Journal of Education and Health Promotion

Development of application‑based education model and prenatal yoga in reducing the occurrence of cesarean section (CS) delivery: Study protocol

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

. Ni M. Dewianti 1
. Stang 2
. Sukri Palutturi 3
. Masyita Muis 4
. I. Nyoman M. Karmaya 5
. Suriah 6

1 Polytechnic of Health Kartini Bali. Doctor Program, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia

2 Department of Reproduction Health, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia

3 Department of Administration Health Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia

4 Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia

5 Department of Anatomy and Physiology Faculty of Medicine Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia

6 Departement Promotion Section Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia

Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the last 20 years, the public health community has expressed concerns over
the unprecedented increase of cesarean section (CS) delivery. Rising global concerns over this
escalation that has gone out of control should not be overseen. The purpose of this study is to
develop an application‑based education model and prenatal yoga to reduce the occurrence of
cesarean section (CS) delivery.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: This studywasan exploratory mixed methodsresearchthat consisted of
twostages: stage 1, which wasa qualitative study on model formulation through in‑depth interviews
and forum group discussions (FGDs); and stage 2, which aimed to test whether the formulated model
was effective in reducing the occurrence of cesarean section delivery.
CONCLUSION: The result of this study wasused todevelop an application‑based education model,
which wascombined with prenatal yoga, to reduce the occurrence of cesarean section delivery.

Keywords

Application‑based education
cesarean section
prenatal yoga
pregnancy
  1. FitrianiM, BustanMN, SalmahU, StangSM. Analysis of risk factors
    maternal mortality in Sinjai district.Indian J Public Heal Res Dev
    2019;10:1503‑7.
    2. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R,
    Deneux‑Tharaux C, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean
    section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic
    studies. Reprod Health 2015;12. doi: 10.1186/s12978‑015‑0043‑6.
    3. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR.
    The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional
    and national estimates: 1990‑2014.PLoS One 2016;11:1‑12. doi:
    10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.
    4. Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS,
    et al. Short‑term and long‑term effects of caesarean section on
    the health of women and children. Lancet 2018;392:1349‑57. doi:
    10.1016/S0140‑6736(18) 31930‑5.
    5. McLachlan HL, ForsterDA, DaveyMA, FarrellT, GoldL, BiroMA,
    et al. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload
    midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric
    risk: The COSMOS randomised controlled trial.BJOG An Int J
    Obstet Gynaecol 2012;119:1483‑92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471‑0528.201
    2.03446.x.
    6. RydahlE, Declercq E, Juhl M, Maimburg RD. Cesarean section
    on a rise—Does advanced maternal age explain the increase?
    A population register‑based study.PLoS One 2019;14:1‑16. doi:
    10.1371/journal.pone.0210655.
    7. Afshar Y, Wang ET, Mei J, Esakoff TF, Pisarska MD, Gregory KD.
    Childbirth education class and birth plans are associated with a
    vaginal delivery. Birth 2017;44:29‑34.
    8. Curran EA, O’Neill SM, Cryan JF, Kenny LC, Dinan TG,
    Khashan AS, et al.Research review: Birth by caesarean section and
    development of autism spectrum disorder and attention‑deficit/
    hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.J
    Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 2015;56:500‑8.
    9. Costa‑Ramón AM, Rodríguez‑González A, Serra‑Burriel M,
    Campillo‑Artero C. It’s about time: Cesarean sections and
    neonatal health. J Health Econ 2018;59:46‑59.
    10. Sanavi FS, Ansari‑Moghaddam A, Shovey MF, Rakhshani F.
    Effective education to decrease elective caesarean section.J Pak
    Med Assoc 2014;64:500‑5.
    11. Fenwick J, Toohill J, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Buist A, Turkstra E,
    et al. Effects of a midwife psycho‑education intervention to reduce
    childbirth fear on women’s birth outcomes and postpartum
    psychological wellbeing. BMC Pregnancy Child birth 2015;15:1‑8.
    doi: 10.1186/s12884‑015‑0721‑y.
    12. Opiyo N, Kingdon C, Oladapo OT, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Bonet M,
    et al. Non‑clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean
    sections: Who recommendations. Bull World Health Organ
    2020;98:66‑8.
    13. Dinas Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Riset Kesehatan Dasar.
    Diabetes Mellit 2013;87-90.
    14. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan, Laporan Provinsi
    Bali Riskesdas. 2019.
    15. Profile Kesehatan Provinsi Bali. ‘Profile Kesehatan Provinsi Bali’,
    Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Perawatan Ortodontik Yang
    Dilakukan Oleh Pihak Non Profesional 2019;53:1689-99.
    16. Sayekti WN, Syarif S, Ahmad M, Nurkhayati E, Suciati S. Media
    Edukasi Tanda Bahaya Kehamilan Berbasis Android Untuk
    Meningkatkan Pengetahuan Ibu Hamil. 2020.
    17. Betrán AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N,
    Torloni MR, et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean
    sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet 2018;392:1358‑68.
    18. Begum T, Rahman A, Nababan H, Hoque DME, Khan AF, Ali T,
    et al. Indications and determinants of caesarean section delivery:
    Evidence from a population‑based study in Matlab, Bangladesh.
    PLoS One12:1‑16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188074.
    19. Iravani M, Zarean E, Janghorbani M, Bahrami M. Women’s needs
    and expectations during normal labor and delivery.J Educ Health
    Promot 2015;4:6. doi: 10.4103/2277‑9531.151885.
    20. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO
    statement on caesarean section rates.BJOG2016;123:667‑70.doi:
    10.1111/1471‑0528.13526.
    21. Gama SG, Viellas EF, Schilithz AO, Theme Filha MM,
    Carvalho ML, Gomes KR, et al.Factors associated with caesarean
    section among primiparous adolescents in Brazil, 2011‑2012.
    CadSaude Publica2014;30:S1‑11. doi: 10.1590/0102‑311X00145513.
    22. Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention
    of the primary cesarean delivery This document was developed
    jointly by the with the assistance of.Am J Obstet Gynecol
    2014;210:179‑93.
    23. Sihombing N, Saptarini I, Sisca D, Putri K. Determinan Persalinan
    Sectio Caesarea Di Indonesia. Kesehatan Reproduksi 2017;8:63‑75.
  2. doi: 10.22435/kespro.v8i1.6641.63-75.
    24. Bolanthakodi C, Raghunandan C, Saili A, Mondal S, Saxena P.
    Prenatal yoga: Effects on alleviation of labor pain and birth
    outcomes.J Altern Complement Med2018;2412:1181‑8.
    25. SharifiradG, MirkarimiK, HassanzadehA, ShahnaziH, SabootehS.
    The impact of education intervention on the health belief model
    constructs regarding anxiety of nulliparous pregnant women.J
    Educ Health Promot 2015;4:27.doi: 10.4103/2277‑9531.154120.
    26. Jahdi F, Sheikhan F, Haghani H, Sharifi B, Ghaseminejad A,
    Khodarahmian M, et al. Yoga during pregnancy: The effects on
    labor pain and delivery outcomes (A randomized controlled
    trial). Complement Ther Clin Pract 2017;27:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.
    ctcp.2016.12.002.
    27. Ulfa M, Stang, Tahir AM, Mallongi A, Rachmat M. Effect of
    education media on improvement visual acetate acid inspection
    at Sudiang community health center. Enferm Clin 2020;30:439‑43.
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Volume 12, Issue 10
November 2022
Pages 1-5

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us