Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Scientometrics, Vice Chancellery of Technology and Research,

2 Department of Nursing, Isa‑bne‑Maryam Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

3 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, and Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: The aim of this research was to study the pathology of Isfahan University
of Medical Sciences based on Weisbord six box model and to find its relation with mental
health. Materials and Methods: The research method followed was a descriptive survey.
The statistical society consisted of all staffs of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
consisting of professors in the year 2012 (personnel of deputy of treatment, deputy of training,
cultural‑student deputy, supporting deputy, deputy of food and drugs, health deputy, and deputy
of research). The number of subjects in the mentioned society was 1647, sample size was 332
Based on Cochrane’s formula. They were selected by random sampling method in proportion
with the statistical society.The measurement instruments included organizational pathology
questionnaire (ODQ) with 35 questions and the questionnaire of mental health standard [General
Health Questionnaire (GHQ)] with 28 questions. The validity of the questionnaires obtained
from reviews by faculties and experts, and the reliability of the questionnaire assessed
through Cronbach’s coefficient were 0.86, 0.85, and 0.76, respectively.To analyze data, the
statistical methods such as single‑variance t‑test, regression analysis, correlation coefficient,
Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) were used.
Findings: The findings of research demonstrated that the organizational damage based on
six box model was seen only in the reward component at the Isfahan University of Medical
Sciences. Mental health of persons in the sample group of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
was in the suitable status. There was a meaningful and positive interrelation between mental
health and attitude toward the organizational damages in the dimensions of communications,
useful merchandises, and attitude to change. However, no meaningful interrelation was seen
between aims, structure, leadership, and reward and mental health. There was no meaningful
difference between the averages of staffs’ attitude about their mental health per the demographic
properties. Conclusions: The results show that there was a meaningful and positive interrelation
between mental health and attitude toward the organizational damages in the dimensions of
communications, useful merchandises, and attitude to change. Therefore, managers should
focus on all parts of the organization and the pathology strengths and weaknesses in these areas.

Keywords

1. Farhangi AA. Study on knowing the statues of regional water
company of Kerman, presenting some of problem and solving it for
increased productivity moderator: Applied research center. Iran:
Tehran Management College; 2000.
2. Harrison MI. Diagnosing organizations: Methods, model and
process. California, USA: Sage Publication; 1998.
3. Rahimi H. Organizational health, the educational development
magazine in Medical Science, Isfahan, Spring and Summer 2011.
No. 6, p: 10‑9.
4. Pour R, Naderi S, The model of organizational pathology, First
publication. Isfahan: Kankash Publication; 2009.
5. WHOQOL Group. WHOQOLBREF introduction, adminstration,
scoring and generic version of assessment. Geneva: World Health
organization; 1996.
6. Fouladvand KH. Relationship between organizational climate and
employees’ mental health at Ilam city hospitals. Iran: Journal of
Ilam Medical Science University, 2007;15:44‑50. [In Persian].
7. Parsa Moin K, Nazem F. The relationship between entrepreneurship
and organizational commitment and job burnout. Journal New
Industrial/Organizational Psychology, 2010;3:7‑17.
8. De Raeve L, Kant I, Jansen NW, Vasse RM, van den Brandt PA.
Changes in mental health as a predictor of changes in working time
arrangements and occupational mobility: Results from a prospective
cohort study. J Psychosom Res 2009;66:137‑45.9. Mirzaee Ahranjani H. Analysis of factors affecting social conscience
and discipline in the organization, Tehran, Qazvin Islamic Azad
University, 2004.
10. Zali MR. The organizational diagnosis in a Public Company. J Exec
Manage 2008;21:28‑45.
11. Pour H. Study on pathology of Department of Physical Education
in Kohgiluie and Boier Ahmad, MA thesis, management of physical
Education. Iran: Tehran Payam Nour University; 2010.
12. Najafi MI. Organizational Pathedology of youth sports General
Administration, MA thesis. Iran: Khorasgan Islamic Azad University; 2010.
13. Mohammadi R. The relationship between the role of management,
job satisfaction and mental pressure factors and nurses’ mental
health of private and state hospitals in Tehran, phd Thesis. Iran:
Tehran Islamic Azad University; 1997.
14. Ramezani Nejhad R, Hemati Nejhad M, Mohammadi M. Study
on occupational stress factors of Physical Education and Sport
teachers, Olympic magazine, Spring 2004, No 25, p: 27‑36.
15. Dortaj F. Study on inner organizational and inter‑personal factors
on managers’ and employees’ mental health statues of Martyrs and
Veterans Affairs, Educational Psychology Journal (Psychology and
Educational), winter 2007, No. 3, p: 104‑29.
16. Savadkuhi A, Manuchehr K, Hassan S. The relationship between
neurotic aspects and employees’ mental health from their points,
the new industrial/organizational psychology magazine, Second
years, Garmsar, 2011, No. 6, p: 53‑63.
17. Orayzi H, Darmi Z. Study on mental health and migraine headaches
among employees due to imbalance effort‑reward model. Iran job
health magazine, Tehran, 2012, Volume 9, No 1. P: 17‑29.
18. Banihashemian K, Golestan Jahromi F, Ghanbari P, Kashani N,
Sharafi M. The relationship between managers’ leadership style and
its impact on mental health and job satisfaction of employees in Shiraz
University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Journal of Tehran University of
Medical Sciences (Health Payavard); 2011;5:32‑40.
19. Mardani M, Sharaki A, Ebrahimi E. Mental health nurses of Tehran
Medical Sciences, Iran Journal of Nursing, the twenty‑fourth year,
Tehran, 2011, No. 74.Volume 24, p: 28‑35.
20. Fugue DR, Kurpius DJ. Conceptual models in organizational
consultation. J Couns Dev 1993;71:607‑18.
21. Bissel CM. Organizational diagnosis: The role of contagion groups.
Int J Organ Anal 2008;16:7‑17.
22. Stoetzer U, Ahlberg G, Johansson G, Bergman P, Hallsten L,
Forsell Y, et al. Problematic interpersonal relationships at work and
depression: A Swedish prospective cohort study. J Occup Health
2009;51:144‑51.
23. Vicic V. Organizational changes according to Burke‑ Litwin model
in the head nurses system of management in health care and social
welfare institution. Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2009.
24. Burke WW, Litwin GH. A causal model of organizational performance
and change. J Manag 1992;18:523‑45.
25. Enache R. Forms organizational pathology among the teashing
staff in prahova conty, The New Educational Review, 2010,
Vol. 20, No. 1.
26. Safikhani K. Comparison among share of organizational health of
physical activity levels among Isfahan Al Zahra education Center
employees, MA thesis. Iran: Isfahan University; 2011.
27. Weisbord MR. Organizational diagnosis, six place to look for trouble
with or without a theory. J Group Organ Manage 1976;1:430‑47.
28. Goldberg D. The detection of psychiatric illness by Questionnaire.
London: Oxford University Press; 1979.
29. Mirsepasi N. Strategic human resource management and labor
relations. 30th ed. Tehran: Amir Press; 2011.
30. Goli Garmkhanei R, Soltanian N. Study on employees’ mental health
in martyr Foundation in Kermanshah. Kermanshah, 2004.
31. Cole D. Quality of working life indictor in canadian occupational
medicine. Health Care Organ 2005;2:54‑9.