Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India
3 Department of Orthopedics and Principal, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India
Abstract
BACKGROUND: COVID‑19 pandemic has forced medical colleges around the world to shift to
online teaching. There is hardly any evidence regarding such rapid transitions to online teaching,
especially from resource‑poor settings. We share our experience of developing an online teaching
program based on teachers’ and students’ feedback.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted during the COVID‑19
lockdown period in a public‑funded medical institute of India. Online feedback was obtained 3 weeks
after the beginning of emergency remote teaching. The responses by the students and teachers
shaped the final online teaching program which reinforced the perceived strengths and addressed
the weaknesses. Observations were made for the proportion of scheduled lectures delivered through
digital platform and students’ attendance in the 1st week and last week of the study period.
RESULTS: Feedback was obtained from 367 students and 56 teachers. Around three‑fourths of the
students (76.7%) and teachers (73.2%) were satisfied with online teaching. The themes generated for
benefits of online teaching were similar for both students and teachers, but the perceived challenges
differed. Students found online teaching more stressful, and teachers were apprehensive of the new
technology and lack of a controlled environment.
CONCLUSIONS: A rapid transition to development and implementation of an online teaching program
was found to be feasible and acceptable to the primary stakeholders. Not only the content but student
engagement and supportive environment for both students and teachers are essential requirements
in the context of an online undergraduate teaching program.
Keywords
From “black swan” to global challenges and opportunities.
Pulmonology 2020;26:117-8.
2. Sandhu P, de Wolf M. The impact of COVID-19 on the
undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Educ Online [serial
online] 2020;[cited 2020 Jul 23]25:1764740. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7269089/.
3. Ferrel MN, Ryan JJ. The impact of COVID-19 on medical
education. Cureus 2020;12:e7492.
4. Frehywot S, Vovides Y, Talib Z, Mikhail N, Ross H, Wohltjen H,
et al. E-learning in medical education in resource constrained
low- and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health 2013;11:4.
5. Leung K, Wu JT, Liu D, Leung GM. First-wave COVID-19 transmissibility and severity in China outside Hubei after control
measures, and second-wave scenario planning: A modelling
impact assessment. Lancet 2020;395:1382-93.
6. de Brouwer R, van Veldhuisen DJ, de Boer RA. Surviving the first
COVID-19 wave and learning lessons for the second [published
online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 21]. Eur J Heart Fail 2020; 10.1002/
ejhf. 1938. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
articles/PMC7323385/
7. Singh K, Srivastav S, Bhardwaj A, Dixit A, Misra S. Medical
education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A single institution
experience. Indian Pediatr[online ahead of print] 2020; [cited 2020
Jul 23] S097475591600174. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/32366728/
8. Hodges CB, Moore S, Lockee BB, Trust T, Bond MA. The
Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online
Learning. Educase Review [serial online] 2020; [cited 2020 Jul
23] Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/
the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-onlinelearning.
9. Tang B, Coret A, Qureshi A, Barron H, Ayala AP, Law M. Online
lectures in undergraduate medical education: Scoping Review.
JMIR Med Educ 2018;4:e11.
10. Merzouk A, Kurosinski P, Kostikas K. e-Learning for the medical
team: The present and future of ERS Learning Resources. Breathe
2014;10:296-304.
11. Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning
in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Med Educ Online [serial online] 2019;[cited 2020
Jul 23] 24:1666538. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/pmc/articles/PMC6758693/
12. Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: E-Learning in medical
education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach
2008;30:455-73.
13. Wilkinson TJ, Ali AN, Bell CJ, Carter FA, Frampton CM,
McKenzie JM. The impact of learning environment disruption
on medical student performance. Med Educ 2013;47:210-3.
14. Childs S, Blekinsopp E, Hall A, Walton G. Effective e-learning
for health professionals and students-barriers and solutions.
A systematic review of the literature Findings from the HeXL
project. Health Info Lib J 2005;22:20-32.
15. Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA
2020; 323:2131-2.
16. Chandra A, Nongkynrih B, Gupta SK. Role of smartphone
technology in medical education in India. Indian J Community
Fam Med 2019;5:103-7.
17. Nanda B, Bhattacharjee M, Chawla O, Rajajeyakumar M,
KapoorR. Incorporating e-learning as a tool for medical education
in India: Investigating student perspectives. J Educ Technol
Health Sci 2018;5:25-30.
18. Shahmoradi L, Changizi V, Mehraeen E, Bashiri A, Jannat B,
Hosseini M. The challenges of E-learning system: Higher
educational institutions perspective. J Educ Health Promot
2018;7:116.
19. Shih KC, Chan JC, Chen JY, Lai JS. Ophthalmic clinical skills
teaching in the time of COVID-19: A crisis and opportunity. Med
Educ 2020;54:663-4.
20. Mokaripour P, Shokrpour N, Bazrafkan L. Comparison of
readiness for e-learning from the perspective of students and
professors of Medical Sciences. J Educ Health Promot 2020;9:111.
21. Mosalanejad L, Ahmady S. Implementation of blended learning
with native systems: A new model for the application of new
technology in Iranian medical education. J Educ Health Promot
2019;8:239.
22. Kay D, Pasarica M. Using technology to increase student (and
faculty satisfaction with) engagement in medical education. Adv
Physiol Educ 2019;43:408‑13.
)