Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Varun Malhotra 1
- . Ragini Srivastava 1
- . Poovarasan Parasuraman 1
- . Danish Javed 2
- . Santosh Wakode 1
- . Avinash Thakare 1
- . Ananyan Sampath 3
- . Ankita Kumari 3
1 Department of Physiology, AIIMS, Bhopal, India
2 AYUSH, AIIMS, Bhopal, India
3 Undergraduate MBBS Students, AIIMS, Bhopal, India
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ancient Indian science of Yoga makes use of voluntary regulation of breathing
to make respiration rhythmic and calm the mind. This practice is called pranayama. Nadisuddhi
pranayama means “purification of subtle energy paths,” inhalation and exhalation are through
alternative nostrils for successive respiratory cycles. Surya Anuloma‑Viloma pranayama means “heat
generating breathing particle” when the respiratory cycle of inhalation and exhalation is completed
through the right nostril exclusively. When completed through the left nostril alone, the practice is
called “Chandra Anuloma‑Viloma pranayama,” which means a heat‑dissipating or cooling liberating
practice. We compared the effect of right nostril breathing (RNA) and left nostril breathing (LNB)
pranayama on heart rate variability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at the Department of Physiology at an institute
of national importance, after obtaining necessary ethical approvals from the Institutional Ethics Committee.
Twenty healthy kriya yogi volunteers (mean age: 44 years), who are regular practitioners for the last
10–20 years, were inducted into the study. RNB pranayama starts with closing the right nostril with the
thumb of the left hand followed by exhalation through the right nostril and inhaling slowly through the
same nostril. This forms one round of RNB pranayama. In contrast, inhalation through the left nostril and
exhalation through the right nostril exclusively is called chandrabhedana pranayama (chandrabhedana
means moon‑piercing breath in Sanskrit) with a similar variation called Chandra Anuloma‑Viloma
pranayama in which inhalation, as well as exhalation, is performed through the left nostril exclusively. The
recording of electrocardiogram (ECG) for heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was taken by heart rate
variability (Dinamika HRV‑Advanced Heart Rate Variability Test System, Moscow, Russia). The resting
and during readings of heart rate variability parameters were compared and post hoc analysis was done
using Bonferroni and Holm multiple comparisons for repeated measures.
RESULTS: Time domain parameters: Standard deviation of normal to normal RR intervals (SDNN)
and root mean square of successive NN interval differences (RMSSD) were increased at a high level
of statistical significance during both pranayama maneuvres. Frequency domain parameters: LF, LF/
HF ratio increased significantly. Parasympathetic activity is represented by LF when the respiration
rate is lower than 7 breaths per min or during taking a deep breath. Thus, when the subject is in a
state of relaxation with slow and even breathing in both RNB—right nostril and Chandra—LNB, the
LF values can be very high, indicating an increase in parasympathetic activity rather than an increase
in sympathetic regulation.
CONCLUSION: Our study is an acute study, where changes in HRV were seen after 5 min of RNB
and LNB. However, statistically, there is not much difference in the immediate effects of the two
pranayamas on heart rate variability in regular yoga practitioners.
Keywords
- Sri ParamhansaYogananda. Shiv Swarodaya With Arjuna. The
Bhagavad Gita Royal Science of God‑Realization. The immortal
dialogue between soul and spirit. A new translation and
commentary 2002: Chapter IV Verse 29.p. 496‑507.
2. Backon J. Changes in blood glucose levels induced by
different forced nostril breathing, a technique which effects
brain hemi‑sphericity and autonomic activity. Med Sci Res
1988;16:1197‑9.
3. Bhargava R, Gogate MG, MascarchasJF. Autonomic responses to
breath holding and its variations following pranayama. Indian J
Pharmacol 1988; 32:257‑64.
4. Stoksted P. The physiologic cycle of the nose under normal and
pathologic conditions. Acta Otolaryngol 1952;42:175‑9.
5. Keuning J. On the nasal cycle. J Int Rhinol 1968;6:99‑135.
6. Muktibobhananda S. SwaraYoga. Yoga Publications Trust; 1999.
7. Swarodaya S. Chapter V. Verses 102‑113, Verses 114‑123, Verse
130.
8. McCraty R, Shaffer F. Heart rate variability: New perspectives on
physiological mechanisms, assessment of self‑regulatory capacity,
and health risk. Glob Adv Health Med 2015;4:46‑61.
