2017;54:160‑72.
5. Abu NK, Saral DG. The reasons of academic procrastination
tendencies of education faculty students. Online J New Horizons
Educ 2016;6:165‑169.
6. Anderson C, Moxham L, Broadbent M. Providing support to
nursing students in the clinical environment: A nursing standard
requirement. Contemp Nurse 2016;52:636‑42.
7. Jafarian‑Amiri SR, Zabihi A, Qalehsari MQ. The challenges of
supporting nursing students in clinical education. J Educ Health
Promot 2020;9:216.
8. Yousefy A, Yazdannik A. Exploring the dominant discourse of
BSc nursing theory courses. Iran J Med Educ 2017;17:409‑19.
9. Ravanipour M, Bahreini M, Ravanipour M. Exploring nursing
students’ experience of peer learning in clinical practice. J Educ
Health Promot 2015;4:46.
10. BoardmanL. Building resilience in nursing students: Implementing
techniques to foster success. Int J Emerg Mental Health Human
Res 2016;18:1‑5.
11. Saeedi M, Parvizy S. Strategies to promote academic motivation
in nursing students: A qualitative study. J Educ Health Promot
2019;8:86.
12. Farzi S, Shahriari M, Farzi S. Exploring the challenges of clinical
education in nursing and strategies to improve it: A qualitative
study. J Educ Health Promot 2018;7:115.
13. Armat MR, Assarroudi A, Rad M, Sharifi H, Heydari A. Inductive
and deductive: Ambiguous labels in qualitative content analysis.
Qualitative Rep 2018;23:219‑21.
14. Winke P. Using focus groups to investigate study abroad theories
and practice. System 2017;71:73‑83.
15. Aldiabat KM, Le Navenec L. Data saturation: The mysterious step
in grounded theory methodology. Qualitative Rep 2018;23:245‑61.
16. Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging interpretations: But
is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic
evaluation. New Direct Evaluat 2007;114:11‑25.
17. Aeon B, Aguinis H. It’s about time: New perspectives and
insights on time management. Academy Manag Perspect
2017;31:309‑30.
18. Wolters CA, Won S, Hussain M. Examining the relations of time
management and procrastination within a model of self‑regulated
learning. Metacog Learning 2017;12:381‑99.
19. Yazdannik A, Yousefy A, Mohammadi S. Exploring the dominant
discourse of baccalaureate nursing education in Iran. Iran J Nurs
Midwifery Res 2017;22:19‑25.
20. Yazdannik A, Yekta ZP, Soltani A. Nursing professional identity:
An infant or one with Alzheimer. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res
2012;17:S178‑86.
21. Yazdannik AR, Yousefy AR, Mohammadi S, Arazighojogh T.
A glimpse in the challenges in Iranian academic nursing
education. Iran J Med Educ 2014;14:323‑31.
22. Grunschel C, Patrzek J, Fries S. Exploring reasons and
consequences of academic procrastination: An interview study.
Europ J Psychol Educ 2013;28:841‑61.
23. Grunschel C, Patrzek J, Fries S. Exploring reasons and
consequences of academic procrastination: An interview study.
Europ J Psychol Educ 2013;28:841‑61.
24. Oermann MH, Gaberson KB. Evaluation and Testing in Nursing
Education. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2016.
25. Jimenez C, Navia-Osorio PM, Diaz CV. Stress and health in novice
and experienced nursing students. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:442‑55.
26. Najimi A, Sharifirad G, Amini MM, Meftagh SD. Academic failure
and students’ viewpoint: The influence of individual, internal and
external organizational factors. J Educ Health Promot 2013;2:22.
27. Yousefy A, Reza Yazdannik A, Mohammadi S. Exploring the
environment of clinical baccalaureate nursing students’ education
in Iran; A qualitative descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today
2015;35:1295‑300.
28. Mohammadi S, Yazdan Nik AR, Yousefy A. A glimpse in the
challenges in Iranian academic nursing education. Iran J Med
Educ 2014;14:323‑31.
29. Samouei R, Fooladvand M, Janghorban S, Khorvash F.
Predicting the educational performance of Isfahan University
students of medical sciences based on their behaviour profile,
mental health and demographic characteristic. J Educ Health
Promot 2015;4:44.