Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Researcher, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Financial information system is one of the subsystems in management information
system that is very important in health institutions. The use of financial information system creating
effective and efficient information flow will greatly assist the management in decision‑making, so that
it can achieve institutional goals easier. This study is endeavored to assess the success of financial
information system in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive‑correlational study was performed on the research
population consisting of financial information system users in educational, health, and medical
centers affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences during 2018 that were studied by the
census method (n = 108) because of a small number of these users. The data were collected using
a questionnaire. The content validity of questionnaire was confirmed by pooling the ideas of five
academic members of the health information management and two financial information system
users. The reliability of questionnaire was also estimated by Cronbach’s alpha. Then, the AMOS
software was used to analyze the gathered data.
RESULTS: The result shows that system quality was positively correlated to the use and user
satisfaction whereas use and user satisfaction was positively correlated to net benefit (P < 0.05).
Furthermore, the information quality was positively correlated to the user satisfaction (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: As per the finding of this study, to improve user’s intention to use the financial
information system and their satisfaction toward the system, managers need to develop useful,
easy‑to‑understand, easy‑to‑learn, and easy‑to‑use information systems.
Keywords
- Ibrahim R, Auliaputra B, Rasimah C, Maarop N. Measuring the
success of healthcare information system in Malaysia: A case
study. IOSR J Bus Manage 2016;18 (4):100‑6.
2. Nurul I, Alina S. Adoption of hospital information
systems in Malaysian public hospitals. Proc Soc Behav Sci
2015;172 (1):336‑43.
3. Salehi M, Abdipoure A. A study of the barriers of implementation
of accounting information system: Case of listed in companies in
Tehran stock exchange. J Econ Behav Stud 2012;2 (2):75‑85.
4. Heleen A, Ten K. Impact of user competency on accounting
information system success: Banking sector in Sri Lanka. Int J
Econ Finan Issues 2018;8 (6):167‑75.
5. Uzunboylu H, Abishov N, Asan D, Kanat A, Erikisheva Z.
Development of an automated information system university
management. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2014;143:550‑4.
6. Wager KA, Lee FW, GlaserJP. Managing Health Care Information
Systems: A Practical Approach for Health Care Executives. United
States of America: John Wiley Son; 2005. p. 94‑7.
7. Lagzian M, Nazemi S, Dadmand F. An evaluation of the adjusted
DeLone and McLean model of information systems success the
case of financial information system in Ferdowsi University of
Mashhad. J Inf Process Manage 2012;27 (3):577‑96.
8. DeloneWH, McleanER. Information system success measurement.
Found Trends Inf Syst 2016;2 (1):1‑116.
9. Delone WH, Mclean ER. Information systems success: A ten year
update. J Manage Inf Syst 2003;19 (4):9‑30.
10. Emawati A, Suprasto B. Measuring the success of
SIPKD in Denpasar city. Int J Soc Sci Curr Future Res Trends
2019;1 (1):1‑7.
11. OjoAI. Validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems
success model. Healthc Inform Res 2017;23 (1):60‑6.
12. Priskila R, Setyohadi DB, Santoso AJ, editors. An Investigation of
Factors Affecting the Success of Regional Financial Management
Information System (Case Study of Palangka Raya Government).
2018 International Seminar on Research of Information
Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI); 2018: IEEE - 13. Nugroho Y, Prasetyo A. Assessing information systems
success: A respecification of the DeLone and Mclean model
to integrating the perceived quality. Probl Perspect Manage
2018;16 (1):348‑60.
14. Seyal A. Preliminary investigation of measuring users satisfaction
and success of financial and accounting information system:
Bruneian perspective. Int J Bus Manage Rev 2016;3 (2):1‑22.
15. Uddin M, Ghosh A, Isaac O. Impact of the system information
and service quality of online learning on user satisfaction among
public universities students in Bangladesh. Int J Manage Hum Sci
2019;3 (2):1‑10.
16. Mardiana S, Tjakraatmadja JH, Aprianingsih A. DeLone – McLean
information system success model revisited: The separation of
intention to use‑use and the integration of technology acceptance
models. Int J Econ Finan Issues 2015;5 (1S):172‑82.
17. Tilahun B, Fritz F. Comprehensive evaluation of electronic medical
record system use and user satisfaction at five low‑resource setting
hospitals in Ethiopia. JMIR Med Inform 2015;3 (2):e22.
18. Cho KW, Bae SK, Ryu JH, Kim KN, An CH, Chae YM.
Performance evaluation of public hospital information systems
by the information system success model. Healthc Inform Res
2015;21 (1):43‑8.
19. Ritchi H, Fettry S, Susanto A. Toward defining key success factors
of E‑government and accounting information quality: Case of
Indonesia. Int J Account Res 2016;2 (1):20‑35.
20. Susanto A. How the quality of accounting information system
impact on accounting information quality (Research on Higher
Education in Bandung). J Eng Appl Sci 2017;12 (14):3672‑7.
)