Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify the parents’ experience of moral education
to their children in secondary school and with a phenomenological method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants include parents of students who received a high score
after taking Dr. Lotfabadi’s moral development test and extracting the results. The students’ parents
consciously and satisfactorily participated in the semi‑structured interviews prepared for this purpose,
and the interviews continued until the saturation stage, so the final sample size was 22 participants.
The data obtained from the interview were then analyzed using the Van Menen method to discover
the meaning of the students “parents” experiences of moral education.
RESULTS: Findings were revealed in 5 main themes of social ethics, family ethics, individual ethics,
self‑care ethics, and environmental ethics and 15 sub‑themes.
CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this study, it seems that parents to pay more attention to
the components of social ethics, family ethics, individual‑human ethics, self‑care ethics, environmental
ethics to succeed in raising children with desirable moral development pay special attention to these
components to raise worthy children with desirable moral development.

Keywords

1. Bosliki H, AzarbayjaniM. Children’s moral development in family
and media conflicts. J Ext Ethics 2020;39:11‑40.
2. Zahiri R, Lafontaine D, Schmidt C, Holloway JD, Kitching IJ,
Mutanen M, et al. Relationships among the basal lineages of
Noctuidae (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea) based on eight gene
regions. Zool Scr 2013;42:488‑507.
3. Sarukhani B. Sociology of the Family. Tehran: Kayhan Publication;
1991. p. 77.
4. Nabavi SS. The role of family education in promoting parenting
skills. Payvand 2014;421:37‑4.
5. Mokhtari H. Children learn anxiety. Payvand Educ Mon
2014;421:33‑31.
6. Mousavi Asl SM, AzarbayjaniM, AlizadehSM, JahangirzadehMR,
Tabik MT. Psychology of Ethics. Qom: Research Center and
University; 2016.
7. Vojdani F, Imani M, Akbarian R, Sadegh Zadeh Qamsari A.
A conceptual analysis of the explanation method and its
application in moral education with emphasis on the interpretation
of Al‑Mizan. J Islam Educ 2013;8:191‑71.
8. Eisenberg N, Losya S. Emotional respon ding Regula Jion,
social correlates socialization. In: Salovey P, editor. Emotional
Development and Emotional Intelligence. New York: Basic Books;
1997. p. 129‑62.
9. Becker H, Epstein J. Parent involvement: A survey of teacher
practice. Elementtary Sch J 1993;83:85‑102.
10. Vincent C, Tom L. Hom‑school relationship: The swarming
of disciplinary mechanism? In: Ball SJ, editor. Sociology of
Education: Major Themes. London: Routledge Palmer; 2000.
11. Afrooz GA. All in the family all for the family. Payvand Educ
Month 2014;414:6‑3.
12. Berkowitz MW, Grych JH. Fostering goodness: Teaching
parents to facilitate children’s moral development. J Moral Educ
2006;27:371‑91.
13. Smetana JG. The role of parents in moral development: A social
domain analysis. J Moral Educ 2010;28:311‑21.
14. Hosseinipanah SA, Zendedelan A. Recognize and Analyze
Theories of Children’s Social Skills and Methods to Help
Develop Skills their Social Status in Child‑Related Environments.
International Conference on New Research in Civil Engineering,
Architecture and Urban Planning, Berlin; 2016.
15. Stepp G. Family and Relationships: Raising a Moral Child. Vision;
2013. Available from: http://www.vision.org/visionmedia/
child‑development‑core‑competencies‑moral‑system/67422.aspx.
16. Burnett N. In: Samuelsson IP, Kaga Y, editors. The Contribution
of Early Childhood Education to a Sustainable Society. Paris:
UNESCO; 2008.
17. Maccoby EE. The role of parents in the socialization of children:
An historical overview. Dev Psychol 1992;28:1006‑17.
18. Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research in Nursing:
Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. 2nd ed. Philadelphia:
Lippincott; 1999.
19. Van Manen M. Research lived Experience: Human Science for an
Action Sensitive Pedagogy. London, Ontario: State University of
Newyork Press; 1990.
20. Mousavi A, Valvi P, Hashemi SJ. A study of the living
experience of primary school teachers from teacher duties as a
philosopher‑teacher. JEDUS 2016;23:35‑56.
21. Lotfabadi H. Critique of the theories of moral development of
Piaget, Kohlberg and Bandura and presenting a new model for
research on the moral development of Iranian students. J Educ
Innov 2005;4: 104‑46.
22. Keshtiaray N, Vajargah KF, Zimitat C, Foroughi AA.
Phenomenological explanation of an experiential curriculum in
medical education: A feministic approach. J Educ Health Promot
2012;1:8.