Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Health Management and Economics Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Disciplinary-based information literacy (DIL) or professional-related information
literacy has not been widely studied in the academic context, including medical sciences. This study
aimed at investigating the status of DIL among medical students in an Iranian medical university.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional survey. A random sample consisting
of 298 students majoring in general medicine at Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran,
in the academic year of 2018–2019 completed a valid and reliable 20-item questionnaire on DIL.
Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software.
RESULTS: Participants’ DIL was less than expected, especially in the skills related to professional
information access and evaluation. The majority of them had low DIL level. However, medical students
in their last 2 years of study had significantly high scores in DIL than those in their first 2 years of study.
CONCLUSION: Information literacy has not been seriously considered in health-related higher
education in Iran. It is needed to consider DIL in the medical curriculum for training students to be
proficient specialists in medical practice.

Keywords

1. Mackey TP, Jacobson TE. Reframing information literacy as a
metaliteracy. Coll Res Lib 2011;72:62-78.
2. Bruce CS. Information literacy as a catalyst for educational
change. A background paper. In: Danaher PA, editor. Lifelong
Learning: Whose Responsibility and What is Your Contribution?,
The 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference. Yeppoon,
Queensland: Central Queensland University Press; 2004. p. 8-19.
3. Bruce CS. Workplace experiences of information literacy. Int J Inf
Manag. 1999;1933-47.
4. Lau J. Guidelines on Information Literacy for Lifelong Learning;
2006. Available from: http://libcmass.unibit.bg/ifla-guidelinesen.pdf. [Last updated on 2020 Mar 30].
5. Libraries AoCaR. Information Literacy Competency Standards
for Higher Education; 2000. Available from: https://alair.ala.
org/handle/11213 / 7668. [Last updated on 2020 Mar 30].
6. Baro EE, Endouware BC, Ubogu JO. Information literacy among
medical students in the College of Health Sciences in Niger Delta
University, Nigeria. Program 2011;45:107-20.
7. Bazrafkan L, Hayat AA, Abbasi K, Bazrafkan A, Rohalamini A,
Fardid M. Evaluation of information literacy status among medical
students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. J Adv Med Educ
Prof 2017;5:42-8.
8. Farrell R, Badke W. Situating information literacy in the
disciplines: A practical and systematic approach for academic
librarians. Ref Serv Rev 2015;43:319-40.
9. University CS. Advanced Information Literacy Outcomes; 2016.
Available from: https://www.csueastbay.edu/faculty//senate/
files/docs/cic/cic-14-15/14-15-docs/14-15-cic-3-phys-3080-
area-b6.pdf. [Last updated on 2020 Mar 30].
10. Bruce C, Edwards S, Lupton M. Six frames for information
literacy education: A conceptual framework for interpreting the
relationships between theory and practice. Innov Teach Lean Inf
Comp Sci 2006;5:1-18.
11. Carroll AJ, Hallman SJ, Umstead KA, McCall J, DiMeo AJ. Using
information literacy to teach medical entrepreneurship and health
care economics. J Med Libr Assoc 2019;107:163-71.
12. Akpovire E, Olawoyin O, Adebayo O, Esse U. Role of information
literacy skills on use of information resources by medical students
in Lagos state. Lib Philos Pract 2019;2019:2148.
13. Mittermeyer D, Quirion D, Archambault C, Carrier P,
Grant S, Guilmette P, et al., editors. Information Literacy: Study of
Incoming First-Year Undergraduates in Quebec. Karen Nicholson,
M.A.: M.L.I.S.; 2003.
14. Beile P. Development and validation of the beile test of
information literacy for education (B-TILED). AREA Annual
Conference. Montreal, Canada; 2005.
15. Emde J, Emmett A. Assessing information literacy skills using
the ACRL standards as a guide. Ref Serv Rev 2007;35:210-29.
16. Abbasi A, Najafloo P. Assessment of information literacy of
agricultural postgraduate students at Tarbiat Modares University,
Iran. Res Agri Manag Educ 2015;34:89-103.
17. Sadeghi M, Taraghikhah N. The level of students’ information
literacy based on the information literacy standards for the higher
education students (ACRL). Libr Inf Sci Inf Technol 2016;8:1-18.
18. White AM. Information literacy and critical thinking in higher
education: Some considerations. Handbook of Research on
Critical Thinking and Teacher Education Pedagogy IGI Global;
2019. p. 367-81.
19. Virkus S. Information literacy in Europe: A literature review. Inf
Res 2003;8:159.
20. Brown C, Krumholz LR. Integrating information literacy into the
science curriculum. Coll Res Lib 2002;63:111-23.
21. Yevelson-Shorsher A, Bronstein J. Three perspectives on
information literacy in academia: Talking to librarians, faculty,
and students. Coll Res Lib. 2018;79:535-53.
22. Webber S. Information literacy in higher education. In: Stopar K,
Rabzeljl L, editors. Information Literacy between Theory and
Practice: The Role of Academic and Special Libraries. Ljubljana:
ZBDS; 2006. p. 9-20.