Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran

2 Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of Adult Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Department of Social Sciences, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most basic life events is fertility or reproduction, which, although known 
as a social phenomenon, is a complex and multidimensional concept with economic, cultural, political, 
and religious significance. The present study aims to explain the pattern of childbearing behaviors 
in couples.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a focused ethnographic qualitative research. Participants 
of this study will be 20–35 years old couples who, using purposeful sampling method, will be selected 
from comprehensive health centers, ultrasound centers, laboratories, premarital counseling centers, 
offices of obstetricians and midwives, universities, shopping centers, cinemas, parks, restaurants, 
and entertainment centers in Isfahan, Iran. Sampling will continue considering the strategy of 
maximum variation in terms of age, occupation, education, and economic status until data saturation 
is reached. Data will be collected through semi‑structured and in‑depth individual interviews, focus 
group discussions, observation, field notes, daily notes, and document analysis. Simultaneous with 
data collection, the data will be analyzed using the thematic analysis method based on Braun and 
Clarke’s approach.
CONCLUSION: This present study is expected to lead to a deep understanding and identification of 
the attitudes, beliefs, and values of couples with regard to childbearing. Moreover, by understanding 
the pattern of childbearing behaviors of couples, useful information will be provided to the policymakers 
and planners for effective planning in the field of healthy childbearing. The findings can also be used 
in reproductive health counseling for newly married couples and community‑based interventions.


