Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Faculty of Education Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile

2 Doctorate in Education Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) is a global pandemic that has modified all 
social and, especially, learning instances. The purpose of this study was to determine the perception 
of final‑year nursing students at a university in southern Chile regarding the impact of the pandemic 
on their learning, and consequently on their quality of life, in the context of the COVID‑19 pandemic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a qualitative study. The research was conducted on 14 nursing 
students who were selected from a university located in the province of Talca, Maule Region, Chile. 
Data collection was done through semi‑structured interviews conducted during July and September 
2021. The data were analyzed using the inductive logic of theoretical categorization; this process 
was assisted by the Nvivo 10 program.
RESULTS: Two mega categories were generated that accounted for the nursing students’ experience 
during the COVID‑19 pandemic: objective factors category and subjective factors category. Six 
subcategories were derived from these two categories: free time, social relationships, learning from 
practice, physical exercise, eating habits, and emotional state.
CONCLUSION: The research findings indicate that the students, in addition to feeling upset about 
not being able to do the internship, also feel that they have not been able to acquire all the knowledge 
necessary for their training and professional development, since the virtual classes fail to deliver 
adequate learning as they lack the practical component that is so important in their careers. This has 
repercussions in the physical, social, and psychological areas, affecting their quality of life.

Keywords

1. Hua J, Shaw R. Corona virus (Covid‑19) “infodemic” and emerging 
issues through a data lens: The case of China. Int J Environ Res 
Public Health 2020;17:2309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph 17072309.
2. Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi ZL. Characteristics of SARS‑CoV‑2 and 
COVID‑19. Nat Rev Microbiol 2021;19:141‑54.
3. Sepulveda‑Escobar P, Morrison A. Online teaching placement 
during the COVID‑19 pandemic in Chile: Challenges and 
opportunities. Eur Journal Teach Educ 2020;43:587‑607.
4. Sharma K, Deo G, Timalsina S, Joshi A, Shrestha N, Neupane HC. 
Online learning in the face of COVID‑19 pandemic: Assessment 
of students’ satisfaction at Chitwan medical college of Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2020;18:40‑7.
5. Singh HK, Joshi A, Malepati RN, Najeeb S, Balakrishna P, 
Pannerselvam NK, et al. A survey of E‑learning methods in 
nursing and medical education during COVID‑19 pandemic in 
India. Nurse Educ Today 2021;99:104796. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt. 
2021.104796.
6. Bączek M, Zagańczyk‑Bączek M, Szpringer M, Jaroszyński A, 
Wożakowska‑Kapłon B. Students’ perception of online learning 
during the COVID‑19 pandemic: A survey study of Polish 
medical students. Medicine 2021;100:e24821. doi: 10.1097/
MD.0000000000024821.
7. Agu CF, Stewart J, McFarlane‐Stewart N, Rae T. COVID-19 
pandemic effects on nursing education: Looking through the lens 
of a developing country. Int Nurs Rev 2021;68:153‑8.
8. Bdair IA. Nursing students’ and faculty members’ perspectives 
about online learning during COVID‑19 pandemic: A qualitative 
study. Teach Learn Nurs 2021;16:220‑6.
9. Diab GM, Elgahsh NF. E‑learning during COVID‑19 pandemic: 
Obstacles faced nursing students and its effect on their attitudes 
while applying it. Am J Nurs 2020;9:300‑14.
10. Dewart G, Corcoran L, Thirsk L, Petrovic K. Nursing education in 
a pandemic: Academic challenges in response to COVID‑19. Nurse 
Educ Today 2020;92:104471. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt. 2020.104471.
11. García‑González J, Ruqiong W, Alarcon‑Rodriguez R, 
Requena‑Mullor M, Ding C, Ventura‑Miranda MI. Analysis of 
anxiety levels of nursing students because of e‑learning during 
the COVID‑19 pandemic. Healthcare 2021;9:252. doi: 10.3390/
healthcare9030252.
12. Kim SH, Park S. Influence of learning flow and distance 
e‑learning satisfaction on learning outcomes and the moderated 
mediation effect of social‑evaluative anxiety in nursing college 
students during the COVID‑19 pandemic: A cross‑sectional 
study. Nurse Educ Pract 2021;56:103197. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr. 
2021.103197.
13. Olum R, Atulinda L, Kigozi E, Nassozi DR, Mulekwa A, 
Bongomin F, et al. Medical education and E‑learning during 
COVID‑19 pandemic: Awareness, attitudes, preferences, and 
barriers among undergraduate medicine and nursing students 
at Makerere University, Uganda. J Med Educ Curric Dev 2020;7. 
doi: 10.1177/2382120520973212.
14. Ulenaers D, Grosemans J, SchrootenW, Bergs J. Clinical placement 
experience of nursing students during the COVID‑19 pandemic: 
A cross‑sectional study. Nurse Educ Today 2021;99:104746. doi: 
10.1016/j.nedt. 2021.104746.
15. Backhaus I, D’Egidio V, Saulle R, Masala D, Firenze A, De Vito E, 
et al. Health‑related quality of life and its associated factors: 
Results of a multi‑center cross‑sectional study among university 
