Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The health reform plan (HRP) is a plan to improve Iran’s health systems that began
in 2014. The three main approaches of this plan include financial protection of the people, creating
justice in access to health services, and improving the quality of services. It predicted that the level
of health system responsiveness would increase. Achieving this goal is possible only with the correct
implementation. The best people to measure the correct implementation are nurses, midwives,
and physicians. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the attitude of nurses, midwives, and
physicians about the implementation of the HRP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross‑sectional descriptive study was conducted in educational
hospitals of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in 2020. By convenience sampling method, 325
nurses, midwives, and physicians participated in this study. Sampling was done in all work shifts, and
in all wards. A researcher‑making questionnaire was used to collect data. The scoring did by the Likert
scale from (completely agree = 4 to completely disagree = 1). Quantitative and qualitative face and
content validity was calculated (IS: 0.84, CVI: 0.92, CVR: 0.87), and its reliability was calculated by
Cronbach’s alpha method (0.78). The data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16. Descriptive
statistics, Mann–Whitney U‑test, and Kruskal–Wallis test were used for the data analysis (P ≤ 0.05).
RESULTS: In the study, 90.15% agreed with the implementation of the HRP. There was no significant
difference between the male and female (P = 0.063). There was a significant difference between the
educational degree (P = 0.006), married and the single participants’ attitude (P = 0.003), the nurses,
midwives, and physicians (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: HRP is more successful in the field of financial protection, so policymakers should
pay more attention to justice in access to health services and improving the quality of services fields.
Keywords
staffs satisfaction in general versus special wards of hospitals of
Jahrom. Glob J Health Sci 2015;7:95‑100.
2. Liu J, Lin Q, Gao Y, Zhang X, Qi D, Wang C, et al. Health care
reform and stroke prognosis in low‑income Chinese populations
from 1992 to 2018. J Glob Health 2021;11:08002.
3. Mandejin MR, Janbazi S. Designing a comprehensive evaluation
model for health reform plan in Iran. J Community Health Res
2021;10:68‑82.
4. Faridfar N, Alimohammadzadeh K, Seyedin SH. The impact
of health system reform on clinical, paraclinical and surgical
indicators as well as patients’ satisfaction in Rasoul‑e‑Akram
hospital in 2013 to 2014. Razi J Med Sci 2016;22:92‑9.
5. Nakhaei Z, Abdolreza Gharehbagh Z, Jalalmanesh S. A survey
on nurses’ satisfaction concerning the health system reform plan
in hospitals affiliated to Birjand University of Medical Sciences
in 2016. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2017;16:61‑72.
6. Sajadi HS, Zaboli R. An assessment of the positive effects of health
reform plan implementation from the perspective of hospital
directors. Health Inf Manage 2016;13:55‑60.
7. Assari AA, Atashbar T, Antoun J, Bossert T. Iran’s Health Reform
Plan: Measuring Changes in Equity Indices. Iran J Public Health 2018;47:390‑396.
8. Maher A, Fazel Z. The effects of Iran’s health sector evolution plan
on catastrophic health expenditures in 2012 and 2015 (before and
after the implementation of HSEP). Health Econ Outcome Res
2021;7:24‑32.
9. Nabilou B, Yusefzadeh H, Salem Safi P. Performance assessment
of health system reform plan in the hospitals affiliated with Urmia
University of Medical Sciences. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac
2017;14:896‑905.
10. Salarvand Sh, Azizimalekabadi M, Jebeli AA, Nazer M.
Challenges experienced by nurses in the implementation of a
healthcare reform plan in Iran. Electron Physician2017;9:4131‑4137.
11. Tajmazinani AA. Challenges of Establishing an Islamic Welfare
State: A Historical Overview of Welfare System Developments in
Post‑Revolution Iran. Social Policy in the Islamic World. Cham:
Palgrave Macmillan; 2021. p. 109‑36.