Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Maryam Feiz Arefi 1
- . Amin Pouya Babaei 2
- . Somaye Barzanouni 3
- . Sahar Ebrahimi 4
- . Amir Reza Salehi 4
- . Farahnaz Khajehnasiri 5
- . Mohsen Poursadeghian 6
1 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Torbat Heidariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heidariyeh, Iran Health Sciences Research Center, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran
2 Department of Occupational Health and safety Engineering, School of Health, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
3 Health Sciences Research Center, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran, Vice Chancellery of Education and Research, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran
4 Clinical Research Development Center, Pastor Educational Hospital, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam, Iran
5 Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Torbat Heidariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heidariyeh, Iran Department of Occupational Health and safety Engineering, School of Health, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many measures have been taken so far to minimize the outbreak of COVID‑19, but
it is still unclear to what extent people have understood the risk. Public participation plays a vital role
in better and effective control of the coronavirus, and the importance of risk perception is effective
in their preventive behavior. The aim of this study was to investigate the pandemic risk perception
of coronavirus disease after began of pandemic in Iranian society.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross‑sectional study was conducted in Iran in spring 2020. The
data collection tool was a researcher‑made questionnaire. The questions were extracted through
interviews with experts and summarizing the opinions of public interviews, etc., The questionnaire
was made available to the public through social media. The information was collected within
3 months. Quantitative data were reported as mean ± standard deviation and the qualitative data
were reported as number and percent. Multiple linear regression and cross were also used to examine
the demographic factors associated with risk perception. Data Analysis was performed using the
SPSS version 21 statistical software.
RESULTS: In this study, 402 individuals from 28 provinces (Azarbaijan Gharbi, Azarbaijan Sharghi,
Alborz, Ardabil, Bushehr, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Esfahan, Fars, Ghazvin, Gilan, Golestan,
Hamedan, Hormozgan, Ilam, Kerman, Kermanshah, Khorasan Razavi, Khorasan Shomali, Khuzestan,
Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, Kurdistan, Lorestan, Mazandaran, Semnan, Sistan and Baluchestan,
Tehran, Yazd, and Zanjan) of Iran participated. The risk perception score obtained from the sum
of the scores of the questions was classified into quartiles. Accordingly, the risk perception score
of (22.9) 92 people was very low, (26.6) 107 people low, (26.9) 108 people moderate, and (23.6) 95
people high. The results of multiple linear regression showed that the variables of gender (P = 0.008)
and occupation (P = 0.013) had a significant relationship with risk perception. There was no
significant relationship between risk perception and variables of age, marital status, and level of
education (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The study showed that the risk perception of the people is more in categories
of moderate to high. Assessing the risk perception of a pandemic can be helpful for preventive
measurements and planning, and also, according to the results of the research, can be done
appropriate educational interventions. Given that 47.5% of respondents were employees, of course,
it should be noted that in sending a questionnaire virtually, there is usually a lot of loss and this is
a limitation of the research. The results of this study can be useful in making prevention decisions
and maintaining safety and health in the workplace.
Keywords
Poursadeghian M, Hami M, A Study of Preventive Behaviors
Against COVID-19 in the Lifestyle of Iranian Society of in Iran
after one Years of Pandemic. JOHE. 2022;11,1, X.
2. KhajehnasiriF, ZaroushaniV, PoursadeqiyanM. Macroergonomics
and health workers during COVID‑19 pandemic. Work
2021;69:713‑4.
3. Soltaninejad M, Babaei‑Pouya A, Poursadeqiyan M, Feiz Arefi M.
Ergonomics factors influencing school education during the
COVID‑19 pandemic: A literature review. Work 2021;68:69‑75.
4. Xu K, Cai H, Shen Y, Ni Q, Chen Y, Hu S, et al. Management of
corona virus disease‑19 (COVID‑19): The Zhejiang experience.
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2020;49:147‑57.
5. Poursadeqiyan M, Kasseri N, Pouya AB, ghalichi-zaveh Z, Abbasi
M, Khajehnasiri F, et al. The fear of COVID-19 infection after one
years of jobs reopening in Iranian society, J Health Sci Surveillance
Sys. 2022;10.
6. Dargahi A, Gholizadeh H, Poursadeghiyan M, Hamidzadeh Y,
Hamidzadeh MH, Hosseini J. Health-promoting behaviors in
staff and students of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. J
Edu Health Promot 2022;9.
7. Samadipour E, Ghardashi F. Factors influencing Iranians’ risk
perception of COVID‑19. J Mil Med 2020;22:122‑9.
