Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Community Medicine, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
2 Department of Pharmacology, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Videoconferencing has been used as a modality of online medical teaching
by various institutes. There is a paucity of studies reporting the perception of medical teachers
toward teaching using teleconferencing platforms. The objective of this survey was to evaluate the
perception of medical teachers toward teaching using videoconferencing platforms such as Zoom
meet, Google meet, and Google classroom during the COVID‑19 pandemic. Our hypothesis was
teaching faculty would have a positive perception and experience toward web‑based teaching
modalities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical teachers of a medical college were invited to participate
in a prospective observational cross‑sectional online survey. The faculty demographic information,
perception, experience, and satisfaction were noted. Perception data were presented as proportion
and percentage.
RESULTS: 104 out of 160 faculty members participated in the study (response rate = 65%).
61 male (58.7%) and 43 female (41.3%) faculty members participated in the study. The mean age
of the faculty members was 39.3 years ± 13 (range: 27–69 years). Laptop (n = 73 [70.2%]) was the
most commonly used electronic device by the faculty members for conducting e‑teaching sessions
followed by smartphone (n = 25 [24%]). Google meet was the most preferred videoconference tool
for online teaching. Ninety‑six faculties (92.2%) were satisfied with the e‑teaching method adopted
by the institute. Eighty‑three faculty (79.8%) perceived the e‑teaching method to be very useful and
quite useful as a modality for teaching during the lockdown period.
CONCLUSIONS: The teaching faculties had a positive perception toward digital education methods
adopted for teaching of undergraduate medical students at our institute.
Keywords
COVID‑19: Time for a bold new strategy for medical education.
Med Educ Online 2020;25:1764741.
2. Liang ZC, Ooi SB, Wang W. Pandemics and their impact on
medical training: Lessons from Singapore. Acad Med 2020;Apr
17: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003441. Online ahead of print.
3. Seymour‑Walsh AE, Bell A, Weber A, Smith T. Adapting to a new
reality: COVID‑19 coronavirus and online education in the health
professions. Rural Remote Health 2020;20:6000.
4. Dedeilia A, Sotiropoulos MG, Hanrahan JG, Janga D, Dedeilias P,
Sideris M. Medical and surgical education challenges and
innovations in the COVID‑19 era: A systematic review. In Vivo
2020;34:1603‑11.
5. Gonzales‑Zamora JA, Alave J, De Lima‑Corvino DF, Fernandez A.
Videoconferences of Infectious Diseases: An educational tool that
transcends borders. A useful tool also for the current COVID‑19
pandemic. Infez Med 2020;28:135‑8.
6. Pradeep PV, Mishra A, Mohanty BN, Mohapatra KC, Agarwal G,
Mishra SK. Reinforcement of endocrine surgery training: Impact
of telemedicine technology in a developing country context.
World J Surg 2007;31:1665‑71.
7. Misra UK, Kalita J, Mishra SK, Yadav RK. Telemedicine for
distance education in neurology: Preliminary experience in India.
J Telemed Telecare 2004;10:363‑5.
8. Agrawal S, Maurya AK, Shrivastava K, Kumar S, Pant MC,
Mishra SK. Training the trainees in radiation oncology with
telemedicine as a tool in a developing country: A two‑year audit.
Int J Telemed Appl 2011;2011:230670.
9. Velavan J. “The refer less resolve more” initiative: A five‑year
experience from CMC Vellore, India. J Family Med Prim Care
2012;1:3‑6.
10. Shah D. Online education: Should we take it seriously? Climacteric
2016;19:3‑6.
11. Manjunatha N, Kumar CN, Math SB, Thirthalli J. Designing
and implementing an innovative digitally driven primary care
psychiatry program in India. Indian J Psychiatry 2018;60:236‑44.
12. Singh K, Srivastav S, Bhardwaj A, Dixit A, Misra S. Medical
education during the COVID‑19 pandemic: A single institution
experience. Indian Pediatr 2020;57:678‑9.
13. Patil RN, Almale BD, Patil M, Gujrathi A, Dhakne‑Palwe S,
Patil AR, et al. Attitudes and perceptions of medical
undergraduates towards mobile learning (M‑learning). J Clin
Diagn Res 2016;10:JC06‑JC10.
14. Peacock JG, Grande JP. An online app platform enhances
collaborative medical student group learning and classroom
management. Med Teach 2016;38:174‑80.
15. Liebert CA, Mazer L, Bereknyei Merrell S, Lin DT, Lau JN.
Student perceptions of a simulation‑based flipped classroom
for the surgery clerkship: A mixed‑methods study. Surgery
2016;160:591‑8.
16. Colenda CC, Applegate WB, Reifler BV, Blazer DG 2nd. COVID‑19:
Financial stress test for academic medical centers. Acad Med
2020;95:1143‑5.
17. Burki TK. COVID‑19: Consequences for higher education. Lancet
Oncol 2020;21:758.
18. Srinivasan DK. Medical students’ perceptions and an anatomy
teacher’s personal experience using an e‑learning platform
for tutorials during the COVID‑19 crisis. Anat Sci Educ
2020;13:318‑9.
19. Parthasarathi R, Gomes RM, Palanivelu PR, Senthilnathan P,
Rajapandian S, Venkatachalam R, et al. First virtual live conference
in healthcare. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017;27:722‑5.
20. Kanneganti A, Sia CH, Ashokka B, Ooi SB. Continuing medical
education during a pandemic: An academic institution’s
experience. Postgrad Med J 2020;96:384‑6.
21. Bhat R, Singh VK, Naik N, Kamath CR, Mulimani P, Kulkarni N.
COVID 2019 outbreak: The disappointment in Indian teachers.
Asian J Psychiatr 2020;50:102047.
22. Hammond D, Louca C, Leeves L, Rampes S. Undergraduate
medical education and Covid‑19: Engaged but abstract. Med
Educ Online 2020;25:1781379.
23. Machado RA, Bonan PR, Perez DEDC, Martelli DRB,
Martelli‑Júnior H. I am having trouble keeping up with
virtual teaching activities: Reflections in the COVID‑19 era.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2020;75:e1945.
24. Cameron MP, Ray R, Sabesan S. Physicians’ perceptions of
clinical supervision and educational support via videoconference:
A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2014;20:272‑81.
25. AllenM, SargeantJ, MannK, FlemingM, PremiJ. Videoconferencing
for practice‑based small‑group continuing medical education:
Feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and cost. J Contin Educ
Health Prof 2003; 23:38‑47.
)