Document Type : Original Article



BACKGROUND: Augmented reality (AR) is capable of facilitating constructive learning through the
provision of a learner‑centered environment, making for more flexible learning and providing a more
distinct experience of learning. AR technology has a significant influence on the teaching approach
provided to students with learning disabilities, particularly on their level of self‑regulation, and this
premise is what motivated the present study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research is a quasi‑experimental study that adopted a pre‑ and
post‑test control group design, involving 24 students who have disabilities. The students were divided
into AR group and control group, and data were then exposed to the descriptive statistics and paired
sample t test.
RESULTS: The results showed that AR technology has a significant effect on the enhancement of
the self‑regulation of students with learning disabilities.
CONCLUSION: The study indicated a significant effect of AR app on the self-regulation skills
of students. The study, therefore, encouraged decision academicians to implement technology
approaches in the disability setting.


1. Kellems R, Eichelberger C, Cacciatore G, Jensen M, Frazier B,
Simons K, et al. Using video‑based instruction via augmented
reality to teach mathematics to middle school students with
learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 2020;53: 277‑91.
2. Savelsbergh E, Prins G, Rietbergen C, Fechner S, Vaessen B,
Draijer J, et al. Effects of innovative science and mathematics
teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta‑analytic
study. Educ Res Rev 2016;19:158‑72.
3. Kellems R, Cacciatore G, Osborne K. Using an augmented
reality‑based teaching strategy to teach mathematics to secondary
students with disabilities. Career Dev Transit Except Individ
2019;42: 164-182.
4. Yot‑Dominguez C, Marcelo C. University students’ self‑regulated
learning using digital technologies. Int J Educ Technol High Educ
5. Azuma R. A survey of augmented relaity. Presence: Teleoperators
Virtual Environment 1997;6:355‑85.
6. Jdaitawi M. A decade of research on the effectievness of
augmented relaity on students with special disability in higher
education. Contemp Educ Technol 2022;14:1. https://doi.
7. Bridges S, Robinson O, Stewart E, Kwon D, Mutua K. Augmented
reality: Teaching daily living skills to adult with intellectual
disabilities. J Spec Educ Technol 2020;35:3‑14.
8. Akcayir M, Akcayir G. Advantages and challenege associated
with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of
the literature. Educ Res Rev 2017;20:1‑11.
9. Cheng S, Lai C. Facilitating learning for students with special
needs: A review of technology‑supported special education
studies. Comput Educ J 2020;7:131‑53.
10. Marlina M. Increasing self‑regulated learning of students with
e needs through the ILBAWEL model. J ICSAR 2017;1. DOI:
11. Hrishikesh N, Nair J. Interactive learning system for the hearing
impaired and the vocally challenged. Paper Presneted in
2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing,
Communications and Informatics, ICACCI 2016 (Jaipur).
12. Mohd A, Sarojini E, Low W, Ab‑Aziz K. Teachers perception of
mobile edutainment for special needs learners: The Malaysian
case. Int J Incl Educ 2014;18:1237‑46.
13. Fombona J, Pascual‑Sevillano M, González‑Videgaray M.
M‑learning and augmented reality: A review of the scientific
literature on the WoS repository. Comunicar 2017;25:63‑71.
14. Rega A, Mennitto A. Augumented reality as an educational
and rehabilitation support for developmental dyslexia. Paper
Presented at the 10th Annual International Conference of
Education, Research and Innovation. 2007.
15. Tsinak A, Karama P. Augmented reality and dyslexia: A new
approach in teaching students 2017. Retrieved from: https://
16. Akçayir M, Akçayir G, Pektas H, Ocak M. Augmented
reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality
on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward
science laboratories. Comput Hum Behav 2016, 57:334‑342.
17. Creswell J. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and
Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston, MA:
Pearson; 2012.
18. Ruban L, McCoach B, McGuire J, Reis S. The differential impact
of academic self‑regulatory methods on academic achievement
among university students with and without learning disabilities.
J Learn Disabil 2003;36:270‑86.
19. Di‑Serio A, Ibanez M, Kloos C. Impact of an augmented reality
system on students motivation for a visual art course. Comput
Educ 2013;68:586‑96.
20. Cakir R, Korkmaz O. The effectiveness of augmented reality
environments on individuals with special education needs. Educ
Inf Technol 2019;24:1631‑59.
21. Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R. Insights into the factors influencing
student motivation in AR learning experiences in vocational
education and training. Front Psychol 2018;9:1486.
22. Radu I. Augmented reality in education: A meta‑review and
cross‑media analysis. Pers Ubiquit Comput 2014;18:1533‑43.
23. Cunha P, Brandao J, Vasconcelos J, Soares F ,
Carvalho V. Augmented reality for cognitive and social skills
improvement in children with ASD. In: Remote Engineering
and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), 2016 13th International
Conference on (p. 334‑35). IEEE computer society:
Washington: USA.
24. Quintero J, Baldiris S, Rubira R, Ceron J, Velez G. Augemented
reality in educational inclusion. A systematic review on the last
decades. Front Psychol 2019;10:1835.
25. Karimi N, Saadat‑Gharin S, Tol A, Sadeghi R, Yaseri M,
Mohebbi B. A problem‑based learning health literacy intervention program on improving health‑promoting behaviors among girl
students. J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:251.
26. Davari FV, Teymouri F, Amoli HA, Mojtabavi H, Sharifi A,
Alaeddini F, et al. Problem‑based learning as an effective method
for teaching theoritcal surgery courses to medical stduents. J Edu
Health Promot 2021;10:477.