8. Kwok KO, Li K K, Hin Chan H H, Yuan Yi Y, Tang A,
Wei WI, et al. Community responses during the early phase
of the COVID‑19 epidemic in Hong Kong: Risk perception,
information exposure and preventive measures. medRxiv 2020;
26 (7):1575‑1579.
9. Maddux JE, Rogers RW. Protection motivation and self‑efficacy:
A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Exp Soc
Psychol 1983;19:469‑79.
10. Rosa EA. White, Black, and Gray: Critical Dialogue with the
International Risk Governance Council’s Framework for Risk
Governance, in Global Risk Governance. Germany: Springer;
2008. p. 101‑18.
11. Li JB, Yang A, Dou K, Wang LX, Zhang MC, Lin XQ. Chinese
public’s knowledge, perceived severity, and perceived
controllability of COVID‑19 and their associations with emotional
and behavioural reactions, social participation, and precautionary
behaviour: A national survey. BMC Public Health 2020;20:1589.
12. Wise T, Zbozinek TD, Michelini G, Hagan CC, Mobbs D. Changes
in risk perception and self‑reported protective behaviour during
the first week of the COVID‑19 pandemic in the United States.
R Soc Open Sci 2020;7:200742.
13. Cori L, Bianchi F, Cadum E, Anthonj C. Risk Perception and
COVID‑19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020.19 (19).3114.
14. Rejeski WJ, Fanning J. Models and theories of health behavior
and clinical interventions in aging: A contemporary, integrative
approach. Clin Interv Aging 2019;14:1007‑19.
15. Dryhurst S, Schneider C.R, Kerr J, Freeman A L. J, Recchia G,
van der Bles A.M. Risk perceptions of COVID‑19 around the
world. J Risk Res 2020;23:994‑1006.
16. Chester DK, Duncan AM, Dibben CJ. The importance of religion
in shaping volcanic risk perception in Italy, with special reference
to Vesuvius and Etna. J Volcanol Geothermal Res 2008;172:216‑28.
17. Bruine de Bruin W, Bennett D. Relationships between initial
COVID‑19 risk perceptions and protective health behaviors:
A national survey. Am J Prev Med 2020;59:157‑67.
18. Rezaeipandari H, Mirkhalili S.M, Morowati Sharifabad M.A.,
Ayatollahi J, Fallahzadeh H. Investigation of predictors of
preventive behaviors of influenza A (H1N1) based on health belief
model among people of Jiroft City, (Iran). 2018.12 (3) 76‑86.
19. Alizadeh K, Zareiy S, HoseiniY. H1N1 influenza among suspected
patients in Bes’ at IRIAF hospital Nov and Dec 2009: A case‑series.
Ebnesina 2010;12:26‑9.
20. Shilpa K, Praveen Kumar BA, Yogesh Kumar S, Ugargol Amit R,
Naik Vijaya A, Mallapur MD. A study on awareness regarding
swine flu (influenza A H1N1) pandemic in an urban community
of Karnataka. Med J Dr. DY Patil Univ 2014;7:732‑737
21. Kamate SK, Agrawal A, Chaudhary H, Singh K, Mishra P,
Asawa K. Public knowledge, attitude and behavioural changes
in an Indian population during the Influenza A (H1N1) outbreak.
J Infect Dev Ctries 2009;4:7‑14.
22. Brug J, Aro AR, Oenema A, de Zwart O, Richardus JH, Bishop GD.
SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information
sources, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1486‑9.
23. Taghrir MH, Borazjani R, Shiraly R. COVID‑19 and Iranian
medical students; A survey on their related‑knowledge,
preventive behaviors and risk perception. Arch Iran Med
2020;23:249‑54.
24. Huynh TL. The COVID‑19 risk perception: A survey on
socioeconomics and media attention. Econ Bull 2020;40:758‑64.
25. Renner B, et al. Risk perception, risk communication and
health behavior change: Health psychology at the University of
Konstanz. Zeitschrift Für Gesundheitspsychol 2008;16:150‑3.
26. Zera CA, Nicklas JM, Levkoff SE, Seely EW. Diabetes risk
perception in women with recent gestational diabetes: Delivery to
the postpartum visit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:691‑6.
27. Gidengil CA, Parker AM, Zikmund‑Fisher BJ. Trends in risk
perceptions and vaccination intentions: A longitudinal study
of the first year of the H1N1 pandemic. Am J Public Health
2012;102:672‑9.
28. Sadique MZ, Edmunds WJ, Smith RD, Meerding WJ, de Zwart O,
Brug J, et al. Precautionary behavior in response to perceived
threat of pandemic influenza. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:1307‑13.
29. Kupferschmidt K, Cohen J. China’s aggressive measures have
slowed the coronavirus. They may not work in other countries.
Science 2020;2;3193.
)