Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, AIIMS Raipur, CG
2 Senior Resident, Department of Physiology, AIIMS Raipur, CG, India
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lockdown was imposed as a preventive measure for coronavirus disease
pandemic. Social media was the most common tool available for the masses, including the 1st
year medical students during the lockdown. The objectives of the present study were to determine
the extent of use of social media and the effects on mind‑body and social distancing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was mixed research conducted on 1st‑year medical students
using convenience sampling. The quantitative aspect of E‑survey was administered through Google
forms sent via E‑mail, and structured telephonic interview was conducted as a qualitative aspect on
randomly selected 10 students based on predecided interview questions. This study was reported
as per the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E‑Surveys. The analysis was performed using
percentages and paired t‑test with significance at P < 0.05, Chi‑square test with Yate’s correction.
Qualitative responses were analyzed using coding and categorization.
RESULTS: The response rate was 88%. Time spent on social media for >4 h increased from 1.1% to
47.72% during lockdown. Forty three (48.86%) of the students reported increased mood fluctuations.
The relation between mood fluctuations and time spent on social media of >4 h was significant
𝜒2 = 6.41 with P < 0.05. Average hours of sleep after using social media before lockdown increased
significantly from 6.68 h to 8.10 h during lockdown using paired t‑test, where “t” was 6.84. There
was a positive impact on communication with friends and family.
CONCLUSION: Due to the increased extent of use of social media during lockdown, negative
mind‑body effects have surfaced but emerged as boon in terms of communication .
Keywords
dictionary/Social%20media. [Last accessed on 2016 Jan 02].
2. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges
and oppurtunities of social media. Bus Horiz 2010;53:59‑68.
3. BaruahTD. Effectiveness of social media as a tool of communication
and its potential for technology enabled connections: A micro‑level
study. Int J Sci Res Public 2012;2:1‑10.
4. Das B, Sahoo JS. Social networking sites – A critical analysis of its
impact on personal and social life. Int J Bus Soc Sci 2011;2:222‑8.
5. World Health Organization. Mental Health and Psychosocial
Considerations during the COVID‑19 Outbreak. Available from:
https://www.who.int/docs/default‑source/coronaviruse/
mental‑health‑considerations.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 20].
6. Homes EA, O'Connor RC, Perry V H, Tracey I, Wessely S,
Arseneault L et al. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the
COVID‑19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science.
Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7(6):547‑560. Available from: https://doi.
org/10.1016/S2215‑0366(20)30168‑1. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 27].
7. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: The checklist
for reporting results of internet e-surveys (cherries). J Med Internet
Res 2004;6:e34.
8. Chou KL, Liang K, Sareen J. The association between social
isolation and DSM‑IV mood, anxiety, and substance use
disorders: Wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey
on Alcohol and Related Conditions. The J Clin Psychiatry
2011;72(11):1468‑1476.
9. Zhou X, Snoswell CL, Harding LE, Bambling M, Edirippulige S,
Bai X, et al. The role of telehealth in reducing the mental
health burden from COVID‑19. Telemedicine and e‑ Health
2020;26(4):377‑379.
10. BaruahTD. Effectiveness of social media as a tool of communication
and its potential for technology enabled connections: A micro‑level
study. Int J Sci Res Public 2012;2:1‑9.
11. Ayeni PT. Social media addiction: Symptoms and way forward.
TAJIIR 2019;I(IV) :XIX‑XLII.
12. Bhola RM, Mahakud GC. A qualitative analysis of social
networking usage. Int J Res Dev Health 2014;2:34‑44.
13. Tamir DI, Mitchell JP. Disclosing information about the self is
intrinsically rewarding. PNAS. 2012;109(21):8038‑8043.
14. Raj M, Bhattacherjee S, Mukherjee A. Usage of online social
networking sites among school students of Siliguri, West Bengal,
India. Indian J Psychol Med 2018;40(5):452‑457.
15. Grover S, Chakraborty K, Basu D. Pattern of Internet use among
professionals in India: Critical look at a surprising survey result.
Industrial Psychiatry Journal. 2010;19(2):94‑100.
16. Griffiths MD, Kuss D J . A d o l e s c e n t s o c i a l m e d i a
addiction (revisited). Educ Health 2017;35:59‑62.
17. Morahan‑Martin J, Schumaker P. Loneliness and social uses of
internet. Compu Human Behav 2003;19:659‑71.
18. Jordaan DB, Surujlal J. Social effects of mobile technology on
generation Y students. Mediterr J Soc Sci 2013;4:282‑8.
19. Thompson RR, Garfin DR, Holman EA, Silver RC. Distress, worry
and functioning following a global health crisis: A national study
of American’s responses to Ebola. Clin Psychol Sci 2017;5:513‑21.
20. ThompsonRR, Jones NM, Holman EA, SilverRC. Media exposure
to mass violence events can fuel a cycle of distress. Sci Adv.
2019;5:eaav3502.
21. Sathar S, Kumar SG, Kanungo S. Non‑scholastic qualities and their
association with social media usage among medical students in
Puducherry, India. Indian J Psychol Med 2020;42(2):136‑40.
22. SuraniZ, HiraniR, EliasA, QuisenberryL, VaronJ, Surani S, et al. Social
media usage among health care providers. BMC Res Notes 2017;10:654.
23. Czeisler CA. Perspective: Casting light on sleep deficiency.
Nature. 2013;497(7450):S13. doi: 10.1038/497S13a. Last accessed
on 30.5.2020
24. Santhi N, Thorne HC, van der Veen DR, Johnsen S, Mills SL,
Hommes V, et al. The spectral composition of evening light and
individual differences in the suppression of melatonin and delay
of sleep in humans. J Pineal Res 2012;53(1):47‑59.
25. Sugiyama T, Salmon J, Dunstan DW, Bauman AE, Owen N.
Neighborhood walkability and TV viewing time among
Australian adults. Am J Prev Med 2007;33(6):444‑449.
)