Journal of Education and Health Promotion

Survey of social health insurance structure in selected countries; providing framework for basic health insurance in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

. Effat Mohammadi
. Ahmad Reza Raissi 1
. Mohsen Barooni 2
. Massoud Ferdoosi 1
. Mojtaba Nuhi

1 Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan

2 Department of Health Management and Economics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: Health system reforms are the most strategic issue that has
been seriously considered in healthcare systems in order to reduce costs and increase
efficiency and effectiveness. The costs of health system finance in our country, lack of universal
coverage in health insurance, and related issues necessitate reforms in our health system
financing. The aim of this research was to prepare a structure of framework for social health
insurance in Iran and conducting a comparative study in selected countries with social health
insurance. Materials and Methods: This comparative descriptive study was conducted in three
phases. The first phase of the study examined the structure of health social insurance in four
countries – Germany, South Korea, Egypt, and Australia. The second phase was to develop
an initial model, which was designed to determine the shared and distinguishing points of the
investigated structures, for health insurance in Iran. The third phase was to validate the final
research model. The developed model by the Delphi method was given to 20 professionals in
financing of the health system, health economics and management of healthcare services. Their
comments were collected in two stages and its validity was confirmed. Findings: The study of
the structure of health insurance in the selected countries shows that health social insurance in
different countries have different structures. Based on the findings of the present study, the current
situation of the health system, and the conducted surveys, the following framework is suitable for
the health social insurance system in Iran. The Health Social Insurance Organization has a unique
service by having five funds of governmental employees, companies and NGOs, self‑insured,
villagers, and others, which serves as a nongovernmental organization under the supervision
of public law and by decision‑ and policy‑making of the Health Insurance Supreme Council.
Membership in this organization is based on the nationality or residence, which the insured by
paying the insurance premiums within 6-10%
of their income and employment status, are
entitled to use the services. Providing services
to the insured are performed by indirect
forms. Payments to the service providers for
the fee of inpatient and outpatient services
are conservative and the related diagnostic
groups system. Conclusions: Paying
attention to the importance of modification of
the fragmented health insurance system and
financing the country’s healthcare can reduce
much of the failure of the health system,
including the access of the public to health
services. The countries according to the degree of development, governmental, and private insurance companies and existing rules must
use the appropriate structure, comprehensive approach to the structure, and financing of the
health social insurance on the investigated basis and careful attention to the intersections and
differentiation. Studied structures, using them in the proposed approach and taking advantages
of the perspectives of different beneficiaries about discussed topics can be important and efficient
in order to achieve the goals of the health social insurance.

