Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Xavier Belsiyal. C
- . Ankit Srivastav 1
- . Sukanya Ray 2
- . M. Krishna Prasad 3
- . Abhijit P. Pakhare 4
- . Bertha A. D. Rathinam 1
1 Department of Anatomy, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Department of Clinical Psychology, TISS, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
4 Department of CFM, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human anatomy instruction is mostly focused on cadaver dissection and prosected
specimen examination. Exposure to cadaver dissection can be a stressful experience that may cause
a wide variety of symptoms among students of health sciences. To compare and evaluate the effect
of in‑vitro and in‑vivo exposure on cadaveric anxiety, disgust propensity and sensitivity, and attitude
toward death and dying among 1st‑year medical and nursing students.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An open‑label randomized trial (matched‑control experimental
design) was conducted among 127 1st‑year Medical and Nursing students from a selected Institute of
National Importance, Bhopal, India during 2015. The participants were divided into an experimental
and control group based on matched trait anxiety scores using the Trait Anxiety Inventory. Followed
by preassessment, video demonstration with cadaver dissection (in vitro exposure) was then
administered to the experimental group, while the control group had direct exposure to cadaver
dissection (in vivo exposure).
RESULTS: The study showed that there was a statistically significant difference in state anxiety
related to cadaver dissection in the experimental group (P = 0.01). However, video‑demonstration of
cadaver dissection did not have any effect on disgust propensity and sensitivity and attitude toward
death and dying.
CONCLUSION: The findings provided evidence that video‑demonstration of cadaver dissection
reduced anxiety, although it did not have any effect on disgust and attitudes of death. The dissection
hall experience may evoke feelings of anxiety and disgust that need to be addressed through advanced
preparedness and coping strategies, especially among medical and nursing students.
Keywords
students to the dissection hall experience. NJIRM 2010;1(4):4‑9.
2. Chang HJ, Kim HJ, Rhyu IJ, Lee YM, Uhm CS. Emotional
experiences of medical students during cadaver dissection and
the role of memorial ceremonies: A qualitative study. BMC Med
Educ 2018;18:255.
3. Sándor I, Birkás E, Győrffy Z. The effects of dissection‑room
experiences and related coping strategies among Hungarian
medical students. BMC Med Educ 2015;15:73.
4. Chia TI, Oyeniran OI, Ajagbe AO, Onigbinde OA, Oraebosi MI.
The symptoms and stress experienced by medical students in
anatomy dissection halls. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2020;15:8‑13.
5. Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool
for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat Sci Educ
2017;10:286‑99.
6. Communication S, Javadnia F, Hashemitabar M ,
Kalantarmahdavi SR, Khajehmougahi N. How to decrease the
emotional impact of cadaver dissection in Medical students. Pak
J Med Sci 2006;22:4‑7.
7. Davey GC. Disgust: The disease‑avoidance emotion and its
dysfunctions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011;366:3453‑65.
8. Zanjani Z, Yaghubi H, Fata L, Shaiiri M, Gholami M. The
mediating role of fear of contagion in explaining the relationship
between disgust propensity and fear of contamination. Iran J
Psychiatry Clin Psychol 2018;23:454‑65.
9. Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R, Vagg P, Jacobs G. Manual
for the State‑Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting
Psychologists Press; 1983.
10. Olatunji BO, Cisler JM, Deacon BJ, Connolly K, Lohr JM. The
disgust propensity and sensitivity scale‑revised: Psychometric
properties and specificity in relation to anxiety disorder
symptoms. J Anxiety Disord 2007;21:918‑30.
11. Wong P, Reker G, Gesser G. Death attitude profile‑revised:
A multidimensional measure of attitudes toward death. In: Death
Anxiety Handbook: Research, Instrumentation, and Application.
Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis; 1994:121‑148.
12. State‑Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults (STAI‑AD)‑Assessments,
Tests | Mind Garden‑Mind Garden. Available from: https://
www.mindgarden.com/145‑state‑trait ‑anxiety‑inventory‑for
‑adults. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 19].
13. Randler C, Demirhan E, Wüst‑Ackermann P, Desch IH. Influence
of a dissection video clip on anxiety, affect, and self‑efficacy in
educational dissection: A treatment study. CBE Life Sci Educ
2016;15:ar1.
14. Mulu A, Tegabu D. Medical students’ attitudinal changes towards
cadaver dissection: A longitudinal study. Ethiop J Health Sci
2012;22:51‑8.
15. Bob MH, Popescu CA, Suciu ŞM, Buzoianu AD. First year medical
students’ attitude toward anatomical corpse dissection and its
relationship with their personality. Rom J Morphol Embryol
2015;56:321‑4.
16. Bati AH, Ozer MA, Govsa F, Pinar Y. Anxiety of first cadaver
demonstration in medical, dentistry and pharmacy faculty
students. Surg Radiol Anat 2013;35:419‑26.
17. Bernhardt V, Rothkötter HJ, Kasten E. Psychological stress in first
year medical students in response to the dissection of a human
corpse. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2012;29:Doc12.
18. How to Decrease the Emotional Impact of Cadaver Dissection in
Medical Students. Available from: https://pjms.com.pk/issues/
aprjun06/article/sc1.html. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 05].
19. Saylam C, Coskunol H. Orientation lesson in anatomy education.
Surg Radiol Anat 2005;27:74‑7.
20. Dissabandara LO, Nirthanan SN, Khoo TK, Tedman R. Role of
cadaveric dissections in modern medical curricula: A study on
student perceptions. Anat Cell Biol 2015;48:205‑12.
21. Khan HM, Mirza TM. Physical and psychological effects of
cadaveric dissection on undergraduate medical students. J Pak
Med Assoc 2013;63:831‑4.
22. Mc Garvey A, Hickey A, Conroy R. The anatomy room: A positive
learning experience for nursing students. Nurse Educ Today
2015;35:245‑50.
23. Arráez‑Aybar LA, Casado‑Morales MI, Castaño‑Collado G.
Anxiety and dissection of the human cadaver: An unsolvable
relationship? Anat Rec B New Anat 2004;279:16‑23