Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: Information literacy is the basis for lifelong learning. Information literacy skills,
especially for student in an environment that is full of information from multiple technologies
are being developed is equally important. Information literacy is a set of cognitive and
practical skills and like any other science, proper training is needed, and standard‑based
education is definitely better and evaluation would be easier. This study aimed to determine
the impact of information literacy training course on information literacy skills of Isfahan
University of Medical Sciences students based on ACRL standard in 2012. Materials and
Methods: The study method is semi‑experience with two group design (with pre‑test and
post‑test) and applied. The data collection toll was a questionnaire assessing student’s
information literacy that developed by Davarpanah and Siamak and validity was confirmed
by professional librarians and reliability as measured by Cronbach’s alpha, was 0.83. The
sample consisted of 50 undergraduate students from Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
that by random sampling method was perch in both case and control groups. Before and
after the training (once a week), a questionnaire was distributed between the two groups.
This training was held in a classroom equipped with computers with internet access and in
addition to training using brochures and librarian presentation, interactive methods such as
discussion and exercises were used. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software
and two level of descriptive (mean and SD) and inferential statistics (t‑test and t‑paired).
Results: The results showed that the students’ information literacy scores before the training
was lower than average, so that in the control group was 32.96 and in the case group was
33.24; while information literacy scores in the case group significantly increased after the
training (46.68). Also, the effect of education, respectively had a greater impact on the ability
to access information (the second standard), ethics and legal use of information (the third
standard), effective use of information (the fourth standard), critically evaluate information and
its sources (the fifth standard). Conclusion: This study showed that the training was effective
on enhancing students’ information literacy skills as the greatest impact was on increasing the ability to access information. Due to low mean score information literacy in the context of
object recognition, there is a need for more training in this area.
Keywords
Association of college and research libraries. Translator A. Gasemi.
Chicago, Illinois: Association of college and research libraries, 2002.
Available from: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/standards.
pdf. [Last cited on 2012 Feb 10].
2. Farajpahlou A, Moradimoghadam H. Reviewing the comments of
faculty members of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz toward
their required educational plans about information search as one
of the aspects of information literacy and providing guidelines for
quality of holding these courses. Mashhad: Organization of libraries,
museum and documentation of Astan‑e‑Qodse Razavi Publication;
2004.
3. Siamak M, AlipurNodushan KH, Khaleghi N. Assessment of
Information Literacy Qom University of Medical Sciences Students.
J Qom Univ Med Sci 2013;2:23‑30. Available from: http://www.
journal.muq.ac.ir/index.php/qumsj/article/download/601/299.
[Last cited on 2013 Jul 10].
4. Nazari M. Information Literacy. Tehran: Iranian Research Institute
for Information Science and Technologhy; 2001.
5. Parirokh M. Information literacy education: Concepts and
Applications. Tehran: Ketabdar Publication; 2007.
6. Khaleghi N, Siamak M. Teaching information literacy skills. Tehran:
Ketabdar, Ghom University Publication; 2010.
7. Davarpanah M, Ghasemi A, Siamak M. Information literacy
assessment of students. Tehran: Dabizesh; 2008.
8. Parirokh M. Measuring effectiveness of information literacy
workshops. Stud Educ Psychol 2010;2:79‑104.
9. Tabibnia V. Evaluation of information literacy of graduate students
in Alameh Tabatabaei University. Tehran: Sience and Research Unit
of Islamic Azad University; 2007.
10. Beyranvand A, Beyranvand A, Afsharzanjani A, Bakhshi B,
Mohamadnejadghani A, Beyranvand B. Evaluation of Performance
Impact Library Training Programs on ability to use the library in
graduate students in Sience and Research Unit of Islamic Azad
University. Book Q 2009;81:6‑22.
11. Hassanzadeh R, Asadi M. Evaluating of Training Information
Literacy on Academic Performance Student. J Educ Sci
2010;11:1‑18. Available from: http://edu.bojnourdiau.ac.ir/
page/download‑KlHHI1tGP_A.artdl. [Last cited on 2010 Jul 15].
Pandpazir M, Cheshmehsohrabi M. Evaluating of information literacy
in Kermanshah University of Medical Science graduate students
based on the six great skill Eisenberg and Brkvyytz Research
Information Science Public Libraries 2010;2010;16:115‑37.
12. Parirokh M, Arastou Pour SH, Naderi M. Effectiveness information
literacy Workshop for graduate students in Context‑oriented
approach. J Libr Inf Sci 2011;1:201‑24.
13. Mohamadi F, Shakeri S, Akbari‑Darian S. Assess the Level
of Information Literacy of Visitors to the National Library and
Archives of Iran Based on ACRL Standards. J Syst Inf Serv
2013;1:85‑96. Available from: http://www.sid.ir/Fa/ViewPaperFa.
asp?ID=185285andvarStr=1. [Last cited on 2013 Jul 10].
14. Flaspohler MR. Information literacy program assessment: One small
collage takes the big plung. Ref Serv Rev 2003;31:129‑40.
15. Wema E, Hepworth M. An evaluation of an information literacy
training initiative at the university of Dar es Salaam. J Inf Lit
2007;1:1‑12. Available from: http://www.jil.lbore.ac.uk/ojc.
[Last cited on 2013 May 19].
16. Jorosi BN. Information literacy skills In Community Junior
Secondary schools in Gabrone, Botswana. Information Deelopment
2008;2:123‑34. Available from: http://www.idv.sagepub.com/
content/24/2. [Last cited on 2012 Jul 29].
17. Boruff JT, Thomas A. Integrating Evidence‑Based practice and
information literacy skills in teaching physical and occupational
therapy students. Health Inf Libr J 2011;28:264‑72. Available from:
http://www.apps.webofknowledge.com/summary.do? [Last cited
on 2012 Aug 12].
18. Lalor JG, Clarke M, Sheaf G. An evaluation of the effectiveness
of information literacy training for undergraduate midwives to
improve their ability to access evidence for practice. Nurse Educ
Pract 2012;12:269‑72.
19. Kratochvil J. Evaluation of e‑learning course, Information Literacy,
for medical students. Electron Libr 2013;31:55‑69. Available
from: http://www.apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.
do?product=UAandsearch. [Last cited on 2012 May 19].
20. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). Information
Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago:
American Library Association; 2013. Available from: http://www.
ala.org. [Last cited on 2013 May 19].
21. Soudbakhsh L, Nik‑kar M. Influence of training information literacy
skills on information seeking behavior. Book Q 2005;16:53‑8.
22. American Library Association. Presidential Committee on
Information Literacy. Final Report. Chicago: American Library
Association ALA; 1989.
23. Pandpazir M, Cheshmehsohrabi M. Evaluating of information literacy
in Kermanshah University of Medical Science graduate students
based on the six great skill Eisenberg and Brkvyytz. Res Inf Sci
Public Libr 2010;16:115‑37.
)