Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Fluminense Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology, Macaé (RJ), Brazi

Abstract

The objective was to identify the existing links between the conceptual proposal of the movement of
health-promoting universities (HPU) and the activities carried out to increase the health of workers
in higher education institutions. An integrative literature review was conducted in October 2020 in
the following databases: LILACS, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Web of Science, and CINAHL
and with the Boolean phrase citing, University AND “health promotion.” In the initial review, 5351
studies were found, and after removing the repetitions, applying the inclusion criteria, and making the
qualitative analysis, a sample of 9 articles was obtained. For the construction of the flowchart with the
representation of the eligibility and inclusion of the articles, the PRISMA model was use .The findings
were analyzed with the theoretical and conceptual support of the movement of HPU, which made it
possible to establish the construction of three categories, to quote: full provision of social, medical,
and health services; creating a favorable health environment on campus; and development of health
education actions. The movement of HPU is relevant to the contemporary world; however, initiatives
to incorporate these practices are still scarce, creating a gap between expectations and reality.

Keywords

  1. Malta DC, Reis AA, Jaime PC, Morais Neto OL, Silva MM,
    Akerman M. O SUS e a Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde:
    Perspectiva resultados, avanços e desafios em tempos de crise.
    Cien Saude Colet 2018;26:1799‑809.
    2. Bezerra IM, Sorpreso IC. Concepts and movements in health
    promotion to guide educational practices. J Hum Growth Dev
    2016;16:11‑20.
    3. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Política Nacional de Promoção da
    Saúde. Brasil: PNaPS. Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
    4. Faria MG, Gallasch CH, Martins AL. Inserção de graduandos
    de enfermagem em serviços de saúde do trabalhador: Relato de
    experiência. Cogitare Enferm 2016;21:1‑7.
    5. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Política Nacional de Saúde do
    Trabalhador e da Trabalhadora. Portaria no 1.823, de 23 de agosto
    de 2012. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde (BR); 2012.
    6. Oosterhuis H. Locura, salud mental y ciudadanía: Del
    individualismo posesivo al neoliberalismo. Rev Asoc Esp
    Neuropsiquiatr 2018;38:515‑45.
    7. D’Oliveira CA, Souza NV, Varella TC, Almeida PF. Working
    world’s configurations and the health‑disease process of nursing
    teachers. Rev Enferm UERJ 2020;28:e33123.
    8. Amim EF, Daher DV, Brito I da S, Galindo EG, Teizeira ER,
    Koopmans FF, et al. Lifestyle and health promotion of university
    professors. Res Soc Dev 2020;9:e593997507.
    9. Mello AL, Moysés ST, Moysés SJ. A universidade promotora de
    saúde e as mudanças na formação profissional. Interface Commun
    Heal Educ 2010;14:683‑92.
    10. Muñoz M, Cabieses B. Universidades y promoción de la salud:
    ¿Cómo alcanzar el punto de encuentro? Rev Panam Salud Pública
    2008;24:139‑46.
    11. Arroyo HV. El movimiento de universidades promotoras de la
    salud. Rev Bras Promoção Saúde 2018;31:1‑4.
    12. Mendes KD, Silveira RC de CP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa:
    Método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde
    e na enfermagem. Texto Context Enferm 2008;17:758‑64.
    13. Santos C, Pimenta C, Nobre M. A estratégia PICO para a
    construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Rev
    Latino Enferm 2007;15:1‑4.
    14. Zeng C, Lyu B, Deng S, Yu Y, Li N, Lin W, et al. Benefits of a
    three‑day bamboo forest therapy session on the physiological
    responses of university students. Int J Environ Res Public Health
    2020;17(9): 2‑17.
