Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The scientific Olympiad is an event that creates a competitive environment for
student groups of medical universities across the country to solve problems that can help improve
the health system. This study aims to explain the issues of the scientific Olympiad program of Iranian
medical students.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted using content analysis method, and the
data were collected through 21 semi‑structured, in‑depth interviews with experts from December
2018 to April 2020. Participants were selected using purposive sampling methods. Twenty‑one
students, domain leaders, question designers, Olympiad executive experts, and teachers (11 males
and 10 females) participated in the interviews. Data analysis was performed based on the steps of
Graneheim and Lundman’s method. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and subjected to a
qualitative analysis by MAXQDA 2018 software.
RESULTS: From the analysis of data, four themes, including inattention to context, inattention to
input, inattention to process, and inattention to output, emerged.
CONCLUSIONS: The scientific Olympiad can lead to interuniversity scientific exchanges and paves
the way for the promotion of education and evaluation of learners in medical universities, but if not
correctly implemented and the problems of previous periods are not solved, it will not help the health
system and can impose considerable costs on the system.

Keywords

1. Oliver M, Venville G. An Exploratory Case Study of Olympiad
Students’ Attitudes towards and Passion for Science.
2011;33(16):2295‑2322.
2. Yousefy A, Ghassemi G, Firouznia S. Motivation and academic
achievement in medical students. J Educ Health Promot 2012;1:4.
3. Adibi P, Hadadgar A, Hadizadeh F, Monajemi AR, Eftekhari H,
Haghjoo Javanmard S, et al. Implementation of the first
medical science Olympiad in Iran: A report. Iran J Med Educ
2011;10:1006‑17.
4. Monajemi A, Arabshahi KS, Soltani A, Arbabi F, Akbari R,
Custers E, et al. A comprehensive test of clinical reasoning for
medical students: An olympiad experience in Iran. J Educ Health
Promot 2012;1:10.
5. Kim KJ, Kee C. Gifted students’ academic performance in
medical school: A study of Olympiad winners. Teach Learn Med
2012;24:128‑32.
6. Nasrollahpour Shirvani S, Javanian M, Shabestani Monfared A,
Jahanian I. Assessment of the 4th Medical Students’ Scientific
Olympiad in Iran: Theory to action and viewpoints of the
participants. J Med Educ Dev 2014;9:45‑56.
7. Azami‑Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Nazavar R, Yaghoubi S,
Vahedi L. Perspectives of faculty members toward Iranian
National Olympiad for medical students: A qualitative study.
Russian Open Medical Journal. 2016;5(4):1‑6.
8. Dehnavieh R, Ferdosi M, Masoud E, Nourihekmat S. Science
Olympiad guiding ideas of elite students to the problems of
medical students experience in the management domain VII
Olympiad. Strides Dev Med Educ 2016;13:315‑7.
9. Abernathy TV, Vineyard RN. Academic competitions in
science: What are the rewards for students? A J Educ Strateg
2001;74:269‑76.
10. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE handbook of qualitative
research. Fifth ed. Salmon H, editor. London: SAGE Publications;
2018.
11. Hazrati H, Alizadeh M, Vahedi L. Medical sciences students’
viewpoints competing in the fourth Olympiad of Iranian universities of medical sciences – A qualitative study. Res Med
Educ 2015;7:41‑9.
12. Ghojazadeh M, Ali Hosseini M, Azami‑Aghdash S, Tahamtani T,
Fardid M, Yaghoubi S. Effective holding of scientific olympiads
for medical sciences students:  A qualitative study. Res
Dev Med Educ 2015;4:171‑6.
13. Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Scientific
Olympiads of Medical Students: Concepts and Definitions;
2018. 15 Jan. Available from: http://medolympiad.be
hdasht.gov.ir/page/%D9%85%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%87%D9
%8A%D9%85+%D9%88+%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%B1
%D9%8A%D9%81.
14. Monajemi A, Arabshahi KS, Soltani A, Arbabi F, Akbari R,
Custers E, et al. A comprehensive test of clinical reasoning for
medical students: An olympiad experience in Iran. J Educ Health
Promot 2012;1:10.
15. Clynes MP, Raftery SE. Feedback: An essential element of student
learning in clinical practice. Nurse Educ Pract 2008;8:405‑11.
16. Hadizadeh F, Yazdani S, Ferdosi M, Haghdoost AA, Rashidian A,
Hadadgar A, et al. The first national Olympiad on reasoning and
decision making in Health system management an experience
Report. Iran J Med Educ 2011;10:1018‑32.