Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Zeinab Abdelaziz Kasemy
- . Ibrahim Kabbash 1
- . Dalia Desouky
- . Shaimaa Abd El‑Raouf
- . Samar Aloshari 2
- . Ghadeer El Sheikh
1 Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tanta, Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt
2 Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate how medical students perceive their educational
environment, as well as the implications of motivation, learning strategies, and the factor of emotional
intelligence on academic achievement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross‑sectional study, 3384 undergraduate students were
recruited from randomly selected Egyptian medical colleges. Students from second to final year, taking
fundamental and clinical courses and, at a minimum, three professional exams, were enrolled and
subjected to the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure scale, the Motivated Strategies
for Learning Questionnaire, and Emotional intelligence questionnaire.
RESULTS: The overall mean age of the studied students was 21.42 ± 1.61 years. Females
represented 63.5%, rural residents were 52.2% and students with enough income represented 88.0%.
The traditional system adopted 28.4% of the students versus 71.6% in the integrated system. Linear
regression using path analysis was conducted to study the predictors of academic achievement, and
it revealed that motivation was the highly significant predictor of academic achievement (β = 2.68,
CI95%:2.35–3.05, P < 0.001), followed by learning (β = 1.09, CI95%:0.80–1.41, P < 0.001), emotional
intelligence (β = 0.92, CI95%:0.87–0.97, P < 0.001), and the educational environment (β = 0.14,
CI95%:0.13–0.15, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The study’s findings have implications for medical educators trying to understand the
personal factors that influence learning and performance in medical school. Students’ motivation was
the highly significant predictor of academic achievement followed by learning, emotional intelligence,
and educational environment. Perception of the learning environment had improved because of
the integrated student‑centered system, which fosters motivation and emotional intelligence. To
improve learners’ EI, optimal learning, and educational outcomes, the EI components can be taught
and fostered.
Keywords
R I 2005;88:258‑61.
2. Huber MT, Hutchings P. Integrative Learning: Mapping the
Terrain. The Academy in Transition. 2nd ed. Washington, DC:
Association of American Colleges and Universities; 2009.
3. Dent J, Harden RM, Hun D. A Practical Guide for Medical
Teachers. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier Health Sciences.
London, New York, Oxford, Philadelphia, St. Louis Sydney,
Toronto: Medical CD Center Co. Ltd 9., Elsevier Limited; 2013.
4. Badrawi N, HosnI S, Rashwan M. National Academic Reference
Standards (NARS): Medical(Draft). 2017. Available from: https://
med.sohag‑univ.edu.eg/main/wp‑content/uploads/2020/02/
NARS.pdf.
5. Abdelaziz A, Kassab SE, Abdelnasser A, Hosny S. Medical
education in Egypt: Historical background, current status, and
challenges. Health Prof Educ 2018;4:236‑44.
6. Warger T, EduServe, Dobbin G. Learning environments: Where
space, technology and culture converge. 2009. Available from:
http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EL13021.pdf. [Last
accessed on 2015 Jul 15].
7. Genn JM. Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change
in medical education: A unifying perspective. In: Genn JM,
editor. Curriculum, Environment, Climate, Quality and Change
in Medical Education: A Unifying Perspective. AMEE Education
Guide No 23. Dundee: Associated for Medical Education in
Europe; 2000. p. 7‑28.
8. Pimparyon P, Caleer MS, Pemba S, Roff S. Educational
environment, student approaches to learning and academic
achievement in a Thai nursing school. Med Teach
2010;22:359‑64.
9. Roff S, McAleer S, Harden RM, Al‑Qahtani M, Ahmed AU,
Deza H, et al. Development and validation of the Dundee
ready education environment measure (DREEM). Med Teach
1997;19:295‑9.
10. Chang KKP, Wong FKY, Chan KL, Wong F, Ho HC, Wong MS, et al. The impact of the environment on the quality of life and
the mediating effects of sleep and stress. Int J Environ Res Public
Health 2020;17:8529‑46.
11. Khalil MK, Elkhider IA. Applying learning theories and
instructional design models for effective instruction. Adv Physiol
Educ 2016;40:147‑56.
12. Oxford RL. Language learning styles and strategies: An overview.
GALA 2003;1-25.
