3
Undergraduate MBBS Students, AIIMS, Bhopal, India
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ancient Indian science of Yoga makes use of voluntary regulation of breathing to make respiration rhythmic and calm the mind. This practice is called pranayama. Nadisuddhi pranayama means “purification of subtle energy paths,” inhalation and exhalation are through alternative nostrils for successive respiratory cycles. Surya Anuloma‑Viloma pranayama means “heat generating breathing particle” when the respiratory cycle of inhalation and exhalation is completed through the right nostril exclusively. When completed through the left nostril alone, the practice is called “Chandra Anuloma‑Viloma pranayama,” which means a heat‑dissipating or cooling liberating practice. We compared the effect of right nostril breathing (RNA) and left nostril breathing (LNB) pranayama on heart rate variability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at the Department of Physiology at an institute of national importance, after obtaining necessary ethical approvals from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Twenty healthy kriya yogi volunteers (mean age: 44 years), who are regular practitioners for the last 10–20 years, were inducted into the study. RNB pranayama starts with closing the right nostril with the thumb of the left hand followed by exhalation through the right nostril and inhaling slowly through the same nostril. This forms one round of RNB pranayama. In contrast, inhalation through the left nostril and exhalation through the right nostril exclusively is called chandrabhedana pranayama (chandrabhedana means moon‑piercing breath in Sanskrit) with a similar variation called Chandra Anuloma‑Viloma pranayama in which inhalation, as well as exhalation, is performed through the left nostril exclusively. The recording of electrocardiogram (ECG) for heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was taken by heart rate variability (Dinamika HRV‑Advanced Heart Rate Variability Test System, Moscow, Russia). The resting and during readings of heart rate variability parameters were compared and post hoc analysis was done using Bonferroni and Holm multiple comparisons for repeated measures. RESULTS: Time domain parameters: Standard deviation of normal to normal RR intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive NN interval differences (RMSSD) were increased at a high level of statistical significance during both pranayama maneuvres. Frequency domain parameters: LF, LF/ HF ratio increased significantly. Parasympathetic activity is represented by LF when the respiration rate is lower than 7 breaths per min or during taking a deep breath. Thus, when the subject is in a state of relaxation with slow and even breathing in both RNB—right nostril and Chandra—LNB, the LF values can be very high, indicating an increase in parasympathetic activity rather than an increase in sympathetic regulation. CONCLUSION: Our study is an acute study, where changes in HRV were seen after 5 min of RNB and LNB. However, statistically, there is not much difference in the immediate effects of the two pranayamas on heart rate variability in regular yoga practitioners.
Sri ParamhansaYogananda. Shiv Swarodaya With Arjuna. The Bhagavad Gita Royal Science of God‑Realization. The immortal dialogue between soul and spirit. A new translation and commentary 2002: Chapter IV Verse 29.p. 496‑507. 2. Backon J. Changes in blood glucose levels induced by different forced nostril breathing, a technique which effects brain hemi‑sphericity and autonomic activity. Med Sci Res 1988;16:1197‑9. 3. Bhargava R, Gogate MG, MascarchasJF. Autonomic responses to breath holding and its variations following pranayama. Indian J Pharmacol 1988; 32:257‑64. 4. Stoksted P. The physiologic cycle of the nose under normal and pathologic conditions. Acta Otolaryngol 1952;42:175‑9. 5. Keuning J. On the nasal cycle. J Int Rhinol 1968;6:99‑135. 6. Muktibobhananda S. SwaraYoga. Yoga Publications Trust; 1999. 7. Swarodaya S. Chapter V. Verses 102‑113, Verses 114‑123, Verse 130. 8. McCraty R, Shaffer F. Heart rate variability: New perspectives on physiological mechanisms, assessment of self‑regulatory capacity, and health risk. Glob Adv Health Med 2015;4:46‑61. 9. Telles S, Nagarathna R, Nagendra HR. Breathing through a particular nostril can alter metabolism and autonomic activities.