    15. Molina‑García J, Castillo I, Queralt A, Sallis JF. Bicycling to
    university: Evaluation of a bicycle‑sharing program in Spain.
    Health Promot Int 2015;30:350‑8.
    16. Butler CE, Clark BR, Burlis TL, Castillo JC, Racette SB. Physical
    activity for campus employees: A university worksite wellness
    program. J Phys Act Health 2015;12:470‑6.
    17. Bang KS, Lee I, Kim S, Lim CS, Joh HK, Park BJ, et al. The effects
    of a campus forest‑walking program on undergraduate and
    graduate students’ physical and psychological health. Int J
    Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(7): 1‑13
  2. 18. Pérez López IJ, Rivera García E, Delgado‑Fernández M.
    Improvement of healthy lifestyle habits in university students
    through a gamification approach. Nutr Hosp 2017;34(4):942‑51.
    19. Meier S, Stock C, Krämer A. The contribution of health discussion
    groups with students to campus health promotion. Health Promot
    Int 2007;22(1):28‑36.
    20. Levenson JC, Miller E, Hafer B, Reidell MF, Buysse DJ,
    Franzen PL. Pilot study of a sleep health promotion program for
    college students. Sleep Health 2016;2(2):167‑74.
    21. Eng JY, Moy FM, Bulgiba A. Impact of a workplace health
    promotion program on employees’ blood pressure in a public
    university. PLoS One 2016;11(2):e0148307.
    22. LeivaOA, Martínez SM, Celis‑Morales C. Effects of an intervention
    to reduce cardiovascular risk factors in university students. Rev
    Med Chil 2015;143(8):971‑8.
    23. Grimani A, Aboagye E, Kwak L. The effectiveness of workplace
    nutrition and physical activity interventions in improving
    productivity, work performance and workability: A systematic
    review. BMC Public Health 2019;19:1676.
    24. Audrey S, Procter S, Cooper AR. The contribution of walking to
    work to adult physical activity levels: A cross sectional study. Int
    J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014;11(37):1‑8.
    25. Jordi M. Estudio de percepciones sobre la salud en usuarios de la
    bicicleta como medio de transporte. Salud Colect 2017;13:307‑20.
    26. Jakovcevic A, Franco P, Visona Dalla Pozza M, Ledesma R.
    Percepción de los beneficios individuales del uso de la bicicleta
    compartida como modo de transporte. Suma Psicol 2016;23:33‑41.
    27. The Global Goals For Sustainable Development. Glob Goals.
    Available from: http://www.globalgoals.org/. [Last accessed
    on 2021 Feb 15].
    28. Sailer M, Hense JU, Mayr SK, Mandl H. How gamification
    motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game
    design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput Hum
    Behav 2017;69:371‑80.
    29. St‑Onge MP, Grandner MA, Brown D, Conroy MB, Jean‑Louis G,
    Coons M, et al. Sleep duration and quality: Impact on lifestyle
    behaviors and cardiometabolic health: A scientific statement from
    the American heart association. Circulation 2016;134(18):e367‑86.
    30. Babatunde EO. Influence of health education and healthy lifestyle
    on students’ academic achievement in biology in Nigeria. Univ
    J Educ Res 2017;5:1600‑5.
    31. Faria MG, Silveira EA, Cabral GR, SilvaRO, Daher DV, David HM.
    Worker’s health in the context of family health strategy:
    Integrative literature review. Esc Anna Nery 2020;24:1‑10.
    32. Madeira FB, Filgueira DA, Bosi ML, Nogueira JA. Lifestyle,
    habitus, and health promotion: Some approaches. Saude Soc
    2018;27:106‑15.
    33. Karimi N, Saadat‑Gharin S, Tol A, Sadeghi R, Yaseri M,
    Mohebbi B. A problem‑based learning health literacy intervention
    program on improving health‑promoting behaviors among girl
    students. J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:251.
    34. Suárez‑Reyes M, Serrano MM, Van den Broucke S. How do
    universities implement the Health Promoting University concept?
    Health Promot Int 2019;34:1014‑24.
    35. Newton J, Dooris M, Wills J. Healthy universities: An example of
    a whole‑system health‑promoting setting. Glob Health Promot
    2016;23:57‑65.