Keywords

Health insurance
health insurance structure
insurance
selected countries
1. Marks RC, Rich MW. “Health Care Reform: A Guide to Equity and
Efficiency.” Translated: Ahmadv AR, and Tofighy.Sh Ibn Sina
Largest Publisher of Scientific and Cultural Institutions. Printing.
SUMMER 1384. p. 297‑71.
2. Normand C, Weber A. Social health insurance: A guidebook for
planning. Geneva: World Health Organization/ILO; 1994.
3. Knaul, F, Arreola‑Ornelas H, Mendez, O, Martínez A. Fair health
financing and catastrophic health expenditures: Potential impact of
the coverage extension of the popular health insurance in Mexico.
Salud publica de Mexico 47 (2005):S54‑65.
4. Social health insurance: Acontribution to the international developmentpolicy debate universal systems of social protection. Federal Ministry
for Economic Cooperation and Development. November 2005.
5. Carrin G, James C. Social health insurance: Key factors affecting the
transition towards universal coverage. Int Soc Secur Rev 2005;58:45‑64.
6. Chisholm D, Evans DB. Improving health system efficiency as a
means of moving towards universal coverage. World Health Report
2010 background paper, no. 28 Available from: http://www.who.
int/healthsystems/topics/financing/healthreport/whr_background/
en. [Last accessed on 2012 Jan 04].
7. Principles of Management and the Social Security system. Social
Security Research Institute, Tehran, 1376.
8. WHO, 2000: World Health Report 2000‑Health Systems: Improving
Performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
9. Mohammed A, Hosseini R. The health insurance system. Jihad in
Tehran University Publications. Printing. Winter 1389.
10. Hajizadeh, Mohammad. Healthy economy. Tehran, Publishing
community, 1378. p. 95‑83.
11. The World Health Organization reported in 2000. Why health systems
are important? Translation: Ahmadvand AR, Ibn Sina largest publisher
of scientific and cultural institutions. Printing. SUMMER 1382. p. 50‑33.
12. WHO. Management effectiveness program (Map Guide). Geneva:
WHO; 2001.
13. Schut FT, Gress S, Wasem J. Consumer price sensitivity and social
health insurer choice in Germany and the Netherlands. Int J Health
Care Finance Econ 2003;3:117‑38.
14. Mishra R. Social security in South Korea and Singapore: Explaining
the differences. Soc Policy Adm 2007;29:228‑40.
15. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2011. Australia’s welfare 2011.
Australia’s welfare series no. 10.Cat. no. AUS 142. Canberra: AIHW.
16. Yip W, Berman P. Targeted health insurance in a low income country
and its impact on access and equity in access: Egypt’s school health
insurance. Health Econ 2001;10:207‑20.
17. Bärnighausen T, Sauerborn R. One hundred and eighteen years
of the German health insurance system: Are there any lessons for
middle‑and low‑income countries? Soc Sci Med 2002;54:1559‑87.
18. Gericke, Christian A. Financing health care in Egypt: Current issues
and options for reform. No. 2004/5. Diskussions papiere Technische
Universität Berlin, Fakultät Wirtschaft und Management, 2004.
19. Jacobs, Rowena, and Maria Goddard. “Social health insurance
systems in European countries.” The role of the insurer in the health
care system: A comparative study of four European countries,
University of York, 2000.
20. Kwon S. Thirty years of national health insurance in South Korea:
Lessons for achieving universal health care coverage. Health Policy
Plann 2009;24:63‑71.
21. Smith J. Tax expenditures and public health financing in Australia.
Australia Institute, 2000.
22. Busse R, Dixon A, Healy J, Krasnik A, Leon S, Paris V, et al. health
care system in eight countries: Trends and challenges: European
observatory on health care system. Available from: http://www.
cimca.ca/i/m/Health-Care-Systems-in-Eight-Countries-EuropeanObservatory.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Nov 09].
23. Lee J, Health care reform in South Korea: Success or failure? Am
JPublic Health. 2003;93:48-51.
24. Busse R, Riesberg A, Health care system in transition (Germany).
Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_
file/0018/80703/E85472.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Nov 09].
25. Kwon S, Healthcare financing reform and the new single payer
system in the Republic of Korea: Social solidarity or efficiency?
International Social Security Review. 2003;56:75-94.
26. Ali Zadeh Murad, Overview of the health and welfare. Special Issue
on Medical Insurance, 2002;6:45.
27. Schwefel D, Health financing in Egypt. National health accounts,
health insurance and family health funds. Lessons for the Health
Sector Modernisation Programme of Syria. Available from: http://
detlef-schwefel.de/232-Schwefel-Egypt.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014
Nov 09].
28. World Health Organization, The world health report 2003: Shaping
the future. World Health Organization, 2003. Available from: http://
www.who.int/whr/2003/en/whr03_en.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014
Nov 09].
29. Evans D, Etienne C, Health systems financing and the path to
universal coverage. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2010;
88:402.
30. Wagstaff A, Social Health Insurance vs. Tax-Financed Health
Systems–Evidence from the OECD. Available from: http://elibrary.
worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-4821. [Last accessed on
2014 Nov 09].
31. Ekman B, Liem NT, Duc HA, Axelson H. Health insurance reform in
Vietnam: A review of recent developments and future challenges.
Health Policy Plan. 2008;23:252-63.
32. Najjar A, Process packets of information systems in selected
countries, and provide complementary health insurance services
model for Iran. Journal of Health Information Management.
2006;3:0.
33. Moghadasi H, The health insurance system problems and urgency
of corrective approach. Journal of Management, 2001;14:0.
34. Eqbali M, Health insurance structure. Journal of national Medical
council of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2001.
35. Cheng TM, Taiwan’s new national health insurance program:
Genesis and experience so far. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22:61-76
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Volume 4, Issue 5
Autumn 2014
Pages 1-9

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us