13. Alfian A. The favored language learning strategies of Islamic
University EFL learners. Stud English Lang Educ 2021;8:47‑64.
14. Thiptanamanee P, Ussahawanitchakit P. Learning orientation,
emotional intelligence and job success: An empirical research
of automobile industry in Thailand. Business Manag Rev
2016;7:212‑9.
15. Drigas AS, Papoutsi C. A new layered model on emotional
intelligence. Behav Sci (Basel) 2018;8:45‑62.
16. Arora S, Ashrafian H, Davis R, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Sevdalis N.
Emotional intelligence in medicine: A systematic review
through the context of the ACGME competencies. Med Educ
2010;44:749‑64.
17. Pintrich PR. A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for
learning questionnaire (MSLQ). 1991. Available from: https://
files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf. [Last accessed on
2021 Jun 28].
18. Bayraktar O, Şencan H, Fidan Y. Impact of the trait‑based
emotional intelligence on self‑esteem factor according to gender
factor. Bus Manag Stud Int J 2018;6:361‑89.
19. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for
the process of cross‑cultural adaptation of self‑report measures.
Spine 2000;25:3186‑91.
20. Ahmed Y, Taha MH, Al‑Neel S, Gaffar AM. Students’ perception
of the learning environment and its relation to their study year
and performance in Sudan. Int J Med Educ 2018;9:145‑50.
21. Ahn Y, Hu W. Evaluation of the educational environment
at a graduate medical school in South Korea using the
DREEM questionnaire. MedEdPublish 2019. doi: 10.15694/
mep. 2019.000111.1.
22. Al‑Qahtani MF. Associations between approaches to study, the
learning environment, and academic achievement. J Taibah Univ
Med Sci 2015;10:56‑65.
23. Park KH, Park JH, Kim S, Rhee JA, Kim JH, Ahn YJ, et al. Students’
perception of the educational environment of medical schools in
Korea: Findings from a nationwide survey. Korean J Med Educ
2015;27:117‑30.
24. Ugusman A, Othman NA, Abdul Razak ZN, Soh MM,
Faizul PNAK, Ibrahim SF. Assessment of learning environment
among first year Malaysian medical students. J Taibah Univ Med
Sci 2015;10:454‑60.
25. Baig AU, Ahmed SH, Rizvi M, Ilyas MA, Ahmed M,
Rehmani MS, et al. Comparison of educational environment
perception of Dow Medical College students with CGPA. Int J
Res 2015;2:72‑9.
26. Finn Y, Avalos G, Dunne F. Positive changes in the medical
educational environment following introduction of a new
systems‑based curriculum: DREEM or reality? Curricular change
and the environment. Ir J Med Sci 2014;183:253‑8.
27. Zawawi AH, Elzubeir M. Using DREEM to compare graduating
student’s perceptions of learning environments at medical
schools adopting contrasting educational strategies. Med Teach
2012;34:S25‑31.
28. Walankar P, Panhale V, Situt S. Students’ perception of the
educational environment in an Indian physiotherapy college.
Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract 2019;26:17‑9.
29. Shrestha E, Mehta RS, Mandal G, Chaudhary K, Pradhan N.
Perception of the learning environment among the students in a
nursing college in Eastern Nepal. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:382‑9.
30. Palmgren PJ, Lindquist I, Sundberg T, Nilsson GH, Laksov KB,
et al. Exploring perceptions of the educational environment
among undergraduate physio‑therapy students. Int J Med Educ
2014;5:135‑46.
31. Youssef WT, Wazir YME, Ghaly MS, Khadragy RA. Evaluation of
the learning environment at the faculty of medicine, Suez Canal
University: Students’ perceptions. Intel Prop Rights 2013;1:1‑7.
32. Rahman NIA, Aziz AA, Zulkifli Z, Haj MA, Mohd Nasir FH,
Pergalathan S, et al. Perceptions of students in different phases
of medical education of the educational environment: Universiti
Sultan Zainal Abidin. Adv Med Educ Pract 2015;6:211‑22.
33. keda Y, Kubota Y, Hiraide A. Relationship between evaluation
of the teaching environment using DREEM scores and students’
school learning scores. MedEdPublish 2019;8:1‑13. doi: 10.15694/
mep. 2019.000013.1.