students. J Public Health 2019;42:285‑93.
16. Ziapour A, Kianipour N. Health‑related quality of life among 
university students: The role of demographic variables. J Clin 
Diagn Res 2018;12:1‑4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2018/29161.11258.
17. Chachula KM. Professional quality of life factors and relationships 
in nursing and psychiatric nursing students: An exploratory 
study. SAGE Open Nurs 2021;7:2377960821994394. doi: 
10.1177/2377960821994394.
18. ZhengM, JinH, ShiN, DuanC, WangD, YuX, et al. The relationship 
between health literacy and quality of life: A systematic review 
and meta‑analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018;16:1‑10. doi: 
10.1186/s12955‑018‑1031‑7.
19. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Physical 
Activity 2018 2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. 
World Health Organization: Place: GENEVA year: 2018.
20. Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage 
Publications Limited; 2018.
21. Bailey CR, Bailey CA. A Guide to Qualitative Field Research. 
London: Sage Publications; 2017.
22. Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using 
content analysis. Nurs Plus Open 2016;2:8‑14.
23. Morse J. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in 
qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res 2015;25:1212‑22.
24. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data. 5th ed. Los Angeles, 
CA: SAGE Publications; 2014.
25. Casafont C, Fabrellas N, Rivera P, Olivé‑Ferrer MC, Querol E, 
Venturas M, et al. Experiences of nursing students as healthcare 
aid during the COVID‑19 pandemic in Spain: Aphemonenological 
research study. Nurse Educ Today 2020;97:104711. doi: 10.1016/j.
nedt. 2020.104711.
26. Konrad S, Fitzgerald A, Deckers C. Nursing fundamentals–
supporting clinical competency online during the COVID‑19 
pandemic. Teach Learn Nurs 2021;16:53‑6.
27. Sveinsdóttir H, Flygenring BG, Svavarsdóttir MH, 
Thorsteinsson HS, Kristófersson GK, Bernharðsdóttir J, et al. 
Predictors of university nursing students burnout at the time of 
the COVID‑19 pandemic: A cross‑sectional study. Nurse Educ 
Today 2021;106:105070. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt. 2021.105070.
28. Christopher R, de Tantillo L, Watson J. Academic caring 
pedagogy, presence, and communitas in nursing education during 
the COVID‑19 pandemic. Nurs Outlook 2020;68:822‑9.
29. Oducado RMF, Soriano GP. Shifting the education paradigm 
amid the COVID 19 pandemic: Nursing students’ attitude to E 
learning. Afr J Nurs Midwifery 2021;23:1‑14. doi: 10.12669/pjms. 
36.COVID19‑S4.2766. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/8090.
30. Khobragade SY, Soe H, Khobragade YS, Abas A. Virtual learning 
during the COVID‑19 pandemic: What are the barriers and how to 
overcome them? J Educ Health Promot 2021;10:360. doi: 10.4103/
jehp.jehp_14.
31. Dos Santos LM. How does COVID‑19 pandemic influence the 
sense of belonging and decision‑making process of nursing 
students: The study of nursing students’ experiences. Int J Environ 
Res Public Health 2020;17:5603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph 17155603.
32. Ghadrdoost B, Sadeghipour P, Amin A, Bakhshandeh H, Noohi F, 
Maleki M, et al. Validity and reliability of a virtual education 
satisfaction questionnaire from the perspective of cardiology 
residents during the COVID‑19 pandemic. J Educ Health Promot 
2021;10. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_32_21.
33. Leigh JA, Bolton M, Cain K, Harrison N, Yates‑Bolton NJ, 
Ratcliffe SM. Student experiences of nursing on the front line 
during the COVID‑19 pandemic. Br J Nurs 2020;29:788‑9.
34. Martin‑Delgado L, Goni‑Fuste B, Alfonso‑Arias C, De Juan M, 
Wennberg L, Rodríguez E, et al. Nursing students on the frontline: 
Impact and personal and professional gains of joining the health 
care workforce during the COVID‑19 pandemic in Spain. J Prof 
Nurs 2021;37:588‑97.
35. Santos LMD The relationship between the COVID‑19 pandemic 
and nursing students’ sense of belonging: The experiences 
and nursing education management of pre‑service nursing 
professionals. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:5848. doi: 
10.3390/ijerph 17165848.
36. Velarde‑García JF, Cachón‑Pérez JM, Rodríguez‑García M, 
Oliva‑Fernández O, González‑Sanz P, Espejo MM, et al. The 
challenges of “learning on the go”: A qualitative study of 
final‑year Spanish nursing students incorporated to work during 
the first Covid‑19 pandemic. Nurse Educ Today 2021;103:104942. 
doi: 10.1016/j.nedt. 2021.104942.
37. Ge Y, Xin S, Luan D, Zou Z, Liu M, Bai X, et al. Association of 
physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration on the 
health‑related quality of life of college students in Northeast 
China. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019;17:1‑8. doi: 10.1186/
s12955‑019‑1194‑x.
38. Snedden TR, Scerpella J, Kliethermes SA, NormanRS, Blyholder L, 
Sanfilippo J, et al. Sport and physical activity level impacts 
health‑related quality of life among collegiate students. Am J 
Health Promot 2019;33:675‑82.
39. Zhang T, Xiang P, Gu X, Rose M. College students’ physical 
activity and health‑related quality of life: An achievement goal 
perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport 2016;87:182‑90