Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Babak Moeini
- . Amir Erfani 1
- . Majid Barati 2
- . Amin Doosti‑Irani 3
- . Hatam Hosseini 4
- . Mokhtar Soheylizad 5
1 Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Nipissing University, Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Public Health, School of Health, Autism Spectrum Disorders Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4 Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu‑Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Nipissing University, Ontario, Canada
5 Department of Public Health, School of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childbearing is the most important determinant of population fluctuations and its
studies are more important than other population phenomena. Many factors are associated with
childbearing, but individual factors associated with it have been less studied in a specific framework.
The present study aimed to explore and identify the factors related to childbearing based on extended
theory of planned behavior (ETPB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted among married women <35 years
of age and married men whose spouses were under 35 years of age and lived in the City of Hamadan,
Iran, in 2019. The data were collected by semistructured and face‑to‑face in‑depth interviews and
continued until the data saturation was reached. Overall, 15 interviews were conducted with 17
people. The data were analyzed, using a directed content analysis approach.
RESULTS: The data analysis resulted in the extraction of 28 main codes, 9 subcategories, and 4
themes, which were correspond to constructs of the theory, consisting of attitudes, subjective norms,
perceived behavioral control, and social support in the field of childbearing. The main predictors were
attitude toward childbearing and perceived control.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study showed that ETPB has a potential to explain the intention
and behavior of childbearing. The ETPB makes it possible to understand many of the factors
associated with childbearing. The results of this study could be the basis for designing appropriate
data collection instrument in quantitative studies and vast surveys.
Keywords
1. Khorram R, Hasani M, Karimy M, Mohammadi A, Ranjbaran M.
Factors related to women’s fertility intent: A study based on the
theory of rational action. J Holist Nurs Midwifery 2017;27:57‑66.
2. Jafari H, Jaafaripooyan E, Vedadhir AA, Foroushani AR,
Ahadinejad B, Pourreza A. Socio‑economic factors influencing
on total fertility rate in Iran: A panel data analysis for the period
of 2002‑2012. Electron Physician 2016;8:2551‑6.
3. Erfani A, Shojaei J. Reasons for intending to have no children in
Tehran, Iran. Community Health 2019;6:116‑29.
4. Roudi F, Azadi P, Mesgaran M. Iran’s Population Dynamics
and Demographic Window of Opportunity. Working Paper 4,
Stanford Iran 2040 Project, Stanford University; 2017.
5. Erfani A. Fertility in Tehran city and Iran: Rates, trends and
differentials. Popul Stud 2013;1:87‑107.
6. Keshavarz H. A study on the factors influencing the space between
marriage and having children (case study: Married women of
20‑49 in Isfahan). J Appl Sociol 2013;24:111‑25.
7. Erfani A. Policy implications of cultural shifts and enduring low
fertility in Iran. Community Health 2019;6:112‑5.
8. Erfani A. Low fertility intention in Tehran, Iran: The role of
attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control. J Biosoc Sci
2017;49:292‑308.
9. Mencarini L, Vignoli D, Gottard A. Fertility intentions and
outcomes: Implementing the Theory of Planned Behavior with
graphical models. Adv Life Course Res 2015;23:14‑28.
10. Aizen I, Klobas J. Fertility intentions: An approach based on the
theory of planned behavior. Demogr Res 2013;29:203‑32.
11. Buber I, Fliegenschnee K. Are You Ready for a Child? A
Methodological Triangulation on Fertility Intentions in Austria.
Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers; 2011.
12. Baki‑Hashemi S, Kariman N, Ghanbari S, Pourhoseingholi MA,
Moradi M. Factors affecting the decline in childbearing in Iran:
A systematic review. Adv Nurs Midwifery 2018;27:11‑9.
13. KarimanN, AmerianM, JannatiP, SalmaniF, HamzekhaniM. Apath
analysisoffactors influencingthefirst childbearingdecision‑making
in women in Shahroud in 2014. Glob J Health Sci 2016;8:55381.
14. Araban M, Karimy M, Armoon B, Zamani‑Alavijeh F.
Factors related to childbearing intentions among women:
A cross‑sectional study in health centers, Saveh, Iran. J Egypt
Public Health Assoc 2020;95:6.
15. Kariman N, Amerian M, Jannati P, Salmani F. Factors influencing
first childbearing timing decisions among men: Path analysis. Int
J Reprod Biomed 2016;14:589‑96.
16. Klobas J. Social Psychological Influences on Fertility Intentions:
A Study of Eight Countries in Different Social, Economic and
Policy Contexts. Report to the European Commission within
the Project “Reproductive Decision‑Making in a Macro‑Micro
Perspective” (REPRO); 2010.
17. Lune H, Berg BL. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social
Sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2016.
18. Langdridge D, Sheeran P, Connolly K. Understanding the reasons
for parenthood. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2005;23:121‑33.
19. Ramezankhani A, Manouchehri H, Hajizadeh E, Haghi M. The
decision‑making process of childbearing: A qualitative study.
Payesh (Health Monitor) 2013;12:505‑15.
20. Behboudi‑Gandevani S, Ziaei S, Farahani FK, Jasper M. The
perspectives of Iranian women on delayed childbearing:
A qualitative study. J Nurs Res 2015;23:313‑21.
21. Holland JA, Keizer R. Family attitudes and fertility timing in
Sweden. Eur J Popul 2015;31:259‑85.
22. Khadivzadeh T, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Bahrami M. The influence
of gender role and women’s empowerment on couples’ fertility
experiences in urban society of Mashhad, Iran. J Midwifery
Reprod Health 2014;2:170‑9.
23. Kavas S, de Jong J. Exploring the mechanisms through which
social ties affect fertility decisions in Turkey. J Marriage Fam
2020;82:1250‑69.
24. Lappegård T, Kornstad T. Social norms about father involvement
and women’s fertility. Soc Forces 2020;99:398‑423.
25. Bandehelahi K, Khoshravesh S, Barati M, Tapak L. Psychological
and sociodemographic predictors of fertility intention among
childbearing‑aged women in Hamadan, West of Iran: An
application of the BASNEF model. Korean J Fam Med
2019;40:182‑7.
26. Yousefi‑Nayer M, Poorolajal J, Cheraghi Z. Reasons behind the
tendency toward the only child in Iranian families: A conventional
content analysis study. Shiraz Emed J 2019;20:e82916.
27. Abbasi‑Shavazi MJ, Ebadi A. Factors affecting on fertility behavior
from the perspective of professionals: A qualitative study.
Koomesh 2019;21:155‑63.
28. Dommermuth L, Klobas J, Lappegård T. Now or later? The theory
of planned behavior and timing of fertility intentions. Adv Life
Course Res 2011;16:42‑53.
29. Khadivzadeh T, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Bahrami M, Taghipour A,
Abbasi Shavazi J. The influence of social network on couples’
intention to have the first child. Iran J Reprod Med 2013;11:209‑18.
)