Authors
- . Hooman Shariatzadeh 1
- . Mohsen Motaleb 2
- . Farhad Soltani 3
- . Farid Najd Mazhar 3
- . Ali Behmanesh 4
- . Meysam Fathi 3
- . Mohsen Barkam 5
- . Seyed Jafar Ehsanzadeh 6
- Roshanak Shams . 3
1 1 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Trauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,
4 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Education Development Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,
5 Department of Hand Surgery, Seyedallshohada Hospital, Kerman, Iran
6 English Language Department, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis to assess the number
of articles published by Iranian researchers in the field of hand and microsurgery over the last four
decades.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online search was conducted using 685 keywords in the abstract/
title sections of articles, including carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist fractures, nerve injury and repair,
skin flap and graft in the hand, congenital disorders in the hand and forearm, tumor in the hand
and wrist, and infection in the hand and wrist. From February 1976 to May 2021, EndNote software
version 8.1 was used to search articles in PubMed and Scopus databases. Articles in which at least
one of the authors was affiliated with Iran were chosen. The name of the original institution, field of
study, total number of publications, type of study, collaboration rate of Iranian hand surgeons for
each year, and annual sharing of Iranian articles in journals with the highest cite scores in the field
of hand and microsurgery were all examined in the present study.
RESULTS: The total number of publications in the field of hand and microsurgery was 632 (an average
of 11 papers per year). Most of the Iranian hand and microsurgery papers were from the capital
city, Tehran (38.09%). There was an increasing trend in the number of publications over the years,
most which were about carpal tunnel syndrome (21.5%), tendon (9.8%), and nerve (9.6%). In total,
59.6% were descriptive articles, whereas the proportion of clinical trials was relatively small (22.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Iranian hand microsurgeons have continued to increase their scientific output in
hand microsurgery and related fields over the last 40 years. The quality of Iranian hand microsurgeons’
scientific output, both within and outside their discipline, has greatly improved; however, they still
have a long way to go before becoming a hub of science.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study without control group.
Keywords
Value for US Public Health Practice, Policy, and Research.
American Public Health Association; 2003.
2. Malekzadeh R, Mokri A, Azarmina P. Medical Science
andResearch in Iran. 2001.
3. Van Raan A. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance
assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific
developments. TATuP-Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung
in Theorie und Praxis 2003;12:20-9.
4. Yazdani K, Nejat S, Rahimi‑Movaghar A, Ghalichee L, Khalili M.
Scientometrics: Review of concepts, applications, and indicators.
Iranian J Epidemiol 2015;10:78‑88.
5. Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. Scientometrics in a changing research
landscape: Bibliometrics has become an integral part of research
quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research.
EMBO Rep 2014;15:1228‑32.
6. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer
program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84:523‑38.
7. Afshar A, Dianat A, Lahiji FA. Hand surgery in Iran. J Hand Surg
Eur Vol 2019;44:551‑2.
8. Fajardo M, Kim SH, Szabo RM. Incidence of carpal tunnel release:
Trends and implications within the United States ambulatory care
setting. J Hand Surg. 2012;37:1599‑605.
9. Lavyne MH, Bell WO. Simple decompression and occasional
microsurgical epineurolysis under local anesthesia as treatment
for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurosurgery 1982;11:6‑11.
10. Farzam R, Deilami M, Jalili S, Kamali K. Comparison of
anesthesia results between Wide Awake Local Anesthesia no
Tourniquet (WALANT) and Forearm Tourniquet Bier Block in
hand surgeries: A randomized clinical trial. Arch Bone Joint Surg
2021;9:116.
11. Nazari R, Ahmadzadeh R, Mohammadi S, Kiasari JR. Effects of
hand massage on anxiety in patients undergoing ophthalmology
surgery using local anesthesia. J Caring Sci 2012;1:129‑34.
12. Zhou X, Xing C, Xin L, Hu H, Li L, Fang J, et al. Scientific
publications in urology and nephrology journals from China:
A 10‑year analysis. Can Urol Assoc J 2012;6:102‑6.
13. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Case‑control studies: Research in reverse.
Lancet 2002;359:431‑4.
14. Lopez J, Susarla SM, Swanson EW, Calotta N, Lifchez SD. The
association of the H‑index and academic rank among full‑time
academic hand surgeons affiliated with fellowship programs.
J Hand Surg Am 2015;40:1434‑41.
15. Jerome JTJ, Mercier F, Mudgal CS, Arenas‑Prat J, Vinagre G,
Goorens CK, et al. Perspectives and consensus among international
orthopaedic surgeons during initial and mid‑lockdown phases of
coronavirus disease. J Hand Microsurg 2020;12:135‑62.
16. Najd Mazhar F, Jafari D, Taraz H, Mirzaei A. Treatment of dorsal
fracture‑dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint using
the shotgun approach. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018;43:499‑505.
17. Namazi H, Ghaedi E, Karimi MT. Comparison of biomechanicalresults about the effect of three surgery methods in decompression
of lunate bone. J Wrist Surg 2021;10:296‑302.
18. Akhondzadeh S, Ebadifar A, Eftekhari MB, Falahat K. Medical
science and research in Iran. Arch Iranian Med 2017;20:665‑72.
19. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of
PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: Strengths
and weaknesses. FASEB J 2008;22:338‑42.
20. Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW. Comparisons of citations
in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles
published in general medical journals. JAMA 2009;302:1092‑6.
)