Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Training of health profession students in telehealth is important to ensure proper 
implementation for healthcare delivery. This prospective study aimed to analyze the effects of 
didactic and experiential learning on knowledge, confidence, and attitudes of telehealth among 
health profession students (Survey 1). The perceptions of a mixed model telehealth platform were 
also considered among these students and community clients (Survey 2).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quasi‑experimental repeated‑measure study was conducted on 153 
university health profession students in physician assistant, physical therapy, occupational therapy, 
and nursing (NR) across the 2020–2021 academic year. Survey 1 was administered to students 
pre/postdidactic telehealth training and at two sequential points within two semesters of telehealth 
experiential learning. Survey 2 was distributed among students and a pool of 19 community clients 
at 4 time points across the experience. Survey data were analyzed using R software.
RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in telehealth knowledge, confidence, and attitudes 
among all student disciplines after the didactic module with marginal means ranging 3.313/5–4.318/5 
for pretest to posttest 1. Improvement continued through experiential learning with marginal means 
ranging 4.170/5–4.369/5 in posttest 3. There was also a significant student and client approval 
of the telehealth platform with a student mean high of 3.962/5 ± 0.527 and client mean high of 
4.727/5 ± 0.238.
CONCLUSION: A didactic training module combined with experiential learning is effective for health 
profession students’ improvement in perception, knowledge, and attitudes toward telehealth. Health 
profession students and community clients approve a mixed model telehealth platform.

Keywords

  1. Telehealth: Technology Meets Health Care. Mayo 
    Clinic. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/
    healthy‑lifestyle/consumer‑health/in‑depth/telehealth/
    art‑20044878#:~:text=Telehealth%20is%20the%20use%20of, 
    and%20manage%20your%20health%20care. [Last accessed on 
    2021 Feb 07].
    2. Burch S, Gray D, Sharp J. The power and potential of telehealth: 
    What health systems should know. Healthc Financ Manage 
    2017;71:46‑9.
    3. Kichloo A, Albosta M, Dettloff K, Wani F, El‑Amir Z, Singh J, et al. 
    Telemedicine, the current COVID‑19 pandemic and the future: 
    A narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. 
    Fam Med Community Health 2020;8:e000530.
    4. Serper M, Volk ML. Current and future applications of 
    telemedicine to optimize the delivery of care in chronic liver 
    disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:157‑61.e8.
    5. Bennell KL, Lawford BJ, Metcalf B, Mackenzie D, Russell T, 
    van den Berg M, et al. Physiotherapists and patients report 
    positive experiences overall with telehealth during the COVID‑19 
    pandemic: A mixed‑methods study. J Physiother 2021;67:201‑9.
    6. Shachar C, Engel J, Elwyn G. Implications for telehealth in a 
    postpandemic future: Regulatory and privacy Issues. JAMA 
    2020;323:2375‑6.
    7. Mann DM, Chen J, Chunara R, Testa PA, Nov O. COVID‑19 
    transforms health care through telemedicine: Evidence from the 
    field. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020;27:1132‑5.
    8. Boardman D, Wilhite JA, Adams J, et al. Telemedicine 
    Training in the COVID Era: Revamping a Routine OSCE to 
    Prepare Medicine Residents for Virtual Care. J Med Educ 
    Curric Dev. 2021;8:23821205211024076. Published 2021 Jun 
    16. doi:10.1177/23821205211024076. PMCID: PMC8212360. 
    PMID: HYPERLINK "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
    pubmed/34189270" 34189270.
    9. Alexander GC, Tajanlangit M, Heyward J, Mansour O, Qato DM, 
    Stafford RS. Use and content of primary care office‑based vs. 
    telemedicine care visits during the COVID‑19 pandemic in the 
    US. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2021476.
    10. Lieneck C, Garvey J, Collins C, Graham D, Loving C, Pearson R. 
    Rapid telehealth implementation during the COVID‑19 global 
    pandemic: A rapid review. Healthcare (Basel) 2020;8:517.
    11. JonasCE, DurningSJ, ZebrowskiC, CiminoF. An Interdisciplinary, 
    multi‑institution telehealth course for third‑year medical students. 
    Acad Med 2019;94:833‑7.
    12. Galpin K, Sikka N, King SL, Horvath KA, Shipman SA. Expert 
    consensus: Telehealth skills for healthcare professionals. Telemed 
    E Health 2021;27:820‑4.
    13. Edirippulige S, Armfield NR. Education and training to support 
    the use of clinical telehealth: A review of the literature. J Telemed 
    Telecare 2017;23:273‑82.
    14. Telehealth Etiquette: Being the Third Wheel. South Central 
    Telehealth Resource Center, University of Arkansas 
    Medical Sciences. Available from: https://learntelehealth.
    org/video‑items/etiquette‑third‑wheel/. [Last accessed on 
    2021 Aug 16].
    15. Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core Competencies 
    for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: 2016 Update. 
    Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2016.
    16. North S, Beck B, Liveris M, Vega A, Boyington N, Stockwell L,et al.
    Students’ knowledge and self‑perceptions regarding integrative 
    medicine and health following training in first‑year graduate PA, 
    PT, and OT programs. J Allied Health 2018;47:e91‑5.
    17. Vega A, North S, Ruggeri B, Beck B, Liveris M, Castro A,
    et al. A cross‑cultural integrative health interprofessional 
    practice model using innovative case study and academic 
    Hispanic community partnership approaches. Cogent Med 
    2020;7 (1)1767347. [doi: 10.1080/2331205X.2020.1767347].
    18. Leveille W, Brandes J, Boos K, Vega A, Beck B, Ruggeri B, et al. 
    The Positive impact of occupational therapy involvement in 
    interprofessional education. J Occup Ther Educ 2020;4 (4) Article 
    5. doi: 10.26681/jote.2020.040405
    19. Phillips TA, Munn AC, George TP. Assessing the impact of 
    telehealth objective structured clinical examinations in graduate 
    nursing education. Nurse Educ 2020;45:169‑72.
    20. Donelan K, Barreto EA, Sossong S, Michael C, Estrada JJ, 
    Cohen AB, et al. Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth 
    for patient follow‑up care. Am J Manag Care 2019;25:40‑4.
    21. MorganD, KosteniukJ, StewartN, O’ConnellME, KarunanayakeC, 
    Beever R. The telehealth satisfaction scale (TeSS): Reliability, 
    validity, and satisfaction with telehealth in rural memory clinic 
    population. Telemed J E Health 2014;20:997‑1003.
    22. Parmanto B, Lewis AN Jr., Graham KM, Bertolet MH. 
    Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). 
    Int J Telerehabil 2016;8:3‑10.
    23. Serwe KM. The provider’s experience of delivering an 
    education‑based wellness program via telehealth. Int J Telerehabil 
    2018;10:73‑80.
    24. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, D’Agostino 
    McGowan L, Francois R, et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open 
    Source Softw 2019;4 (43):1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss. 
    01686
    25. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical 
    Computing. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical 
    Computing; 2019. Available from: https://www.R‑project.org/. 
    Last Accessed 11 October 2021.
    26. Grice GR, Thomason AR, Meny LM, Pinelli NR, Martello JL, 
    Zorek JA. Intentional interprofessional experiential education. 
    Am J Pharm Educ 2018;82:6502.
    27. Kallail KJ, Shaw P, Hughes T, Berardo B. Enriching Medical 
    Student Learning Experiences. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Jan 
    23;7:2382120520902160. doi: 10.1177/2382120520902160. PMID: 
    32030355; PMCID: PMC6978819.
    28. Khalili H. Online interprofessional education during and post 
    the COVID‑19 pandemic: A commentary. J Interprof Care 
    2020;34:687‑90.
    29. Langlois S, Xyrichis A, Daulton BJ, Gilbert J, Lackie K, Lising D,
    et al. The COVID‑19 crisis silver lining: Interprofessional education 
    to guide future innovation. J Interprof Care 2020;34:587‑92.
    30. Jones TA, Vidal G, Taylor C. Interprofessional education during 
    the COVID‑19 pandemic: Finding the good in a bad situation. 
    J Interprof Care 2020;34:633‑46.
    31. Winship JM, Falls K, GregoryM, Peron EP, Donohoe KL, Sargent L,
    et al.Acase study in rapid adaptation of interprofessional education 
    and remote visits during COVID‑19. JInterprof Care 2020;34:702‑5.
    32. Serwe KM, Bowman C. Telehealth experiential learning: 
    A pilot study of the client’s experience. J Occup Ther Educ 
    2018;2 (2):Article 5. [doi: 10.26681/jote. 2018.020205].
    33. Hill B. Research into experiential learning in nurse education. Br 
    J Nurs 2017;26:932‑8.
    34. Chike‑Harris KE, Durham C, Logan A, Smith G, DuBose‑MorrisR. 
    Integration of telehealth education into the health care provider 
    curriculum: A review. Telemed J E Health 2021;27:137‑49.
    35. Cheng C, Humphreys H, Kane B. Transition to telehealth : 
    Engaging medical students in telemedicine healthcare delivery. 
    Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Oct 9:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02720-1.  
  2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34626350; PMCID: PMC8501374.
    36. Bokhari NM, Zafar M. Learning styles and approaches among 
    medical education participants. J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:181.
    37. Rajati F, Sharifirad G, Babakhani M, Mohebi S. The effect of 
    team‑based learning on public health students’ educational 
    outcomes. J Educ Health Promot 2018;7:140.
    38. Gee N. A study of student completion strategies in a Likert‑type 
    course evaluation survey. J Further High Educ 2017;41:340‑50