Authors
Abstract
Background: Nonscholastic abilities among medical students are an important area of concern
for the health professionals. Very few studies had been conducted in the past with regard to it.
Objective: This study was an exploratory study aimed to assess the nonscholastic abilities among
medical students in a medical institution in coastal South India. Materials and Methods: This
study assessed three broad domains of nonscholastic abilities namely personal qualities,
interpersonal activities, and communication skills among 106 medical students using a
structured questionnaire (27 questions with a total score of 27). The data were analyzed by
independent t‑test and linear regression model. Results: About 41.5% (44) of the subjects were
males and 52.8% (56) of them were belonged to 18–19 years age group. Overall mean score of
nonscholastic abilities was found to be 19.40 (standard deviation = 3.27). Percentile distribution
of subjects is at score 17 (25th percentile), 20 (50th percentile), and 22 (75th percentile). Mean
personal quality domain score was found to be proportionately lesser than other domains of
nonscholastic abilities. Nonscholastic ability score was significantly associated with marks
obtained in the previous examination (P = 0.006). However, linear regression analysis revealed
that the presence of family problems (P = 0.005) and alcohol use (P = 0.026) were associated
with low nonscholastic ability score among medical students. Conclusion: Nonscholastic
abilities are still a required need in medical student’s career. Further analytical studies will help
in identifying the in‑depth evaluation of factors associated with it.
Keywords
qualities in selection of medical radiation science students. J Nucl
Med Technol 2005;33:180‑5.
2. Finlay SE, Fawzy M. Becoming a doctor. Med Humanit
2001;27:90‑2.
3. Albanese MA, Snow MH, Skochelak SE, Huggett KN, Farrell PM.
Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad
Med 2003;78:313‑21.
4. West CP, Shanafelt TD. The influence of personal and environmental
factors on professionalism in medical education. BMC Med Educ
2007;7:29.
5. Rabow MW, Wrubel J, Remen RN. Promise of professionalism:
Personal mission statements among a national cohort of medical
students. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:336‑42.
6. Hurwitz S, Kelly B, Powis D, Smyth R, Lewin T. The desirable qualities
of future doctors – A study of medical student perceptions. Med
Teach 2013;35:e1332‑9.
7. Kumar S, Z Zayapragassarazan Multi‑Source Feedback (360 Degree
Feedback) for Assessing Non‑Scholastic Abilities. Available from:
http://www.jipmer.edu/September%202010/2%20Articles.pdf [Last
accessed on 2013 Jan 25].
8. Association of Indian Universities, Research Cell. Monograph on
Internal Assessment for Universities. New Delhi: 1977.
9. Adam J, Bore M, McKendree J, Munro D, Powis D. Can personal
qualities of medical students predict in‑course examination success
and professional behaviour? An exploratory prospective cohort
study. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:69.
10. Aomatsu M, Otani T, Tanaka A, Ban N, van Dalen J. Medical students’
and residents’ conceptual structure of empathy: A qualitative study.
Educ Health (Abingdon) 2013;26:4‑8.
11. Marambe KN, Edussuriya DH, Dayaratne KM. Attitudes of Sri Lankan
medical students toward learning communication skills. Educ Health
(Abingdon) 2012;25:165‑71.
12. Shankar RP, Dubey AK, Mishra P, Deshpande VY, Chandrasekhar TS,
Shivananda PG. Student attitudes towards communication
skills training in a medical college in Western Nepal. Educ
Health (Abingdon) 2006;19:71‑84.
13. Medical Council of India. Regulations on Graduate Medical
Education, Medical Council of India, Dwarka, New Delhi; 1997.
Available from: http://www.mciindia.org/Rules‑and‑Regulation/
GME_REGULATIONS.pdf [Last accessed on 2013 Jan 20].
)