Authors
1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Child Growth and Development Research Center, Primordial Prevention of NonCommunicable Diseases Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Health Information Technology Research Center, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Today, the ability of the organizations to successfully knowledge management and sharing can
help them in better performance. Effective knowledge sharing (KS) in the clinical context provides
better clinical decisions and improves the quality of care services. This systematic review will be
conducted to identify the factors related to the clinical KS (CKS). This systematic literature review will
be conducted to search the published documents about the affecting factors on the (clinical) KS. To
this end, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane, Embase, SID, Magiran, IranDoc,
and ISC will be thoroughly assessed with considered keywords and search strategy. No time limit
will be considered and all relevant documents published will be evaluated until the start date of the
search. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review study has been conducted on the factors
related to CKS and our research will try to comprehensively extract the effective factors in this topic.
Identifying the factors affecting CKS will lead to transparency in the exchange and interpretation of
clinical knowledge in clinical care delivery and making the best clinical decisions as well as improving
the quality of clinical care. It will also provide a condition to facilitate the delivery of more effective
clinical education for policymakers in the field of clinical education.
Keywords
effective of effector factors to knowledge share in the Iranian
virtual social. Public Manage Res 2014;7:107‑28.
2. Delkir K. Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice.
Massachusetts: Butterworth‑Heinemann; 2005. p. 44.
3. DavenportTH, PrusakL. Working Knowledge: How Organizations
Manage What They Know. Brighton, Massachusetts: Harvard
Business School Press; 2000. p. 56.
4. Hinds PJ, Patterson M, Pfeffer J. Bothered by abstraction: The
effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice
performance. J Appl Psychol 2001;86:1232‑43.
5. Zhang J, Faerman SR. The nature of knowledge and its influence
on knowledge sharing practice: Experiences from building the
MACROS system. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences. New York: Institute
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers;2004. Available from:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1265576. [Last accessed
on 2021 Dec 25].
6. Sundaresan S, Zhang Z. Facilitating knowledge transfer in
organizations through incentive alignment and IT investment.
In: 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2004.
7. Kim S, Lee H. Employee knowledge sharing capabilities in
public & private organizations: Does organizational context
matter? In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International
Conference on System Sciences. New York: Institute of Electrical
and Electronics Engineers;2005.
8. Chaudhry AS. Knowledge sharing practices in Asian institutions:
A multi‑cultural perspective from Singapore. In: Proceedings
of World Library and Information Congress: 71st IFLA General
Conference and Council; “Libraries ‑ A voyage of discovery”.
Oslo: International Federation of Library Associations and
Institutions;2005. Available from: http://www.ifla.org/IV/
ifla71/papers/066e‑Chaudhry.pdf.[Last accessed on 2021 Dec 25].
9. Arthur JB, Huntley CL. Ramping up the organizational
learning curve: Assessing the impact of deliberate learning on
organizational performance under gain sharing. Acad Manag J
2005;48:1159‑70.
10. Lin HF. Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An
empirical study. Int J Manpow 2007;28:315‑32.
11. Nemati‑Anaraki L. Inter‑organizational knowledge sharing:
A comprehensive model. J Mod Med Inf Sci 2015;1:10‑24.
12. Hossein Gholi Zadeh R, Mir Kamali S. Key affecting factors on knowledge sharing; Case study‑ Ferdowsi University (Faculty of
Educational Sciences and Psychology). JIran High Educ 2010;3:63.
13. Keikha F. Interpersonal trust factors affecting members’
knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities. Iran J Inform
Process Manage 2018;34:275‑300.
14. Taghipour M, Mahboobi M, Gharagozlou H. The impact of ICT
on knowledge sharing obstacles in knowledge management
process (Including Case‑Study). Iran J Inform Process Manage
2016;31:1049‑74.
15. Sahebalzamani M, Adhami moghadam F, Ahmadi SH, Zare M,
Hamzepour H. The relationship between learning styles with
evidence‑based function in clinical assistants of Kermanshah
university of medical sciences hospitals. J Jundishapur Educ Dev
2019;10:12‑20.
16. Taghizadeh H, Ziaei Hajipirloo M. Presenting a model of
relationships between knowledge sharing components in
educational institutions with an interpretive structural modeling
approach (case study). J Exec Manage 2014;5:3.
17. Lin TC, Lai MC, Yang SW. Factors influencing physicians’
knowledge sharing on web medical forums. Health Informatics
J 2016;22:594‑607.
18. Zhou L, Nunes MB. Barriers to knowledge sharing in Chinese
healthcare referral services: An emergent theoretical model. Glob
Health Action 2016;9:29964.
19. Permwonguswa S, Khuntia J, Yim D, Gregg D, Kathuria A.
Knowledge sharing in a health infomediary: Role of self‑concept,
emoti.onal empowerment, and self‑esteem. Heal Syst
2018;7:181‑94.
20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‑analyses:
The PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006‑12.
)