Journal of Education and Health Promotion

Effect of classmate as peer-led education on clinical performance: A mixed-method study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

. Roghayeh Mehdipour‑Rabori
. Monirsadat Nematollahi
. Behnaz Bagherian
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Achieving an excellent clinical education by nursing students is one of the primary
goals of any nursing school. Nursing educators try to use different methods to enhance clinical
skills. One of them is a peer‑led method that can be used in theoretical and clinical education. It is
developing as a suitable educational method to promote health. This study assessed the effect of
classmates as peer‑led education on the clinical performance of nursing students.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted using a mixed‑method approach and
a sequential explanatory design. In the quantitative phase, a quasi‑experimental study with a
two‑group pre‑ and post‑test design was conducted. The sample of this phase consisted of 70 nursing
students (35 persons in each group) who were selected through random convenience sampling. The
intervention group participated in a peer‑led education program. The control group received routine
training. The members of both groups completed the clinical performance checklist before, and after
the intervention, The collected data were analyzed using SPSS V21 software using descriptive and
inferential statistics. In the qualitative phase, the researchers interviewed 18 undergraduate students
using semi‑structured in‑depth and face‑to‑face approaches. These participants were selected by
purposive sampling method. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. MAX DATA
10 was used to categorize the data. To establish the reliability and validity of findings, Graneheim,
and Landman’s criteria were considered
RESULTS: In the quantitative phase of the study, the results showed that the mean score of clinical
performance was not statistically significant between the control and intervention groups before the
intervention (P > 0.05). At the same time, it was significantly different after the intervention (P < 0.05),
implying that the peer‑led education of the intervention group significantly increased compared to that
of the control. The main theme was “learning based on friendship,” which included two categories,
namely “deep learning” and “learn in the shadow of relaxing.”
CONCLUSION: Classmate as peer‑led education could increase the ability of nursing students in
clinical performance, and was able to enhance deep learning among them.