Keywords

1. Behjati‑Ardakani Z, Navabakhsh M, Hosseini SH. Sociological 
study on the transformation of fertility and childbearing concept 
in Iran. J Reprod Infertil 2017;18:153‑61.
2. Sear R, Lawson DW, Kaplan H, Shenk MK. Understanding 
variation in human fertility: What can we learn from evolutionary 
demography? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016;371:1-16.
3. Burke NJ, Joseph G, Pasick RJ, Barker JC. Theorizing social 
context: Rethinking behavioral theory. Health Educ Behav 
2009;36 Suppl 5:55S‑70S.
4. Kariman N, Simbar M, Ahmadi F, Vedadhir AA. Socioeconomic 
and emotional predictors of decision making for timing 
motherhood among Iranian women in 2013. Iran Red Crescent 
Med J 2014;16:e13629.
5. Yohannes S, Wondafrash M, Abera M, Girma E. Duration and 
determinants of birth interval among women of child bearing 
age in Southern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:38.
6. Jafari H, Jaafaripooyan E, Vedadhir AA, Foroushani AR, 
Ahadinejad B, Pourreza A. Socio‑economic factors influencing 
on total fertility rate in Iran: A panel data analysis for the period 
of 2002‑2012. Electron Physician 2016;8:2551‑6.
7. The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). The Power of 
Choice. New York: UNFPA State of the World Population Report; 
2018. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/
files/pub‑pdf/UNFPA_PUB_2018_EN_SWP.pdf. [Last accessed 
on 2020 Dec 19].
8. Enayat H, Parnian L. The study of cultural globalization and 
tendency to fertility. Sociol Women 2013;4:109‑36.
9. Hosseini H, Bagi B. Socioeconomic, cultural and demographic 
determinants of childbearing desires among married women 
attending health centers in Hamedan (2012). J Kermanshah Univ 
Med Sci 2014;18:35‑43.
10. Firouzbakht M, Tirgar A, Hajian‑Tilaki K, Ebadi A, Bakouei F, 
Nikpour M, et al. Social capital and fertility behaviors among 
female workers in healthcare settings: Study protocol of a 
sequential explanatory mixed methods study. Reprod Health 
2018;15:67.
11. Tavakol Z, Nasrabadi AN, Moghadam ZB, Salehiniya H. The 
presence of the child, the opportunity or a threat to marital 
satisfaction: A qualitative study. J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:67.
12. Lee R, Mason A; Members of the NTA Network. Is low 
fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and 
consumption. Science 2014;346:229‑34.
13. Verbič M, Spruk R. Aging population and public pensions: 
Theory and macroeconometric evidence. Panoeconomicus 
2014;61:289‑316.
14. Kreyenfeld M, Konietzka D. Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, 
Causes, and Consequences. Germany: Springer Nature; 2017.
15. Holton S, Fisher J, Rowe H. Attitudes toward women and 
motherhood: Their role in Australian women’s childbearing 
behavior. Sex Roles 2009;61:677‑87.
16. Erfani A, Beaujot R. Familial orientations and the rationales for 
childbearing behaviour. Can Stud Popul 2006;33:49‑67.
17. Seifoori B, Darmian GH, Majdi A, Kermani M. Qualitative 
demographic evaluation of fertility among Iranian married women. 
Gend Issues 2021;38:1-14. [doi: 10.1007/s12147‑020‑09267‑y].
18. Baki‑Hashemi S, Kariman N, Ghanbari S, Pourhoseingholi MA, 
Moradi M. Factors affecting the decline in childbearing in Iran: A systematic review. Adv Nurs Midwifery 2018;27:11‑9.
19. DeMaria AL, Rivera S, Naoum Z, Ramos‑Ortiz J, Meier S, 
Dykstra C. Contextualising challenges of reproduction and 
motherhood in Florence, Italy: A qualitative study. Eur J 
Contracept Reprod Health Care 2020;25:8‑19.
20. García D, Brazal S, Rodríguez A, Prat A, Vassena R. Knowledge 
of age‑related fertility decline in women: A systematic review. 
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;230:109‑18.
21. Beaujouan É, Reimondos A, Gray E, Evans A, Sobotka T. Declining 
realisation of reproductive intentions with age. Hum Reprod 
2019;34:1906‑14.
22. Molina‑García L, Hidalgo‑Ruiz M, Cocera‑Ruíz EM, 
Conde‑PuertasE, Delgado‑Rodríguez M, Martínez‑Galiano JM. The 
delay of motherhood: Reasons, determinants, time used to achieve 
pregnancy, and maternal anxiety level. PLoS One 2019;14:e0227063.
23. Azmoude EM, Behnam HB, Barati‑Far SB, Kabirian MM. The 
relationship of socio‑demographic factors, fertility behavior and 
child’s perceived value with fertility. Int J Community Based Nurs 
Midwifery 2017;5:123‑33.
24. Neels K, Murphy M, Ní Bhrolcháin M, Beaujouan É. Rising 
educational participation and the trend to later childbearing. 
Popul Dev Rev 2017;43:667‑93.
25. Lindberg LD, Kost K, Maddow‑Zimet I. The role of men’s 
childbearing intentions in father involvement. J Marriage Fam 
2017;79:44‑59.
26. Isfahan Management and Planning Organization ‑ Deputy of 
Statistics and Information. Excerpts of Results General Census 
of Population and Housing 2016 – Isfahan Province; 2016. 
Available from: https://www.mpo‑es.ir/dorsapax/Data/Sub
_1/File. [Last accessed on 2020 Dec 20].
27. Draper J. Ethnography: Principles, practice and potential. Nurs 
Stand 2015;29:36‑41.
28. Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research in Nursing: 
Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. 5th ed. Philadelphia: 
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
29. Shojaei A, Salari P. COVID‑19 and the “Stay at home” 
recommendation: An ethnographic study. J Edu Health Promot 
2021;10:62.
30. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual 
Res Psychol 2006;3:77‑101.
31. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. New York: Sage 
Publications; 2006.
32. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and Assessing 
Evidence for Nursing Practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott 
Williams & Wilkins; 2017.
33. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. 
London: Sage publications; 2004.
34. Araban M, Karimy M, Armoon B, Zamani‑Alavijeh F. 
Factors related to childbearing intentions among women: 
A cross‑sectional study in health centers, Saveh, Iran. J Egypt 
Public Health Assoc 2020;95:6.
35. Irani M, Khadivzadeh T. The relationship between childbearing 
motivations with fertility preferences and actual child number in 
reproductive‑age women in Mashhad, Iran. J Educ Health Promot 
2018;7:175.
36. Saraei H. Population reproduction of Iran: Current status and 
some policy considerations. QJSS 2015;68:1‑35.
37. Macaluso M, Wright‑Schnapp TJ, Chandra A, Johnson R, 
Satterwhite CL, Pulver A, et al. A public health focus on infertility 
prevention, detection, and management. Fertil Steril 2010;93:10.
e1‑10.
38. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. The influence of attitudes on behavior. In: 
Albarracín D, Johnson BT, Zanna MP, editors. The Handbook of 
Attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2005. p. 173‑221.
39. Razina NV. Attitudes to motherhood in different cultures. Psychol 
Russ 2014;7:93‑104.
40. Roy S, Banerjee P. Finding a Way Out of the Ethnographic 
Paradigm Jungle. Qual Rep 2012;17:1‑20.