Indian JPhysiolPharmacol 1994;38:133‑7. 10. Telles S, Nagarathna R, Nagendra HR. Physiological measures of right nostril breathing. J Altern Complement Med1996;2:479‑84. 11. RaghurajP, TellesS. Immediate effect of specific nostril manipulating yoga breathing practices on autonomic and respiratory variables. ApplPsychophysiolBiofeedback2008;13:65‑75. 12. Bhavanani AB, Ramanathan M, Balaji R, Pushpa D. Differential effects of uninostril and alternate nostril pranayamas on cardiovascular parameters and reaction time. Int J Yoga 2014;711:60‑5. 13. Bernardi L, Gabutti A, Porta C, Spicuzza L. Slow breathing reduces chemoreflex response to hypoxia and hypercapnia, and increases baroreflex sensitivity. J Hypertens 2001;19:2221–9. 14. Bhagat OL, Kharya C, Jaryal A, Deepak KK. Acute effects on cardiovascular oscillations during controlled slow yogic breathing. Indian J Med Res 2017;1‑45:503‑12. 15. Malhotra V, Bharshankar R, Ravi N, Bhagat OL. Acute effects on heart rate variability during slow deep breathing. Mymensingh Med J 2021;30:208‑13. 16. Shannahoff‑Khalsa DS, Boyle MR, Buebel ME. The effects of unilateral force nostril breathing on cognition. Int JNeurosci1991;57:239‑49. 17. Werntz DA, Bickford RG, Shannahoff‑Khalsa D. Selective hemispheric stimulation by unilateral forced nostril breathing. Hum Neurobiol1987;6:165‑71. 18. Singh K, Bhargav H, Srinivasan TM. Effect of uninostril yoga breathing on brain hemo dynamics: A functional near infrared spectroscopy study. Int J Yoga2016;9:12‑9. 19. Telles S, Raghuraj P, Maharana S, Nagendra HR. Immediate effect of three yoga breathing techniques on performance on a letter‑cancellation task. PerceptMot Skills2007;104:1289‑96. 20. Naveen KV, Nagarathna R, Nagendra HR, Telles S. Yoga breathing through a particular nostril increases spatial memory scores without lateralized effects. Psychol Rep1997;81:555‑61. 21. Raghuraj P, Telles S. Right uninostril yoga breathing influences ipsilateral components of middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Neurol Sci2004;25:274‑80. 22. Polich J. P300 in Clinical Applications. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Field. Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg; 1999. 23. Telles S, Verma S, Sharma SK, GuptaRK, Balkrishna A. Alternate‑nostril yoga breathing reduced blood pressure while increasing performance in a vigilance test. Med SciMonit Basic Res2017;23:392‑8. 24. Telles S, Vishwakarma B, GuptaRK, Balkrishna A. Changes in shape and size discrimi nation and state anxiety after alternate‑nostril yoga breathing and breath awareness in one session each. Med SciMonit Basic Res2019;25:121‑7. 25. Garg R, Malhotra V, Tripathi Y, Agarawal R. Effect of left, right and alternate nostril breathing on verbal and spatial memory. J ClinDiagn Res 2016;10:CC01‑3. 26. Balaji PA, Varne SR, Ali SS. Physiological effects of yogic practices and transcendental meditation in health and disease. N Am J Med Sci 2012;4:442‑8. 27. Pal GK, Agarwal A, Karthik S, Pal P, Nanda N. Slow yogic breathing through right and left nostril influences sympathovagal balance, heart rate variability, and cardiovascular risks in young adults. N Am J Med Sci 2014;6:145‑51. 28. Sohail N. Stress and academic performance among medical students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak2013;23:67‑71. 29. Pal GK, Pal P, Nanda N, Amudharaj D, Adithan C. Cardiovascular dysfunctions and sympathovagal imbalance in hypertension and prehypertension: Physiological perspectives.Future Cardiol2013;9:53‑69.