Keywords

Clinical performance
clinical setting
nursing students
peer‑led education
  1. Sheikhbardsiri H, Sheikhasadi H, Mahani SA, Mohamadi MMD.
    Emotional intelligence and learning strategies of postgraduate
    students at Kerman University of Medical Sciences in the
    southeast of Iran. J Educ Health Promot 2020;9:66.
    2. Esmaeili M, Cheraghi MA, Salsali M, Ghiyasvandian S. Nursing
    students’ expectations regarding effective clinical education:
    A qualitative study. Int J Nurs Pract 2014;20:460‑7.
    3. HosseinKM, FatemehD, FatemehOS, KatriVJ, TaherehB. Teaching
    style in clinical nursing education: A qualitative study of Iranian
    nursing teachers’ experiences. Nurse Educ Pract 2010;10:8‑12.
    4. Sheikhbardsiri H, Mousavi SH, Doustmohammadi MM,
    Karimi M, Salahi S. The effect of educational workshop on
    emergency department nurses’ self‑efficacy in patient training.
    J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:136.
    5. Somayeh M, Dehghani M, Mozaffari F, Ghasemnegad SM,
    Hakimi H, Samaneh B. The effectiveness of E‑learning in learning:
    A review of the literature. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2016;5:86‑91.
    6. Kiani S, Bayanzadeh M, Tavallaee M, Hogg RS. The Iranian
    population is graying: Are we ready? Arch Iran Med 2010;13:333‑9.
  2. 7. Baraz S, Memarian R, Vanaki Z. Learning challenges of nursing
    students in clinical environments: A qualitative study in Iran.
    J Educ Health Promot 2015;4:52.
    8. Parvan K, Hosseini FA, Bagherian S. The relationship between
    nursing instructors’ clinical teaching behaviors and nursing
    students’ learning in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in
    2016. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2018;31:32‑8.
    9. Heshmati‑Nabavi F, Vanaki Z. Professional approach: The key
    feature of effective clinical educator in Iran. Nurse Educ Today
    2010;30:163‑8.
    10. Rafati F, Rafati S, Khoshnood Z. Perceived stress among
    Iranian nursing students in a clinical learning environment:
    A cross‑sectional study. Adv Med Educ Practice 2020;11:485‑91.
    11. Morris D, Turnbull P. Using student nurses as teachers in inquirybased learning. J Adv Nurs 2004;45:136‑44.
    12. Hamrin V, Weycer A, Pachler M, Fournier D. Evaluation of
    peer‑led support groups for graduate nursing students. J Nurs
    Educ 2006;45:39‑43.
    13. Stone R, Cooper S, Cant R. The value of peer learning in
    undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review. ISRN
    Nurs 2013;2013:1‑19.
    14. Lorthios‑Guilledroit A, Richard L, Filiatrault J. Factors associated
    with the implementation of community‑based peer‑led health
    promotion programs: A scoping review. Eval Program Plann
    2018;68:19‑33.
    15. Nelwati , Abdullah KL, Chan CM. A systematic review
    of qualitative studies exploring peer learning experiences
    of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today
    2018;71:185‑92.
    16. Sciacca J. Student peer health education: A powerful yet
    inexpensive helping strategy. Peer Facilitator Quarterl 1987;5:4‑6.
    17. Riley R, Green J, Willis S, Soden E, Rushby C, Postle D, et al.
    Foundations for a healthy future. J Child Health Care 1998;2:20‑4.
    18. Evans DJ, Cuffe T. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: An approach
    for deeper learning. Anato Sci Educ 2009;2:227‑33.
    19. Secomb J. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in
    clinical education. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:703‑16.
    20. Lynn P. Taylor’s Clinical Nursing Skills: A Nursing Process
    Approach.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams &
    Wilkins; 2018.
    21. Lynn P, Lebon M. Skills Checklists for Taylor’s Clinical Nursing
    Skills. Vol. 3. Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaLippincott Williams &
    Wilkins; 2011. p. 372‑86.
    22. Aliakbari F, Parvin N, Heidari M, Haghani F. Learning theories
    application in nursing education. J Educ Health Promot 2015;4:2.
    23. Tornwall J. Peer assessment practices in nurse education: An
    integrative review. Nurse Educ Today 2018;71:266‑75.
    24. Jarvill M, Jenkins S, Akman O, Astroth KS, Pohl C, Jacobs PJ. Effect
    of simulation on nursing students’ medication administration
    competence. Clin Simul Nurs 2018;14:3‑7.
    25. Jarvill M, Kelly S, Krebs H. Effect of expert role modeling on skill
    performance in simulation. Clin Simulat Nurs 2018;24:25‑9.
    26. Priftanji D, Cawley MJ, Finn LA, Hollands JM, Morel DW,
    Siemianowski LA, et al. Performance and retention of basic life
    support skills improve with a peer‑led training program. Curr
    Pharm Teach Learn 2018;10:744‑9.
    27. Vaughan B, Moore K, Kleinbaum A. Near‑peer teaching
    in osteopathy clinical education. Int J Osteopathic Med
    2017;25:42‑5.
    28. Kim SS, De Gagne JC. Instructor‑led vs. peer‑led debriefing in
    preoperative care simulation using standardized patients. Nurse
    Educ Today 2018;71:34‑9.
    29. Pålsson Y, Mårtensson G, Swenne CL, Ädel E, Engström M.
    A peer learning intervention for nursing students in clinical
    practice education: A quasi‑experimental study. Nurse Educ
    Today 2017;51:81‑7.
    30. Zhang J, Cui Q. Collaborative Learning in Higher Nursing
    Education: A Systematic Review. J Prof Nurs 2018;34:378‑88.
    31. White PR, Pesis‑Katz I. Peer‑led team learning model in a
    graduate‑level nursing course. J Nurs Educ 2012;51:471‑5.
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Volume 11, Issue 2
February 2021
Pages 1-6

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us