Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Firouzeh Moeinzadeh
- . Sayed Hamid Reza Ayati 1
- . Bijan Iraj 2
- . Mojgan Mortazavi
- . Vajiheh Vafamehr 3
1 Ministry of Road and Urban Development Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center, Roads and Urban Development Office of Isfahan Province, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the past decade, the benefits of using portfolios, especially electronic
portfolios, were recognized. Due to the lack of using portfolios and especially electronic portfolio
in the clinical evaluations of internship training in medical schools of Iran, this study has designed,
implemented, and evaluated a comprehensive system for monitoring and evaluating the activities
of interns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a software development study in the three phases
of design, implementation, and evaluation. All stages of the project were carried out in the Isfahan
University of Medical Sciences during 2019–2020. The software design phase was performed using
the Rapid Application Development Methodology (RAD model). In the implementation phase, it
was used as a pilot study in the internal department of the medical school. System evaluation was
performed using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. Data were analyzed using
the content analysis for qualitative data and descriptive statistical analysis using the SPSS software
for quantitative data.
RESULTS: In the educational standards survey, in 10 items, the percentage of choosing “perfectly
fit” and “fit” was above 90% (high quality). In the technical standards questionnaire, out of 35 items
related to software technical quality, eight items were of acceptable quality and 27 of them were
partially acceptable. In the Student Satisfaction Questionnaire, in 9 items, interns’ satisfaction with the
system was high or very high, and in either case, there was little or no dissatisfaction or satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Positive educational effects can be used in all clinical settings if modification and
improvement of the software continues, with slight modifications.
Keywords
Aziz Mohammadi S. Creativity in clinical evaluation with
manual and performance record of medical interns and interns
in gynecology. J Educ Studies Nama 2013-2014;2:39-44.
2. Amiresmaili M, Nekoei Moghadam M, Moosazadeh M,
Pahlavan E. Challenges of general practice education in Iran:
A qualitative study. Strides Dev Med Educ 2013;9:118-31.
3. Buckley S, Coleman J, Davison I, Khan K S, Zamora J, Malick S.
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student
learning: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic
review. BEME Guide No. 11. Med Teach 2009;31:282-98.
4. Hall D. Professional development portfolios for teachers and
lecturers. J Service Educ 1992;18:81-6.
5. Saeed Al-Dhakerin M, Khorami Markani A, Khorami Markani M.
portfolio-based learning in nursing education. Adv Nurs
Midwifery 2009;19:43-9.
6. Challis M. AMEE medical education guide No. 11 (revised):
Portfolio-based learning and assessment in medical education.
Med Teach 1999;21:370-86.
7. Snadden D, Thomas M. The use of Portfolio learning in medical
education. Med Teach 1998;20:192-9.
8. Jalili M, baker Mafinejad M, Gandum Kar R, Mortaz Hijri S.
Principles and Methods of Assessment of Learners in Medical
Sciences. Tehran: Academy of Medical Sciences of the Islamic
Republic of Iran; 2017.
9. Seife AA. Assessment the Process and Product of Learning: Old
and New Methods. 1st ed. Tehran: Aghah (Persian); 2005.
10. Mokhtary M. Portfolio or work file. Future Sch 2010;1:18-21.
11. Butler PH. Review of the Literature on Portfolios and Electronic
Portfolios. New Zealand: eCDF ePortfolio Project; 2006 [Last cited
on 2020 Sep 01]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/239603203_A_Review_Of_The_Literature_On_
Portfolios_And_Electronic_Portfolios.
12. Hosseini V, July S, Eskandari M. Portfolio (descriptive glossary).
Iran J Med Educ 2010;10:196-7.
13. Tochel C, Haig A, Hesketh A, Cadzow A, Beggs K, Colthart L,
Peacock H. The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate
assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12. Med Teach
2009;31:299-318.
14. Sandars J, Cleary TJ. Self-regulation theory: Applications
to medical education: AMEE Guide No. 58. Med Teach
2011;33:875-86.
15. Driessen EW. Van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C.Wass V. Portfolios
in medical education: Why do they meet with mixed success? A
systematic review. Med Edu 2007;41:1224-33.
16. Mahmoudian S, Mearaji M. Portfolio and its role in the field of
medical education. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Medical Education
Development Horizon. 2016;7(1):39-45.
17. Tootoonchi M, Yamani N, Changiz T, Yousefy A. Research
priorities in medical education: A national study. Journal of
Research in Medical Sciences 2012;17(1): 83-91.
18. Imami Razavi S H. The quality of residency student education is
assessed electronically.[Last update on 2016 Nov 10, Last cited on
2020 Sep 01]. Available from: www.isna.ir/news/95080906489.
19. ISO/IEC 9126.[Updated: 2020 August 20, [Last update on 2020
Aug 20, Last cited on 2020 Sep 01]. Available from: https://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_9126.
20. Harper B D, Norman K L. Improving user Satisfaction: The
Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction Version 5.5. [Last
cited on 2020 Sep 01]. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.
org/ab14/30042d6b1a2f4b52087b74b0ddc0ea22cade.pdf.
21. Bazrafkan L, Shokrpour N, Yousefi A, Yamani N. Management
of stress and anxiety among PhD students during thesis writing:
A qualitative study. Health Care Manager 2016; 35(3):231-240.
22. Webb TP, Aprahamian C, Weigelt JA, Brasel KJ. The Surgical
Learning and Instructional Portfolio (SLIP) as a self-assessment
educational tool demonstrating practice-based learning. Curr
Surg 2006;63:444‑7.
)