34. Karim J, Al‑Halabi B, Marwan Y, Sadeq H, Dawas A,
Al‑Abdulrazzaq D. The educational environment of the
undergraduate medical curriculum at Kuwait University. Adv
Med Educ Pract 2015;6:297‑303.
35. Austin EJ, Evans P, Magnus B, O’Hanlon K. A preliminary study
of empathy, emotional intelligence, and examination performance
in MBChB students. Med Educ 2007;41:684‑9.
36. Haralur SB, Majeed MI, Afzal M, Chaturvedi S. Association
of sociodemographic factors and emotional intelligence with
academic performance in clinical and preclinical dental courses.
Niger J Clin Pract 2019;22:1109‑14.
37. Altwijri S, Alotaibi A, Alsaeed M, Alsalim A, Alatiq A,
Al‑Sarheed S, et al. Emotional intelligence and its association with
academic success and performance in medical students. Saudi J
Med Med Sci 2021;9:31‑7.
38. Wijekoon CN, Amaratunge H, de Silva Y, Jayawardane P,
Senarath U. Emotional intelligence and academic performance
of medical undergraduates: A cross sectional study in a selected
university in Sri Lanka. BMC Med Educ 2017;17:176‑87.
39. Orsinia CD, Binnieb VI, Fuentesc F, Ledezma P, Jerez O.
Implications of motivation differences in preclinical‑clinical
transition of dental students: A one‑year follow‑up study. Educ
Med 2016;17:193‑6.
40. Ahmad J, Anwar M, Anwar A, Bareech K. A co relational study
of intelligence and academic achievement of students from
government schools of Peshawar district. PUTAJ Humanit Soc
Sci 2014;21:107‑15.
41. Preeti B. Role of emotional intelligence for academic achievement
for students. Res J Educ Sci 2013;1:8‑12.
42. Imran N, AwaisM, Haider II, Farhat A. Educating tomorrow’s
doctors: A cross sectional survey of emotional intelligence
and empathy in medical students of Lahore. Pak J Med Sci
2013;29:710‑4.
43. Valiente C, Swanson J, Eisenberg N. Linking students’ emotions
and academic achievement: When and why emotions matter.
Child Dev Perspect 2012;6:129‑35.
44. Liu Y, Hou S. Potential reciprocal relationship between
motivation and achievement: A longitudinal study. Sch Psychol
Int 2017;2018:38‑55.
45. Al Khatib SA. Meta‑cognitive self‑regulated learning and
motivational beliefs as predictors of college students’ performance.
Int J Res Educ 2010;27:57‑72.
46. Charles G, Harriett PK. Student academic performance: The role
of motivation, strategies, and perceived factors hindering Liberian
junior and senior high school students learning. Educ Res Int
2017;2017:1‑11. doi: 10.1155/2017/1789084.
47. Nabizadeh S, Hajian S, Sheikhan Z, Rafiei F. Prediction of
academic achievement based on learning strategies and
outcome expectations among medical students. BMC Med Educ
2019;19:99‑110.
48. Hayat AA, Shateri K, Amini M, Shokrpour N. Relationships
between academic self‑efficacy, learning‑related emotions, and
metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: A structural equation model. BMC Med Educ
2020;20:76‑87.
49. Nakhostin GA, Moumenikia M. The study of relation between
self‑regulated learning strategies and motivation strategies for
learning with educational performance of students of Ardebil
Islamic Azad University. Curriculum Plan Knowl Res Educ Sci
2009;23:85‑100.
50. Philbin M, Meier E, Huffman S, Boverie P. A survey of gender
and learning styles. Sex Roles 1995;32:485‑4.
51. Kumar A, Puranik M, Sowmya K. Association between dental
students’emotional intelligence and academic performance:
A study at six dental colleges in India. J Dental Educ
2016;80:526‑32.
52. Aithal AP, Kumar N, Gunasegeran P, Sundaram SM, Rong LZ,
Prabhu SP. A survey based study of emotional intelligence as it
relates to gender and academic performance of medical students.
Educ Health (Abingdon) 2016;29:255‑8.
53. Sivrikaya AH. The relationship between academic motivation
and academic achievement of the students. Asian J Educ Train
2019;5:309‑5.