Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Magda Guimarães de Araujo Faria,
- . Renan Carvalho Fernandes
- . Cristiane Helena Gallasch
- . Luciana Valadão Vasconcelos Alves
Fluminense Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology, Macaé (RJ), Brazi
Abstract
The objective was to identify the existing links between the conceptual proposal of the movement of
health-promoting universities (HPU) and the activities carried out to increase the health of workers
in higher education institutions. An integrative literature review was conducted in October 2020 in
the following databases: LILACS, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Web of Science, and CINAHL
and with the Boolean phrase citing, University AND “health promotion.” In the initial review, 5351
studies were found, and after removing the repetitions, applying the inclusion criteria, and making the
qualitative analysis, a sample of 9 articles was obtained. For the construction of the flowchart with the
representation of the eligibility and inclusion of the articles, the PRISMA model was use .The findings
were analyzed with the theoretical and conceptual support of the movement of HPU, which made it
possible to establish the construction of three categories, to quote: full provision of social, medical,
and health services; creating a favorable health environment on campus; and development of health
education actions. The movement of HPU is relevant to the contemporary world; however, initiatives
to incorporate these practices are still scarce, creating a gap between expectations and reality.
Keywords
- Malta DC, Reis AA, Jaime PC, Morais Neto OL, Silva MM,
Akerman M. O SUS e a Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde:
Perspectiva resultados, avanços e desafios em tempos de crise.
Cien Saude Colet 2018;26:1799‑809.
2. Bezerra IM, Sorpreso IC. Concepts and movements in health
promotion to guide educational practices. J Hum Growth Dev
2016;16:11‑20.
3. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Política Nacional de Promoção da
Saúde. Brasil: PNaPS. Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
4. Faria MG, Gallasch CH, Martins AL. Inserção de graduandos
de enfermagem em serviços de saúde do trabalhador: Relato de
experiência. Cogitare Enferm 2016;21:1‑7.
5. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Política Nacional de Saúde do
Trabalhador e da Trabalhadora. Portaria no 1.823, de 23 de agosto
de 2012. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde (BR); 2012.
6. Oosterhuis H. Locura, salud mental y ciudadanía: Del
individualismo posesivo al neoliberalismo. Rev Asoc Esp
Neuropsiquiatr 2018;38:515‑45.
7. D’Oliveira CA, Souza NV, Varella TC, Almeida PF. Working
world’s configurations and the health‑disease process of nursing
teachers. Rev Enferm UERJ 2020;28:e33123.
8. Amim EF, Daher DV, Brito I da S, Galindo EG, Teizeira ER,
Koopmans FF, et al. Lifestyle and health promotion of university
professors. Res Soc Dev 2020;9:e593997507.
9. Mello AL, Moysés ST, Moysés SJ. A universidade promotora de
saúde e as mudanças na formação profissional. Interface Commun
Heal Educ 2010;14:683‑92.
10. Muñoz M, Cabieses B. Universidades y promoción de la salud:
¿Cómo alcanzar el punto de encuentro? Rev Panam Salud Pública
2008;24:139‑46.
11. Arroyo HV. El movimiento de universidades promotoras de la
salud. Rev Bras Promoção Saúde 2018;31:1‑4.
12. Mendes KD, Silveira RC de CP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa:
Método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde
e na enfermagem. Texto Context Enferm 2008;17:758‑64.
13. Santos C, Pimenta C, Nobre M. A estratégia PICO para a
construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Rev
Latino Enferm 2007;15:1‑4.
14. Zeng C, Lyu B, Deng S, Yu Y, Li N, Lin W, et al. Benefits of a
three‑day bamboo forest therapy session on the physiological
responses of university students. Int J Environ Res Public Health
2020;17(9): 2‑17.
15. Molina‑García J, Castillo I, Queralt A, Sallis JF. Bicycling to
university: Evaluation of a bicycle‑sharing program in Spain.