9. Telles S, Nagarathna R, Nagendra HR. Breathing through a
particular nostril can alter metabolism and autonomic activities. - Indian JPhysiolPharmacol 1994;38:133‑7.
10. Telles S, Nagarathna R, Nagendra HR. Physiological measures of
right nostril breathing. J Altern Complement Med1996;2:479‑84.
11. RaghurajP, TellesS. Immediate effect of specific nostril manipulating
yoga breathing practices on autonomic and respiratory variables.
ApplPsychophysiolBiofeedback2008;13:65‑75.
12. Bhavanani AB, Ramanathan M, Balaji R, Pushpa D. Differential
effects of uninostril and alternate nostril pranayamas on
cardiovascular parameters and reaction time. Int J Yoga
2014;711:60‑5.
13. Bernardi L, Gabutti A, Porta C, Spicuzza L. Slow breathing reduces
chemoreflex response to hypoxia and hypercapnia, and increases
baroreflex sensitivity. J Hypertens 2001;19:2221–9.
14. Bhagat OL, Kharya C, Jaryal A, Deepak KK. Acute effects
on cardiovascular oscillations during controlled slow yogic
breathing. Indian J Med Res 2017;1‑45:503‑12.
15. Malhotra V, Bharshankar R, Ravi N, Bhagat OL. Acute effects on
heart rate variability during slow deep breathing. Mymensingh
Med J 2021;30:208‑13.
16. Shannahoff‑Khalsa DS, Boyle MR, Buebel ME. The effects
of unilateral force nostril breathing on cognition. Int
JNeurosci1991;57:239‑49.
17. Werntz DA, Bickford RG, Shannahoff‑Khalsa D. Selective
hemispheric stimulation by unilateral forced nostril breathing.
Hum Neurobiol1987;6:165‑71.
18. Singh K, Bhargav H, Srinivasan TM. Effect of uninostril yoga
breathing on brain hemo dynamics: A functional near infrared
spectroscopy study. Int J Yoga2016;9:12‑9.
19. Telles S, Raghuraj P, Maharana S, Nagendra HR. Immediate
effect of three yoga breathing techniques on performance on a
letter‑cancellation task. PerceptMot Skills2007;104:1289‑96.
20. Naveen KV, Nagarathna R, Nagendra HR, Telles S. Yoga
breathing through a particular nostril increases spatial memory
scores without lateralized effects. Psychol Rep1997;81:555‑61.
21. Raghuraj P, Telles S. Right uninostril yoga breathing influences
ipsilateral components of middle latency auditory evoked
potentials. Neurol Sci2004;25:274‑80.
22. Polich J. P300 in Clinical Applications. Electroencephalography:
Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Field.
Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg; 1999.
23. Telles S, Verma S, Sharma SK, GuptaRK, Balkrishna A.
Alternate‑nostril yoga breathing reduced blood pressure while
increasing performance in a vigilance test. Med SciMonit Basic
Res2017;23:392‑8.
24. Telles S, Vishwakarma B, GuptaRK, Balkrishna A. Changes
in shape and size discrimi nation and state anxiety after
alternate‑nostril yoga breathing and breath awareness in one
session each. Med SciMonit Basic Res2019;25:121‑7.
25. Garg R, Malhotra V, Tripathi Y, Agarawal R. Effect of left, right
and alternate nostril breathing on verbal and spatial memory.
J ClinDiagn Res 2016;10:CC01‑3.
26. Balaji PA, Varne SR, Ali SS. Physiological effects of yogic practices
and transcendental meditation in health and disease. N Am J Med
Sci 2012;4:442‑8.
27. Pal GK, Agarwal A, Karthik S, Pal P, Nanda N. Slow yogic
breathing through right and left nostril influences sympathovagal
balance, heart rate variability, and cardiovascular risks in young
adults. N Am J Med Sci 2014;6:145‑51.
28. Sohail N. Stress and academic performance among medical
students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak2013;23:67‑71.
29. Pal GK, Pal P, Nanda N, Amudharaj D, Adithan C. Cardiovascular
dysfunctions and sympathovagal imbalance in hypertension
and prehypertension: Physiological perspectives.Future
Cardiol2013;9:53‑69.