Health Promot Int 2015;30:350‑8.
16. Butler CE, Clark BR, Burlis TL, Castillo JC, Racette SB. Physical
activity for campus employees: A university worksite wellness
program. J Phys Act Health 2015;12:470‑6.
17. Bang KS, Lee I, Kim S, Lim CS, Joh HK, Park BJ, et al. The effects
of a campus forest‑walking program on undergraduate and
graduate students’ physical and psychological health. Int J
Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(7): 1‑13 - 18. Pérez López IJ, Rivera García E, Delgado‑Fernández M.
Improvement of healthy lifestyle habits in university students
through a gamification approach. Nutr Hosp 2017;34(4):942‑51.
19. Meier S, Stock C, Krämer A. The contribution of health discussion
groups with students to campus health promotion. Health Promot
Int 2007;22(1):28‑36.
20. Levenson JC, Miller E, Hafer B, Reidell MF, Buysse DJ,
Franzen PL. Pilot study of a sleep health promotion program for
college students. Sleep Health 2016;2(2):167‑74.
21. Eng JY, Moy FM, Bulgiba A. Impact of a workplace health
promotion program on employees’ blood pressure in a public
university. PLoS One 2016;11(2):e0148307.
22. LeivaOA, Martínez SM, Celis‑Morales C. Effects of an intervention
to reduce cardiovascular risk factors in university students. Rev
Med Chil 2015;143(8):971‑8.
23. Grimani A, Aboagye E, Kwak L. The effectiveness of workplace
nutrition and physical activity interventions in improving
productivity, work performance and workability: A systematic
review. BMC Public Health 2019;19:1676.
24. Audrey S, Procter S, Cooper AR. The contribution of walking to
work to adult physical activity levels: A cross sectional study. Int
J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014;11(37):1‑8.
25. Jordi M. Estudio de percepciones sobre la salud en usuarios de la
bicicleta como medio de transporte. Salud Colect 2017;13:307‑20.
26. Jakovcevic A, Franco P, Visona Dalla Pozza M, Ledesma R.
Percepción de los beneficios individuales del uso de la bicicleta
compartida como modo de transporte. Suma Psicol 2016;23:33‑41.
27. The Global Goals For Sustainable Development. Glob Goals.
Available from: http://www.globalgoals.org/. [Last accessed
on 2021 Feb 15].
28. Sailer M, Hense JU, Mayr SK, Mandl H. How gamification
motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game
design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput Hum
Behav 2017;69:371‑80.
29. St‑Onge MP, Grandner MA, Brown D, Conroy MB, Jean‑Louis G,
Coons M, et al. Sleep duration and quality: Impact on lifestyle
behaviors and cardiometabolic health: A scientific statement from
the American heart association. Circulation 2016;134(18):e367‑86.
30. Babatunde EO. Influence of health education and healthy lifestyle
on students’ academic achievement in biology in Nigeria. Univ
J Educ Res 2017;5:1600‑5.
31. Faria MG, Silveira EA, Cabral GR, SilvaRO, Daher DV, David HM.
Worker’s health in the context of family health strategy:
Integrative literature review. Esc Anna Nery 2020;24:1‑10.
32. Madeira FB, Filgueira DA, Bosi ML, Nogueira JA. Lifestyle,
habitus, and health promotion: Some approaches. Saude Soc
2018;27:106‑15.
33. Karimi N, Saadat‑Gharin S, Tol A, Sadeghi R, Yaseri M,
Mohebbi B. A problem‑based learning health literacy intervention
program on improving health‑promoting behaviors among girl
students. J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:251.
34. Suárez‑Reyes M, Serrano MM, Van den Broucke S. How do
universities implement the Health Promoting University concept?
Health Promot Int 2019;34:1014‑24.
35. Newton J, Dooris M, Wills J. Healthy universities: An example of
a whole‑system health‑promoting setting. Glob Health Promot
2016;23:57‑65.
)